The most cardinal sin that an extension to a popular media franchise can make is to be different. Formula, aesthetics, tone, canon -these mean everything and fresh ideas mean little. A lot of the homogeneity in our current mainstream media landscape has a lot to do with the fact that such brands refuse to take risks, adopt more provocative themes, or challenge existing norms within that brand. We've seen the intensity of the backlash when Star Wars does it, and we've seen it also when Star Trek has done it. 'Boldly going' apparently only means so much. And yet, going a different route and taking new chances has often resulted in better art, art that has elevated the brand it is created within. Case in point: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine . Granted, when the third live-action Star Trek show first debuted in January 1993, it was not greeted with immediate positivity for these same reasons. The internet was not ubiquitous at the time but there were certainly voices objecti...
Criticism, Essays, and Ramblings from Another Online Film Critic. Support me on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch, follow me on BlueSky at https://bsky.app/profile/jordanbosch.bsky.social and jbosch on Letterboxd