If you look deeply and between the lines, there is a profound sentiment at the heart of Pixar’s Hoppers . All nature, animals and humans, exist in symbiosis with each other, and the preservation of that natural contract depends on empathy and working together for the good of everyone and everything. It is a notion that we should all be able to get behind. But one person’s good is sadly not everybody’s. And though director and story architect Daniel Chong may disagree, not everyone can be compelled to do the right thing. Especially in the world of environmentalism and conservation, fights are rarely won (and then only pyrrhically) through compromise. He may understand this himself, his film openly notes the inconsistency of the laws that make up “Pond Rules”, but he is happy not to interrogate that for the sake of his broader theme. It’s a real shame because the film suffers for it. It’s not the only problem with this film, though it is rather blatant. Even in this very formless era...
Ever since she famously screamed in terror at the appearance of her apparent husband-to-be as her first act of consciousness, the Bride of Frankenstein has been a feminine icon of the horror genre. To some degree it was inevitable -she was one of the only female movie monsters of the classic era, and none that came after quite equaled her intensity of presence and her singular look, even with very little screen-time in the movie named for her. The Bride of Frankenstein does not appear in Mary Shelley’s novel, but that hasn’t stopped the character from being linked to Shelley -in the framing device of the 1935 movie, which posits the character was always intended to be part of the story and its moral theme; and in Maggie Gyllenhaal’s The Bride! , which suggests even more overtly the same. Of course in one sense it is putting words in the mouth of Shelley, in another it is casting her as an avatar for Gyllenhaal herself and a kind of quasi-feminist statement more broadly. It is very artf...