There is an ethical question hanging over Portrait of Jason , especially towards the end of the documentary. Is it justifiable to capture a man deteriorating under the influence on camera and provoking with some cruel words certain reactions out of him? It’s a level of manipulation, arguably exploitation that is especially wrong when trying to produce a work of authenticity, like documentary filmmaking is meant to be. And yet, there’s not a whole lot here that can definitively be called authentic. It might just be 105 minutes of bullshitting -we’re not meant to know. In any case, both director Shirley Clarke and subject Jason Holliday have been dead for quite some time and the 1967 movie exists as perhaps the central testament to both figures, whatever the issues and qualms about its making there may be. It is a minimalist and avant garde but still shrewd piece of filmmaking that does allow Clarke to construct a narrative out of a performance very broad and charismatic. It is esse...
You cannot convince me that Backrooms isn’t talking about A.I. Even though the aesthetic “creepypasta” on which the movie is based first surfaced on the internet in 2019, the effect of its unnerving look and feel -the ‘errors’ in reality- is remarkably similar to the creepy attributes of a lot of generative A.I. Articulating exactly what is off about the Backrooms is by a couple characters likened to describing a dog to someone who has never seen a dog before and asking them to draw a picture of it: some details will be correct but the thing as a whole will not quite resemble what a dog actually looks like. And isn’t that just what A.I. does? Generate (from a library of stolen data) an approximation of something that broadly appears correct …until you look more closely at it, and the flaws in design become starkly apparent. Kane Parsons may have considered that lens when he created his Backrooms web series while still a teenager in 2022. Four years later at the ripe old age of twenty,...