Skip to main content

Nobody Actually Cares about Black Helen of Troy

Nobody is more certain of anything than conservatives are that the whole world thinks exactly as them. We’ve seen it on so many fronts of political issues and idiotic culture wars over this last decade -conservatives, or those of a like reactive mindset, declaring with confidence any outcome that suits their prejudices. The rise of Trumpism taught them that fringe positions and complaints were a lot more popular than the mainstream expected -which was true but clearly not to the extent that they believe. There are so many other factors and nuances that have little to do with broader conservative grievances and the picture painted isn’t actually as accurate as they like to claim either (remembering that Trump only won a popular vote once and by the slimmest of margins).
It is exhausting, yet it is an exhaustion that has long spread to my space of interest, the movie space -an area where conservatives, for as much as they decry Hollywood’s ‘liberal elites’ at every opportunity, are desperate to capture and control. They are aware that movies, and art in general, is a vital backbone of culture, and it is one that they wish to define in their own image. So many voices within the conservative media sphere in the United States have ambitions towards making inroads in the entertainment industry -perhaps most obviously seen via Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire, Shapiro famously being a failed screenwriter as is the pattern of many right-wing media figures of his generation and younger.
And yet, who actually watches any of the shows or movies made for The Daily Wire? There is a dedicated audience for sure, but not a particularly big one. And not one that has perhaps much in the way of high standards of quality -so long as what is being served conforms to their biases. I strongly suspect that a large chunk of the viewers of dreck like The Pendragon Cycle, Lady Ballers, and Snow White and the Evil Queen watch out of a sense of political obligation more than entertainment value. And it is work not in any way interested in spreading beyond its insular audience. Never has one of these reverberated outside that bubble due to matters of quality, technique, or artistry -entirely independent of political leaning. Because the talent just isn’t there. The Daily Wire especially has to resort most of the time to casting its own pundits in these projects because few actors who have any kind of cache will touch them with a ten-foot pole (apart from apparently Jonathan Majors).
But that legitimacy in the world of film and television matters a lot to the conservative movement. Because it would be validation of their beliefs that they own the culture, that their ideology is indeed a reflection of the public’s. However they can construe that, they will. There are often a myriad of reasons behind why a particular movie fails at the box office, yet any time it is one from a big franchise or high expectations and features a woman, person of colour, or LGBTQ person, they see it as a victory. “Go woke and go broke”. It doesn’t help that within the larger culture there have been a few instances in which a company or brand has folded to such criticisms eventually and fired a person or made a vaguely regressive statement of vision. Disney has had a few notorious moments of this. So too has Paramount, which has been successfully captured for the right-wing by theEllisons.
And yet it is all an illusion, one that festers very well in online spaces such as Elon Musk’s Twitter, but have little to no real footprint in the outside world. The vast majority of people after all, are not compulsively online -something the right has had a hard time learning in the political sphere as well. Each time a movie decried as woke by imbeciles has come short at the box office, it is for reasons entirely divorced from ideology. Certainly, an unwarranted stream of hate due to identity politics isn’t a good thing for the movie either -but it is not the core of what went wrong. And most of the time, folks on the other side of the aisle dislike the thing as well. An obvious recent example would be Supergirl, which underperformed not because Kara Zor-El was bisexual and ‘unattractive’ to an army of basement goblins but because it was rushed, it was about a lesser-known character with a deeply boring villain, and bad word-of-mouth about these things got out ahead of the movie. Also, the superhero genre is in notable decline right now outside the biggest names in the game. Of course, sexism does play a role, and you could argue it was significantly amplified here, but we have seen female-led superhero movies such as Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel, and BlackPanther: Wakanda Forever turn into big hits -and those had fairly “woke” politics as well.
The same holds true in the television sphere. Enthusiasm for the Star Wars universe is beginning to run its course as well -though we don’t actually know how popular or not some of those shows are without Disney unveiling the numbers. But something like the much hated The Acolyte not doing well owes just as much to its lack of a tie-in to recognizable characters and contexts. It’s for that exact same reason that Andor isn’t hugely popular, though it gets much more attention from critics and its fanbase due to its level of quality. Same goes for the Star Trek universe, where the show Starfleet Academy was heavily attacked by conservatives -a show that did go out of its way to be diverse and progressive in line with Star Trek’s general ethos. But that show also had few connections to previous Trek entities in an era for the franchise where the most popularly successful entries -Picard, Strange New Worlds, and arguably Lower Decks are innately tied in to franchise nostalgia. Also, it was a show experimenting in the coming-of-age genre a la a CW Drama which was likely an alienating tone for some fans. The point is that for each of these installments in popular media to be attacked by the right they faltered for reasons beyond the culture war bullshit they got attached to. There are a lot of reasons for viewers not to like or be interested in a particular piece of media -it’s just that those who hate for the dumbest of reasons tend to come off the loudest.
But we got a fierce rebuttal recently to that notion that where media is concerned there is any connection between the online conservative ecosystem and the real world. And that is the reception to Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey. In case you missed it, the movie has been the target of a months-long rage campaign and loose boycott on the internet ever since photos surfaced that depicted among other things Lupita Nyong'o as Helen of Troy and Elliot Page as a then unnamed character assumed by some to be Achilles (a figure who dies during the Trojan War before the story is set). Spearheaded, or at least popularized by Elon Musk -a pathologically insecure trillionaire with nothing better to do with his time, the issue around the casting of this movie became the latest culture war flashpoint, and an unavoidable one. Legions of commentators who had most likely never picked up a copy of Homer's epic poem raved and railed about historical authenticity to this fictitious story, mocked the idea of a black woman playing a figure renowned for her beauty, and of course criticizing a trans man for simply daring to exist. Conspiracy theories accompanied this that Nolan was pandering to 'woke' politics for an Oscar (the two he has already received apparently not being enough), the integrity and faux concern for Greek representation was dragged in, and the 2004 movie Troy -which has never been a particularly beloved film and is famously wildly inaccurate to The Iliad- was suddenly being evoked as a bastion of classical fidelity. It is all just regurgitated racism and transphobia, poorly disguised and excused combined with that resentment again towards a Hollywood not bending enough to a fascist view of art and the world.
In all this noise a common refrain grew that the movie would be a catastrophic bomb at the box office. The right had so mistaken their outrage campaign as indicative of widespread opinion that seemingly everyone appeared certain the movie was going to tank. This in spite of Nolan's long record of box office success, the fact that the film had been selling out IMAX pre-sale tickets for months, and that most forecasters taking into account the film's budget estimated it was highly likely to break even, especially in non-U.S. territories where Nolan's films have also been highly profitable. Critical reception in advance of opening weekend was highly positive, but this only further fueled the narrative of its failure, this breed of conservatives having long derided the critical community (and critical thinking in general) as partisan or bought-out (I went into this nonsense morein a previous essay). No matter what, in their view, the movie was destined to be a trainwreck -Musk again pushing this delusion with the most surety, as is perfectly on brand. Nobody is better at being very wrong very dramatically than Elon Musk.
As is more than apparent at this point though, The Odyssey is well on track to be not only a hit but an enormous hit. It raked in 124 million its opening weekend in the U.S. and has not seen a significant drop in the weeks since, with some analysts saying it is likely to cross 1 billion before the end of its theatrical run. Not only that but the reception of most audiences is seemingly in-line with critical consensus -and it is getting great word-of-mouth buzz. It is a good movie on a grand scale and the attention it is receiving is appropriate to that.
And it is fraying the minds of all of those who tried to turn the movie into a culture war touchstone and were so invested in it being a flop. It is a very entertaining thing to watch, especially all of the grasping at straws and conspiracy theories naturally arising from this crowd to this eventuality: that studios are buying out tickets for empty theatres (but without the receipts that show up when Angel Studios has done exactly that), that leftist activists are watching multiple times in a single weekend to drum up numbers, and of course consistently shifting the goalposts of how much the movie actually has to make to turn a profit (hint: it’s much less than most are suggesting and has by now already been achieved). Some can indeed see how pathetic these excuses are -Ben Shapiro rather sheepishly conceded the movie’s quality and even its conservative thematic attributes. Others are still in denial, most especially -guess who- Elon Musk, who has channeled his rage about a movie on a subject he pretends to care about into a vow to either give Mel Gibson a billion dollars to make an “accurate” version of The Odyssey (an amount of money he is unwilling to spend on important causes) or just get Grok to generate an A.I. slop of The Odyssey before the end of the year. On that note he’s not the first: there is apparently an A.I. version of The Odyssey set to drop in some fashion before the end of the summer -its makers are talentless hacks but at least don’t appear to be motivated out of spite. None of these are going to have any impact though, and perhaps knowing that is what bothers Musk and these other trolls so much. Because a rather dramatic curtain has been pulled back on how influential the right-wing culture war grift actually is.
Fundamentally, the public does not care how woke or not a movie is. And that does go the other way as well, at least in western countries. A movie with an all-white cast is at no more an advantage than one that is more diverse -and that is its own issue. But outside of these perennially online conservative ecosystems, identity politics do not factor into general interest for a movie among the actual public. In a story of a scope like this, nobody really cares that a trans person is on-screen, and nobody really cares that a black woman is Helen of Troy. It’s why the conservative backlash is so strong towards mainstream movies that have even minimal representation, such as those that come from Disney. They have to manufacture that the existence of a woman or person of colour, or LGBTQ person is a problem, because they know most audiences won’t see it that way -and that it is a tool to simply normalizing the diversity of people who exist around all of us.
Meaningless drama though this whole situation has been, it is a useful barometer for how much pull in culture, and pop culture especially, the online right actually has. They are not any kind of cultural arbiters in touch with where the average person is. In the real world people are not concerned with the kind of petty posturing and infringements on white heterodoxy that these fascists are. It's why on a macro level the most extreme facets of Trump's second term in the United States have been extraordinarily unpopular. Most people, even those with some issues of bigotry be they personal or systematic, do not care so strongly about the mere presence of those who are different.
I don't mean that as a comforting thing -it's not ideal that a lot of regular people are generally apathetic about matters of diversity, representation, and rights; but it is a sobering thing for the modern conservative movement, which seems to depend a lot on people caring passionately about such things that don't directly affect them. With luck, the scope of this episode ought to be a canary in the coal mine for future culture wars, but conservatives -especially those entrenched in online bubbles- are not known for learning from mistakes. It is an indicator at least to the rest of us though that the emperor has no clothes -there is no connection between these loud agitators and the public at large. The culture war has always been a manufactured fiction. Just as The Odyssey is. Only The Odyssey actually has value.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....