Skip to main content

Wonder Woman Makes for a Wonderful Time


          We were long overdue for a Wonder Woman movie. Given her prominence and history in superhero comics, as well as her status as the first great superheroine, a feature film centred around this character should have come out at least twenty years ago. It took the DC Cinematic Universe to get her to the big screen, and though they haven’t been doing great thus far, she was one of the few good parts of Batman v. Superman.
          Diana (Gal Gadot) is an Amazon raised on the isolated island of Themyscira, an all-female warrior society left behind by Zeus to protect the world from the wrath of the god of war Ares. In 1918, a pilot and spy called Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) accidentally discovers the island, and upon revealing to them a Great War that’s going on in the outside world, Diana is compelled to join him, fight this war, and defeat Ares which she believes will end all conflict. In that war, Trevor’s mission is to stop a German general (Danny Huston) from releasing a devastatingly toxic new mustard gas.
          Wonder Woman is directed by Patty Jenkins, the director of 2003’s Monster, and she clearly brings a great level of competence and skill to this film. The world of Themyscira is wonderfully realized, from its Antiquity look and customs, to the details about its culture and relationship to the outside world (the Amazons know plenty of concepts, just not in practice). But First World War Europe is also well depicted: the grim and smoggy London, the dirtiness and suffering of the trenches and No Mans’ Land, and the regal opulence of those controlling the war but lucky enough to be far from the Front. The story is also directed both sensibly and in service of its’ title character. Sure there is occasional slow pacing, but overall this a nearly two and a half hour movie that doesn’t feel like it. It’s simple but it keeps you very invested, and a lot of that is due to Diana’s journey.
          Gal Gadot is stunning in this movie, and not just in how she looks. She’s actually really good in the part. She’s very physically strong of course, but also outspoken, determined, yet confused and obstinate. She cares about every person in sorrow and has a genuine passion for making things right. I love that she’s given a thorough character arc, and unlike Man of Steel, an original one at that, tied to her preconceptions of human nature. Chris Pine does what’s needed for his role: Diana’s introduction to this new world, her love interest, companion, and foil. And the two have a decent believable chemistry. Connie Nielsen is good as Diana’s mother Hippolyta, as is Robin Wright in her brief role as her teacher Antiope. David Thewlis gets some well-deserved attention as a British politician whom Trevor reports to. The film also features Ewen Bremner as a Scottish sharpshooter, Saïd Taghmaoui as a covert agent, Elena Anaya as the scientist behind the new formula, and Lucy Davis as Trevor’s secretary. The only casting that doesn’t quite work is Danny Huston as the villain, who not only is a pretty bland German antagonist, but one who’s based on a real figure, Erich Ludendorff, whose real history is very much at odds with what’s portrayed here.
          The visuals in this movie are for the most part pretty good. The action scenes do have a few too many slow-mo shots, but are generally well choreographed and fun to watch. There’s one in particular, beginning when Diana goes over the trenches (a really awesome hero moment), that’s especially incredible. The production design is again really nice, the look of Themyscira is perfectly paradisal. And there’s a really great bit at the beginning where their mythology is told through a style that looks like Renaissance paintings in motion. I like the music too, both the now familiar Wonder Woman theme, and the triumphant motifs that underscore Diana’s best moments.
          The films’ weaknesses are in some of its humour, that though funny in places -the typical fish-out-of-water moments- is sometimes just awkward; and the climax which does go on too long. Little in it is necessarily bad, but it didn’t need to be this drawn out. Her moment of truth is also arguably a cliché conclusion. And seriously, the name ‘Chief’ is the most unoriginal name for a Native-American character you can think of.
          Wonder Woman is a fantastic superhero film -by far the best of the DCEU, and the summer movie season thus far! Directors like Patty Jenkins are who this company needs going forward. She told a coherent story with a character you want to see more of, and didn’t even feel the need to shoehorn other DC characters or stories into it. It’s Wonder Woman’s movie, and quite frankly, is the movie Wonder Woman deserved.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more