Skip to main content

Going it Solo


Han Solo is a great character to base a movie around. Not only was he the fan favourite of the original Star Wars trilogy, but that trilogy regularly hinted through allusions and off-the-cuff remarks that he had a very fascinating history. Solo: A Star Wars Story was then naturally inevitable, and after a bumpy start where comedy directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller were booted off the project for the safer Ron Howard, it’s finally hit the cinemas. How does it deliver on the backstory of our favourite interstellar smuggler?
After escaping the slums of the planet Corellia, Han Solo (Alden Ehrenreich) aspires to become a pilot so that he can return and rescue his girlfriend Qi’ra (Emilia Clarke). After some time in the Imperial Navy, he joins up with a smuggler Tobias Beckett (Woody Harrelson), who takes him under his wing ushering him into the criminal underworld. They undertake a job for a dangerous crime lord (Paul Bettany) and along the way Han is introduced to Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo), Lando Calrissean (Donald Glover), and most importantly, the Millennium Falcon.
This film hits all the beats of Han Solo’s established lore, from his experience in the Empire to the infamously insensible Kessel run to the sabacc game with Lando that won him the Falcon. However each of these now visually realized are just a tad underwhelming. The game suffers from being a little too long, the Kessel run is built up well to only get lost in a repeat of the fish sequence from Phantom Menace, and most unfortunately is the lack of any time spent with Han in the Empire. He spends years in their navy and infantry that we’re told about rather than shown, and it would’ve made for some really interesting development for the future Rebellion hero to have seen him working among them. The film though is much more interested in Han the outlaw.
Ehrenreich’s performance as the lead was always going to be heavily scrutinized given the iconic shadow of Harrison Ford and I think the actor was aware of this, which is why his acting is tumultuous. Most of the time he’s decent, carving out some new facets to the character, but every so often it’s clear he’s trying to mimic Ford’s performance through his mannerisms and body language -and it gets distracting. It’s made harder for him for the fact that Han is written differently than the films we know him from. He’s required to be the protagonist after all, so his behaviour has to be tweaked. Suotamo replaces Peter Mayhew well though, and the chemistry between Chewbacca and Han is one of the movies’ strengths. Their friendship feels genuine, endearing, and earned. As usual, Harrelson’s really good, and in spite of her character being severely let down by a finale that takes no notice of the constant foreshadowing in her arc, Clarke is as well. Glover is fantastic as Lando, capturing that smooth charisma that made us love Billy Dee Williams’ stylish original. Bettany does okay as a throwaway villain and newcomer Erin Kellyman is a pleasant surprise. However Thandie Newton and Phoebe Waller-Bridge play rather pointless characters with no bearing on any significant element of the narrative or the ultimate direction of the last act.
It’s there where much of Solo’s plot falls apart. This is a movie with a lot of great set-up, but lacklustre pay-offs. Up until the last act, the film does have a conventional focus, some clumsy pacing, poorly done fan service and exposition, and a handful of jokes clearly left over from Miller and Lord’s script; yet is still creative, energetic, and intriguing. Han is taken to places both physically and personally that you’re very curious about. However late in the film, additional elements are brought in to keep Han from being morally ambiguous, and the climax itself is a little ridiculous. There are a couple twists that don’t make any sense, some far too convenient plot devices, and a strange open-endedness to an otherwise conclusive origin story.
That’s not to say Solo isn’t without merit. There is a lot to like about it. Most of the action sequences and effects are good, the world building enjoyable, and the natural humour very effective. I love seeing the Millennium Falcon in its prime, I love the Treasure Island motif in one of the films’ central relationships, and I love that there’s an explanation behind Han’s “Solo” moniker.
But I can’t say it’s good -it’s much too confused, constrained, and actually unambitious. Perhaps the biggest disappointment of all is that Solo, unlike its namesake, doesn’t take chances. In contrast to the other recent Star Wars movies, it doesn’t offer anything substantively new. It’s not as bleak as Rogue One nor as relentlessly bold as The Last Jedi; and take out the name and the familiarity of its characters, and it’s just an average sci-fi adventure flick. Generally, Star Wars movies aspire to something greater.
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more