Skip to main content

Penny Dreadful Reviews: "Perpetual Night"


          God has sent his plagues upon Old London Town. That’s pretty much what I got from the penultimate episode of Penny Dreadful, which is a conceptually cool episode if not always one that delivers. It’s the only episode in the series not to feature Eva Green at all, apart from a repeat opening narration from last episode. Vanessa’s really just a cloud hanging over as Chandler is once again put in focus.
          Chandler arrives with Sir Malcolm and Kaetenay in a deserted, dark, and foggy London (what we don’t see is if there are any other passengers to react to this). Large groups of rats are scurrying about the dock, frogs are coming out of drains in swarms, and we later find out roughly seven thousand people have died. They walk all the way to Murray Manor, and once there Chandler (very symbolically) finds a dead wolf hung from the ceiling in Vanessa’s room. Vanessa of course, isn’t there. Sir Malcolm finds a woman in the parlour he mistakes for Vanessa, but is actually a vampire who immediately bites him. Chandler is also overcome by similar night creatures, and along with Kaetenay and Catriona Hartdegen, is able to overpower them. Catriona manages to gain their trust, but I’m a little suspect of her character and how significant a player she’s become in so short a period of time. There’s definitely more to her than she’s letting on. Sir Malcolm demands a gun to kill himself, which Kaetenay seems more than willing to comply with, but Catriona stops him and instead cauterizes the wound rather painfully with a hot poker. With Catriona to look after Sir Malcolm, Chandler leaves to find Vanessa. When Sir Malcolm comes to, he questions Catriona and there even seems to be a bit of weird flirting. Seward arrives after having her own encounter with Renfield. She caught him with Vanessa’s recording and figured out he was a servant of Dracula. Renfied who’s taken to eating the frogs, wrongfully assumes Seward isn’t killer before she beats him up and imprisons him in what looks like Bedlam. That’s where she takes Sir Malcolm and Catriona, intending to “rip” Vanessa’s whereabouts from his mind. Renfield seems especially attracted to Catriona but she manages to intimidate him enough. Again, there’s definitely something going on between her and the vampires, almost as though she’s a new female Van Helsing. 
          In what may just be a few doors down, if Seward and company are in Bedlam, Frankenstein is readying his experiment on Lily. This crew seems to hardly notice what’s going on in London, though that may be because they’re underground the whole time. But it still seems very disparate. Lily attempts in vain to seduce Dorian one last time and then insultingly refers to Jeckyll as an “assistant”. Both he and Dorian leave, he rather reluctantly when Frankenstein idiotically agrees to Lily’s request they be left alone. And moments after they’re gone she asks for some water, and in the moment their hands touch she attempts to strike. Honestly for such a great mind, Frankenstein makes a lot of really dumb calls, but you could say it’s his emotions driving him. Because of this, Frankenstein finds it difficult to go through with the plan, exactly as Jeckyll seemed to fear. Lily claims she would rather die than become what he will make her, and calls out what he actually did to Brona Croft and what he initially made Lily into. It’s Frankenstein hearing for perhaps the first time, an objective account of his transgressions. She then recalls how Brona had a daughter called Sarah and tells the story of how she was mistreated and beaten by numerous men, and she’s very emotionally moved by it. She tells one specific event in great detail which clearly effects Frankenstein. Harry Treadaway’s quite good in this scene, and so is Billie Piper. Even though Lily’s emotion feels overplayed, that strikes me as the intent. We don’t know whether Lily’s genuine in this breakdown, or if she’s acting a part merely to get Frankenstein to free her. Once she ends it by saying her daughter died alone, Frankenstein predictably lets down his syringe and unchains her saying “it is too easy being monsters, let’s try to be human”. More surprising though is that she doesn’t use this to overpower or attack him, she merely kisses him and leaves. So it’s possible she was genuine, which would be a bit anticlimactic, but she also may have plans for him further. This whole plot point, though ably performed, is lacking in pay-off to a season-long arc to get Lily there, and so for now I’m a little disappointed in it. Perhaps Jeckyll’s reaction will change things, and with any hope lead to a Mr. Hyde appearance in the finale. 
          Dorian meanwhile goes back to his house; and the problem with this scene in particular going on is the state of London. In Bedlam, you could conceive they just aren’t aware, but when Dorian returns to find Justine and the other ladies still all there, it’s incredibly out of place given the main idea the city’s supposed to be in darkness and despair. Dorian orders them all out, but Justine stands up and asks where Lily is. Dorian reveals his treachery in taking her to Frankenstein, and getting ahead of himself, claims she’s already been tamed. Justine refuses to believe it but Dorian presses the point. She stabs him with a kitchen knife, but it appears she was not fully aware of his immortality. Nor were the other ladies, none of whom perhaps took literally Lily’s diatribes on them being immortals. In Justine’s shock that this doesn’t phase him, I half-expected Dorian to respond “I’m curious, after killing me what is it you’re planning on doing next?” Instead Dorian tells her to go back to her old life (again not considering that given the state of things that’s not really possible). When she says she’d rather die, Dorian kills her by snapping her neck, just to remind us he’s not a nice guy.
          In the only subplot that takes into account what’s going on in London, Caliban is dining with his family who are remaining indoors until the fog lifts, unsure when that will be. Caliban’s trying to be optimistic by promising to move them back to their old apartment and find a job perhaps as an undertaker given the recent influx of dead bodies. But Jack is getting ever more sick, coughing up blood now. And as if this storyline couldn’t get any more Dickensian, Caliban promises they’ll spend every Sunday in Kensington Gardens, in true Bob Crachit forlorn hopelessness. He also makes a suggestion they go to the coasts or up north to escape the pestilence. It’s nice to see people who genuinely love Caliban, and for its misery, it’s not a bad counter to what’s happening in the more prominent storylines. There is no way Jack is living through the next episode though.
          Finally Chandler, in looking for Vanessa, seeks out Frankenstein at his home. When he doesn’t find him there, a little vampire boy offers to take him to Frankenstein. Chandler in a less characteristic act of gullibility, follows him right into a vampire trap in Chinatown. Dracula appears and confronts him, somehow sensing his love for Vanessa as well as the fact that he too, is a creature of the night. Chandler makes clear he’s come to save Vanessa, which prompts Dracula to summon his minions. Essentially Chandler has to fight these mini-bosses before taking on Dracula who’s still in the vicinity. He turns into Wolf-Man and begins slaying vampires. At this point you may have noticed one character awkwardly disappear without any mention. Well in the middle of this fray, he returns and in a development I probably should have anticipated at some point, it turns out Kaetenay is a werewolf too, and he comes to aid Chandler in his fight. The make-up on Wes Studi’s not bad as well. However the episode abruptly ends here, and though a bit of a twist, it’s not as narratively significant as the writers would want. 
          So in hiding Vanessa, “Perpetual Night” managed to sidestep some of the things I was worried about going in. Nevertheless and despite the dreary gothic atmosphere, it’s not all that good. True it has some very good moments, the performances in the Lily-Frankenstein plot were great, and there was some interesting showcasing of this climate, as well as some terrific visuals. The action scene at Murray Manor is thrilling enough and Kaetenay’s reveal I thought was really cool. But a couple of the subplots were a bit awkward given the larger scope of the episode, and there are still a few more hints than there are definitive answers, particularly with regards to Catriona, Seward, and obviously Vanessa. The major plot threads feel more like set-up for the finale than anything else. And going into the finale I have a lot of expectations. This season and even Penny Dreadful as a whole, has promised a lot to deliver on. Where are they going with Vanessa? Are they handling her turn into a vampire well? How will they defeat Dracula? What will be the fate of Chandler? Or Kaetenay? (okay, he’s probably going to die, but it’s going to be a great death) Is Seward’s resemblance to the Cut-Wife going to be a big thing? What about Sir Malcolm; will he have to do to Vanessa what he did to Mina? How’s Caliban’s story going to end? Or Dorian’s, Frankenstein’s, and Lily’s? Will we see Mr. Hyde?? There’s a lot that needs to happen, and a lot to wrap-up, and this episode in not giving us much, is putting all the more pressure on that finale. I’m very much hoping it will surprise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....