Skip to main content

Penny Dreadful Reviews: "Possession"

          The subject matter of “Possession” is very much akin to the penny dreadfuls that inspired the series title. In that it’s both very dark while also ludicrous in some of its conceits. The episode actually balances the camp with some genuine dark moments really well and you’re concerned with what will happen to Vanessa in the aftermath of last episode’s sudden levitation.
          It seems Vanessa’s encounter with Dorian led to a psycho-sexual response and possession by a demon (thanks Dorian!). It lashes out and toys with audience expectations by acting like Vanessa’s recovered a couple times only to reveal nothing’s changed. The gang restrain her and try to care for her (Sembene deals quite a slap to the face), but it soon becomes hopeless as Vanessa sinks under her possessors control. Meanwhile Chandler begins to suspect Sir Malcolm doesn’t have her best interests at heart and the impatient group begin to squabble over bringing in a priest to perform an exorcism.
          Unlike other episodes where the action’s divided amongst the main cast in their separate stories, this one’s mostly confined to one setting and all the characters coming together to look after Vanessa. It’s actually strange for a show as dark as this one to show this level of compassion and friendship. But it makes sense for what we’ve seen of the characters, and we do get that they still distrust each other and aren’t the closest of teams. Scenes like Chandler teaching Frankenstein how to shoot and Chandler passing the time with Sembene (“what’s your story?”he asks just like I have been; it seems Sembene may have saved Sir Malcolm’s life); they’re corny and whimsical though and may not be the best offset to what Vanessa’s going through. There were a couple interesting points while everyone was waiting on Vanessa. Caliban is still waiting for Frankenstein as seen when Frankenstein briefly looks out a window to find him standing outside. We also hear a possible darker story to what happened in Africa when the possessed Vanessa accuses Sir Malcolm of forcing his son to have sex with the local women. Sir Malcolm himself later reveals his guilt for having left Peter behind, coming back to find him dead, and proceeding to name a mountain range after himself rather than Peter. Thus why he’s planning another expedition to bring home the body. Sir Malcolm’s is the story I put more stock in believing, but you never quite know on a show like this. There’s also an insinuation that Sir Malcolm was dissatisfied by his wife’s weight and had affairs because of that. I like that we see Frankenstein being an actual doctor as he looks for a cure to Vanessa’s condition, and Chandler’s comparison of Vanessa’s existence between two worlds to Natives escaping captivity but being unwelcome in their own tribes is pretty good. Chandler also gets into a row with Sir Malcolm when he pressures the ill Vanessa to reach out to Mina. Again it muddles his intentions towards her.
          I love the effect Vanessa’s possession has on the vicinity. In one scene, Frankenstein throws a playing card on a desk and spiders swarm out of it (very much like the ones in the opening theme). There’s also a good scene where Vanessa is visited by a demon disguised as Chandler. It ropes you along for a little before revealing who he is and the scene is performed adequately by a petrified Eva Green. The demon also knows about Chandler’s night with Dorian or has some kind of telepathic ability. The rest of her possession sequences are mixed. Sometimes they’re really intense and horrifying, but others are a little overdone.
          The real camp comes when they bring in the priest to perform last rites and they do a lot of the Exorcist tropes. The whole idea of Vanessa being trapped in the room, the priest being attacked, her breaking free of restraints, speaking in tongues...it was all done scarier in the William Friedkin film. There’s even a scene where Vanessa’s screaming while we see Chandler looking up at her window with his hat on at night. It’s all I could think about watching the scene and I couldn’t entirely take it seriously. I half expected Mercedes McCambridge’s voice to come out every time Vanessa opened her mouth. And the ceiling crawling was almost downright funny. But I will give props to the make-up. The detail on Vanessa’s body when the bloody symbols begin to form are terrific and right out of any great horror movie. You completely feel for her, understand her fear, as well as the others’ decision to let her die. She’s made to look incredibly pale and unhealthy and it really has an effect. Whatever her true nature may be, you feel enormous sympathy for Vanessa throughout this whole episode.
          And the ending is certainly fascinating and unexpected. The priest being incapacitated, Chandler manages to hold Vanessa while chanting and holding a cross, and actually manages to exorcize the demon himself. And then he just leaves. It’s not a bad twist and is executed fairly well with Chandler leaving in the snow making for a great visual. It makes me wonder more about him than I have in the past. How can he perform an exorcism? I actually would have preferred it ended here, instead of the revelation that a fully cured Vanessa now knows where Mina is. 
          “Possession” delivered on what it promised -it gave us a possession, and while at times it felt too derivative of The Exorcist and sheer amount of demonic powers were hard to take seriously, it gave us some character revelations, confined its action to its core cast in one place which actually worked out well and provided some genuine frights and an unexpected climax. As I said it was very much a penny dreadful, the kind these characters may read. It may not be all that conducive to the next episode season finale but its enjoyable enough. It has that dark gothic tone while at the same time is able to include levitation, other magic, and lines like “she’s been possessed by the devil”-“oh fuck me”. This may not be one of the best episodes, but some of the stuff that happens is the best in the series thus far and I’m hoping it’s even better at the Grand Guignol in the finale.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....