Skip to main content

What Makes Only Yesterday so Special?



         After her terrific performance in Star Wars: The Force Awakens, it was expected that Daisy Ridley would start showing up in other films. But many people may not be aware that she just has, though in one that’s only getting a limited release and was in fact actually released twenty-five years ago.
          Only Yesterday originally released in 1991, is an animated film from Studio Ghibli made by the great Isao Takahata -the filmmaker behind the powerful Grave of the Fireflies and the more recently captivating The Tale of the Princess Kaguya. Until now it’s never been dubbed in English as every other Studio Ghibli film has. Thanks to GKIDS however it’s finally come to North America with an English dub starring Daisy Ridley and Dev Patel and is certainly a long time coming. With how long it’s taken, you might fear it’s because of poor reception or that this was the film Studio Ghibli didn’t want re-released around the world. On the contrary, I think this is one of their very best films and by the standards of Studio Ghibli, that’s saying a lot!
          The film is about Taeko Okajima a 27 year old woman who is fed up with the city, having lived her entire life in Tokyo, and decides to visit the distant family of her brother-in-law in the countryside. When she arrives she becomes a hard worker in the safflower harvest and begins to enjoy this very different kind of life, particularly in the company of Toshio a country-bred labourer. All the while, she reflects on her childhood in the 1960s the trials she had to go through especially in school that helped discipline herself and make her the woman she’s become today.
          One of the most notable things about this film is that this was the first Studio Ghibli release to be a snippet of real modern life with no magical or fantastical elements involved. Since then we’ve had Whisper of the Heart and From Up on Poppy Hill, both good in their own right and similarly coming-of-age stories, but this film has the more interesting factor of being told from an adult’s point of view. It’s an animated adult drama and arguably more than any other Ghibli film, doesn’t need to be animated. And while I prefer animation to be conveying something that can’t be conveyed through live-action (one of the reasons I didn’t like last year’s Anomalisa), this film really seems to earn it. Though not quite as beautiful to look at as some of Takahata’s other films, there are some great visuals. The golden safflowers look wonderful and everything in the country just feels full of life which is a great contrast to the artificiality of the city as well as Taeko’s flashbacks. And while those flashbacks have a paleness to them, a focus on white and cloudiness, I love how perfect an allusion it is stylistically to the opaqueness of memory. It’s in these scenes I know live-action could not capture this story nearly as well.
          This is a film that’s well-structured and immediately relatable.Throughout, we’re following two stories in two times but both deeply connected. I’ve seen this device used in biopics a few times, but Taeko is nobody famous despite her childhood hopes. This is just a story about an ordinary woman reflecting on her past and coming to realize how it’s shaped her, who she is, and where she belongs. Pfft, sounds boring. What’s so great about that? Why would that work?
          Well, because it’s just that; this is a film inherently about life, the connectivity between childhood and adulthood, how we’re shaped by our triumphs and mistakes, coming to terms with memories, and questioning our history, our choices in relation to who we are now. These are things everyone can relate to. I think Only Yesterday is very comparable to one of my favourite films, Boyhood which dealt with a lot of the same themes.But here we are given a glimpse of adolescence from a girl’s perspective in Japan where there are cultural as well as circumstantial distinctions. The focus is appropriately placed in the flashbacks on generally minor things, but things that were very important to her, such as her obsession over owning a popular product, or over-hyping a performance in a school play. We see her reaction to having her first period, the scene which kept Disney from releasing the film for so many years (so let me get this straight Disney; shape-shifting testicles in Pom Poko is fine, but a girl realistically freaking out over her first menstruation is too much??). How all of these connect to her current situation whether through conversation or just a nostalgic experience brought on by a sight or sound is very fascinating. It emphasizes more the importance of all the objectively small things in our lives because of how big they could be at the time to each person and thus more etched into memory. While Boyhood focused on minor things, it also incorporated a lot of big changes in life, but this film didn’t need them. Because what was important were the big moments to Taeko, so we didn’t need to see her family move, her first date, car, or drink. In doing this it emphasizes what not a lot of similar films have, that life changing moments are not all the same but very personal in nature.
          Because she represents this very well, Taeko is a superb and interesting character, being just the right amount of identifiable and unique to make the points of this film clear. She’s completely believable in her enthusiasm for a different kind of work and lifestyle and you can almost physically see her transform by her experiences in the country aided by the fact that voiceover gives us a window into her thoughts. As she finds out who she is, the viewer is also compelled to contemplate the same ideas. Like Taeko, I found myself reflecting briefly during and after the film. Especially so in my favourite scene towards the end which in place of a great climax only consists of Taeko and Toshio talking while driving in the rain; a story being told without using a flashback for a change which actually makes it more affecting. It’s poetic, beautiful, moving, and even insightful (Toshio not for the first time offers an alternative idea to a point of view). And it’s bound to keep you thinking not out of frustration or speculation, but reflection. It encourages you to look inward and to apply the film’s character journey to yourself. To elicit this kind of response is a great thing for a movie to do and one of the main purposes of the art of cinema.
          If I have criticisms they would be fairly minor. Like it might have been nice to see different stages in Taeko’s childhood rather than to only be focused on the time she was ten. I’d have liked to have seen how some of these important moments affected her later adolescence. But at the same time I understand that to many there really was just that one year in their childhoods that seemed more important than the rest. So it’s a criticism I can easily overlook.
          Suffice it to say, it’s a very good thing that Only Yesterday has finally been released in North America and I can’t wait to see this dub. I truly think it’s one of the finest Studio Ghibli has ever put out and as many people as possible deserve to see it. Even when Ghibli is not making grand and magical flights of fantasy or epics, they still have a profound ability to hit home in their subtlety, style, and keenness to in some way touch the human spirit. And I think Only Yesterday may be the best example of that.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....