Skip to main content

Predator: Badlands Shifts Focus and Smoothly Rewrites its Franchise

Though the Predator franchise owes a lot to its elder brother Alien, it’s titular monster could never command quite the same kind of horror. The Alien is a distinctly unrelatable creature in every facet and stage of development, while the Predator, though vicious, is much more humane in both physiology and anthropology. The Predators have technology, language, culture, and an extremely clear motivation as game hunters -they aren’t so unknowable in concept. It doesn’t mean they can’t and haven’t been scary, but it did make them the easier party to slot into a protagonist-adjacent role when the two franchises were finally brought together in Alien vs. Predator. After that, the next several movies kept them restored to formidable enemy status -most successfully so in Dan Trachtenberg’s Prey, the series’ high-point.
But clearly Trachtenberg is very compelled by the Predator as more than the ruthless hunter, and in Predator: Badlands, as far-removed a follow-up in both context and focus as you can get, he centres the Predator as the anchor of the story, explores his world and culture a touch more, depicts him in a starkly relatable and cognizant context -in a way that doesn’t soften the creature as he has been depicted in the past, but adds more depth. All while offering a new perspective on a counterpart general human character at the same time.
The movie follows Dek (Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi), a young inexperienced Predator (we learn that their species name is actually Yautja) considered a ‘runt’ by his clan for his apparent weakness, having failed in a previous hunt. Sentenced to death by his father, he is saved by his elder brother  -who dies in Dek’s place as he is sent off-world in a quest of honour to bring back the head of a supposedly unkillable alien called the Kalisk on the hostile planet Genna. Challenged at every turn by the plant and animal life of the impossibly lethal world, Dek soon encounters  a damaged android called Thia (Elle Fanning), left behind by a Weyland-Yutani team scavenging the world and exploiting its resources. The two form an unlikely union to find both the Kalisk and Thia’s twin Tessa.
This may be the first time outside of the actual Alien vs. Predator crossovers to openly link those universes through the prominent presence of both the Alien franchise’s distinctive synthetics and its ubiquitous all-powerful Company (even the A.I. MU/TH/UR is seen to be overseeing the operation on Genna and giving the androids their orders). Remarkably though, this doesn’t delineate the film’s story or distract from its focus. Because it feels thematically relevant rather then corporately synergistic (MU/TH/UR is a little bit corporately synergistic). There is a function of commentary for both the characters of Thia and Tessa, who eventually shows up in a fairly predictable capacity. And it is no coincidence that it comes alongside a Predator stripped of most of his usual high-tech weapons -apart from a couple gadgets, Dek has to fend for himself on this world through raw strength. And he can do that, he can survive on his own. But as Thia notes, “who would want to survive on their own.”
Thia is heavily humanized in her role as a companion for Dek, but she is still an artificial intelligence, and in her usefulness in helping him track down the Kalisk she comes across as an interesting metaphor for the useful functions of A.I. -as a tool, which Dek literally refers to her as. Her cognizance aside, she has value for Dek for the information she can provide, but she depends on him as much as he does her. A circumstantially symbiotic relationship, yet one that doesn’t require any offense to Dek’s autonomy or his own capacity to hunt. Tessa meanwhile is A.I. as a tool of capitalist state -exploitative and destructive, seeking to put down the Predator’s powers and substitute them. Indeed, she is what A.I. is more commonly used for in the modern age.
But this isn’t to say that either android steals attention away from Dek -he is the primal focus, and for a largely effects-rendered protagonist (and not a particularly visually appealing one at that) who speaks exclusively in a Yautja language wholly invented for this film, he manages to relate fairly well. Schuster-Koloamatangi, a stuntman, is there the whole time under a motion-capture performance, and you can tell that there is weight to at the very least Dek’s sides of his fights. And of course setting him up as an underdog before he even sets foot on the planet was an easy move but one that does make a difference. As banal as his tragedy is, Trachtenberg communicates it efficiently -and clearly enjoys building more facets of Yautja culture, even if it is largely derivative of other fictional warrior races in sci-fi and fantasy like the Dothraki or the Klingons. Dek and his journey are luckily not so one-dimensional, his rugged individualism challenged as he likewise is forced to more closely understand the nature of this uncompromising planet.
The Badlands are very creative and well-characterized -the monsters and obstacles really unique and the terrain fittingly alien. And the biodiversity here isn't merely aesthetic or circumstantial, it is thematically crucial playing into the climax in a clever way that very dramatically communicates its anti-colonialist screed. No humans appear in this movie, but their machines -both literal and institutional- are an incredibly powerful force as Trachtenberg paints a solid dystopian portrait of capitalist resource suppression; and in relief to that an image of an ecological spectrum poised to fight back.
Some things like the sarcastic comic relief provided by Thia through the film are somewhat jarring in light of the Predator franchise writ large, typically more serious and adult than this instalment -considerably less violent than the median too- is willing to be. Trachtenberg isn't bad at writing the levity, but there is still a sense of safeness to the movie that is a touch disconcerting. It is also a touch on the shallow side in the breadth of its reliance on CG environments -for as interesting as those environments may be the stakes are just a little lessened as a result. And the film's ending is a touch too easy a resolution, necessary though its parameters may be, its execution is underwhelming.
Certainly, Predator: Badlands is no Prey -but Trachtenberg is still a curious and steady hand at the wheel of this series, pushing it into a new direction that is very appropriate; one that in humanizing the Predators more than in any prior film sets an entirely new course for the future. In an era of mass franchise homogeneity that is something to be appreciated. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
1 comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
14 comments
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more