Skip to main content

Prey Brings New Life and Vison to a Creatively Dead Franchise


When I reviewed The Predator a few years ago, I pointed out that this whole franchise got its’ start riding Aliens’ coattails and hasn’t ever been as interesting or distinct as it purports to be. And perhaps I wasn’t giving it enough credit. That first Predator is a fascinating exploration of late 80s machismo and is characterized by some pretty sharp action direction from John McTiernan; but nothing that has followed in this franchise of constant crossovers and reboots has ever justified its’ perseverance beyond that initial Schwarzeneggar vehicle …until now.
Prey, the fifth instalment of the Predator solo franchise directed by Dan Trachtenberg, has done the unexpected: its’ given this series a reason to exist. Not just because of its’ own quality, but by what it suggests can be done within the world of this alien trophy hunter stalking people to kill. This film completely upends the context of previous Predator movies by setting the story in early eighteenth century North America and in a Comanche tribe who encounter a Predator at the same time they are trying to protect themselves from colonizers. It pits the Predator against one of the most dedicated warrior cultures in our own history and the results are astoundingly rich and exciting.
The protagonist is Naru, played by Amber Midthunder in a star-making turn, an intelligent healer in her village, but quite adept at tracking -longing to be a hunter like her brother Taabe (Dakota Beavers). Constantly underestimated and desperate to prove herself, she and her loyal dog Sarii join up with a hunting party tailing a cougar when she picks up on a series of mysterious signs of some greater, stranger predator in the area.
Predation is a straight-up motif in this film, one of the few entries in the series that, as appropriate for its’ title, is more interested in the prey than the predator. It permeates across the ecosystem, the Predators’ arrival is to quite literally enter the primal food chain. A mouse is seen devoured by a snake before the snake is killed by the Predator. A little later, a rabbit is pursued by a wolf that also becomes one of the interlopers’ early kills. We know these natural animal relationships, the movie invites us to consider the Predator in relation to them. Ultimately it is an intruder on the natural order, perverts a world of survival by imposing its’ sport. And the Predator is likened, in quite blunt terms to another force of disturbance upon this land: the white man -represented here through French voyageurs. In its’ anti-colonial bent, I don’t know that the movie ever posits the French as worse than the Predator, but it does equate them an awful lot -particularly in their lack of sanctity around hunting. There’s not a high margin of distinction between the Predator killing a wolf just so it can melt off its’ flesh for a trophy skull and the French killing and skinning a herd of bison just for their hides. It’s an insult against nature either way. But the Predator at least will refrain from its’ assault if its’ prey is incapacitated or not perceived as a threat. The French make no such exceptions.
Human parallels however are not Trachtenberg’s primary concern, much as it adds layers to the films’ world and themes. His subject of interest remains Naru and her relationship to her culture’s norms, to the Predator, and to her own aspirations. In some respect she is a conventional, almost Disney protagonist: a girl who wants more for herself than what the strictures of her society place on her as a young woman. She even has her own animal companion. But there’s a fierceness to her that sets her apart, that pushes her forward in determination of proving her worth. She is incredibly intuitive and self-sufficient, which serves her well against her lack of experience. A lot of the believability to this couldn’t be found on the page, rather it emanates from Midthunder’s sharply captivating performance. She finds a cool medium in her approach, which is modern in sensibility -but not distractingly so. And she conveys greatly the weight of Naru’s convictions -you get a sense exactly what it means to her to be so undervalued, to not be perceived as a threat. It feels deliberate that Trachtenberg and Midthunder would hone in on this, knowing the skepticism and scrutiny that would surround a protagonist of this gender and background. So they keenly draw on the toll of inadequacy upon her, lending her journey stronger credence. And the result is one of the most thrilling action heroines in recent years.
Her adversary, formidable and calculating, is likewise defined in strong detail. The look of the Predator will never quite be as impressive or daunting as it was in that original movie -especially now that so many elements of its’ appearance are digitally rendered. But I respect Trachtenberg’s restraint to often show the Predator in all its’ hideous glory. It’s a much more intimidating figure when invisible, when just the outline of its’ form is going around violently causing havoc. When the mask comes off and the mandibles are out, it’s honestly less scary, maybe due to a lack of detail in design, again when compared to that original creation. As usual with Predator movies, we get several perspective shots of its’ vision, based around body heat, but I like how Trachtenberg finds ways for Naru to counteract this -specifically with potent herbs. In fact the movie in general does a great job implementing Indigenous character and methods in opposition to the Predator. We’re used to seeing guns and heavy weaponry raised to counteract this beast, but Prey instead pits spears, arrows, knives and coordinated attacks against it. They’re not a whole lot more successful, but they’re framed as worthy threats, effective, and without ever taking away from the Predators’ menace or resorting to a notion of noble primitivism in the face of advanced technology. The Predator doesn’t use a lot of high-tech weapons anyways, which checks with its’ apparent code of the sport. It wouldn’t be fair to use a bazooka when the most anyone in this era can be armed with is a musket -and yes, there is a great musket gag.
Prey is shot beautifully, mostly on Nakoda land around Calgary, and it is a travesty it wasn’t allowed to be shown on the big screen. Some lustre is clearly lost there in both the picturesque nature and vivid fight scenes reduced to a smaller format. And seeing as this may well be Hulu’s most successful movie so far, I wonder if Disney might be second-guessing that choice. In any case it is a good viewing experience, a great moment of representation (the film was shot simultaneously in Comanche, which is so cool!) and its’ a remarkable feat for a franchise that has been consistently unremarkable for decades. In terms of its’ compelling original vision, it even outpaces the 1987 film -although cheese will always work in that ones’ favour. And it’s got people talking about other unique vantage points of history to stick a Predator into, such as Medieval Europe or Edo Japan. Prey gave Predator, for the first time in its’ life, a future worth anticipating.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day