Skip to main content

Prey Brings New Life and Vison to a Creatively Dead Franchise


When I reviewed The Predator a few years ago, I pointed out that this whole franchise got its’ start riding Aliens’ coattails and hasn’t ever been as interesting or distinct as it purports to be. And perhaps I wasn’t giving it enough credit. That first Predator is a fascinating exploration of late 80s machismo and is characterized by some pretty sharp action direction from John McTiernan; but nothing that has followed in this franchise of constant crossovers and reboots has ever justified its’ perseverance beyond that initial Schwarzeneggar vehicle …until now.
Prey, the fifth instalment of the Predator solo franchise directed by Dan Trachtenberg, has done the unexpected: its’ given this series a reason to exist. Not just because of its’ own quality, but by what it suggests can be done within the world of this alien trophy hunter stalking people to kill. This film completely upends the context of previous Predator movies by setting the story in early eighteenth century North America and in a Comanche tribe who encounter a Predator at the same time they are trying to protect themselves from colonizers. It pits the Predator against one of the most dedicated warrior cultures in our own history and the results are astoundingly rich and exciting.
The protagonist is Naru, played by Amber Midthunder in a star-making turn, an intelligent healer in her village, but quite adept at tracking -longing to be a hunter like her brother Taabe (Dakota Beavers). Constantly underestimated and desperate to prove herself, she and her loyal dog Sarii join up with a hunting party tailing a cougar when she picks up on a series of mysterious signs of some greater, stranger predator in the area.
Predation is a straight-up motif in this film, one of the few entries in the series that, as appropriate for its’ title, is more interested in the prey than the predator. It permeates across the ecosystem, the Predators’ arrival is to quite literally enter the primal food chain. A mouse is seen devoured by a snake before the snake is killed by the Predator. A little later, a rabbit is pursued by a wolf that also becomes one of the interlopers’ early kills. We know these natural animal relationships, the movie invites us to consider the Predator in relation to them. Ultimately it is an intruder on the natural order, perverts a world of survival by imposing its’ sport. And the Predator is likened, in quite blunt terms to another force of disturbance upon this land: the white man -represented here through French voyageurs. In its’ anti-colonial bent, I don’t know that the movie ever posits the French as worse than the Predator, but it does equate them an awful lot -particularly in their lack of sanctity around hunting. There’s not a high margin of distinction between the Predator killing a wolf just so it can melt off its’ flesh for a trophy skull and the French killing and skinning a herd of bison just for their hides. It’s an insult against nature either way. But the Predator at least will refrain from its’ assault if its’ prey is incapacitated or not perceived as a threat. The French make no such exceptions.
Human parallels however are not Trachtenberg’s primary concern, much as it adds layers to the films’ world and themes. His subject of interest remains Naru and her relationship to her culture’s norms, to the Predator, and to her own aspirations. In some respect she is a conventional, almost Disney protagonist: a girl who wants more for herself than what the strictures of her society place on her as a young woman. She even has her own animal companion. But there’s a fierceness to her that sets her apart, that pushes her forward in determination of proving her worth. She is incredibly intuitive and self-sufficient, which serves her well against her lack of experience. A lot of the believability to this couldn’t be found on the page, rather it emanates from Midthunder’s sharply captivating performance. She finds a cool medium in her approach, which is modern in sensibility -but not distractingly so. And she conveys greatly the weight of Naru’s convictions -you get a sense exactly what it means to her to be so undervalued, to not be perceived as a threat. It feels deliberate that Trachtenberg and Midthunder would hone in on this, knowing the skepticism and scrutiny that would surround a protagonist of this gender and background. So they keenly draw on the toll of inadequacy upon her, lending her journey stronger credence. And the result is one of the most thrilling action heroines in recent years.
Her adversary, formidable and calculating, is likewise defined in strong detail. The look of the Predator will never quite be as impressive or daunting as it was in that original movie -especially now that so many elements of its’ appearance are digitally rendered. But I respect Trachtenberg’s restraint to often show the Predator in all its’ hideous glory. It’s a much more intimidating figure when invisible, when just the outline of its’ form is going around violently causing havoc. When the mask comes off and the mandibles are out, it’s honestly less scary, maybe due to a lack of detail in design, again when compared to that original creation. As usual with Predator movies, we get several perspective shots of its’ vision, based around body heat, but I like how Trachtenberg finds ways for Naru to counteract this -specifically with potent herbs. In fact the movie in general does a great job implementing Indigenous character and methods in opposition to the Predator. We’re used to seeing guns and heavy weaponry raised to counteract this beast, but Prey instead pits spears, arrows, knives and coordinated attacks against it. They’re not a whole lot more successful, but they’re framed as worthy threats, effective, and without ever taking away from the Predators’ menace or resorting to a notion of noble primitivism in the face of advanced technology. The Predator doesn’t use a lot of high-tech weapons anyways, which checks with its’ apparent code of the sport. It wouldn’t be fair to use a bazooka when the most anyone in this era can be armed with is a musket -and yes, there is a great musket gag.
Prey is shot beautifully, mostly on Nakoda land around Calgary, and it is a travesty it wasn’t allowed to be shown on the big screen. Some lustre is clearly lost there in both the picturesque nature and vivid fight scenes reduced to a smaller format. And seeing as this may well be Hulu’s most successful movie so far, I wonder if Disney might be second-guessing that choice. In any case it is a good viewing experience, a great moment of representation (the film was shot simultaneously in Comanche, which is so cool!) and its’ a remarkable feat for a franchise that has been consistently unremarkable for decades. In terms of its’ compelling original vision, it even outpaces the 1987 film -although cheese will always work in that ones’ favour. And it’s got people talking about other unique vantage points of history to stick a Predator into, such as Medieval Europe or Edo Japan. Prey gave Predator, for the first time in its’ life, a future worth anticipating.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...