Skip to main content

A Fresh Main Course, Lightly Undercooked But Suspiciously Succulent


In a word, Fresh is deranged. The debut film from Mimi Cave, which premiered a few months ago at Sundance is twisted and utterly disturbing most of the way through, but conveyed with a gleefully dark humour that ‘deranged’ seems its’ best descriptor. It was one of the big movies (the other being After Yang) that it seemed everyone out of Sundance was talking about, and I assumed this meant because of how great, unexpected and “fresh” that it was. I now understand that shock is perhaps more likely the reason for its’ sensationalism -Cave certainly finds interesting ways to make her audience uncomfortable.
This isn’t to disparage its’ exceptional qualities, Fresh is certainly smarter and more interesting than your average horror flick of this nature, particularly in how it straddles the conventions of romantic-comedy. Relative newcomer Daisy Edgar-Jones plays Noa, a young woman without much luck on the dating scene who happens to meet Steve (Sebastian Stan), a charming attractive man with whom she strikes up an instant connection. They bond at a bar, they karaoke together, they have sex and go on a weekend getaway -at which point the tables flip spectacularly. This is all preface, the movie indicating as much with its’ title card and opening credits coming a full half hour in (trying to give Drive My Car a run for its’ money, I see). It’s a twist deftly played and yet brilliantly set up, and it does require spoiling if the movie is to be discussed in any meaningful capacity.
Steve is a cannibal who kidnaps women to harvest and sell by the body part to grotesque wealthy patrons: “the one-percent of the one-percent” he says. What’s perhaps more of a shock than this reveal though is how little his demeanour and personality is distinct by it -he maintains that same charisma, that same attitude -even that same affection for Noa, whom he talks to about eating people with the same casual candour as he’d earlier discussed his family back in Texas. Suddenly all of it is rendered unsettling, the lack of any notable red flags their own red flag. I’d heard the film called a horror movie about dating and I don’t know that that’s entirely accurate (the film loses interest in the conventions of dating at about the time Noa finds herself chained to a wall), but Cave does play around with the themes and iconography of romantic-comedy a fair bit, warping them in perverse ways. Her music choices reflect this, the recurring motif of the Golden Girls theme as Noa’s ringtone, or Steve dancing to Animotion’s “Obsession” while preparing to harvest a human leg -light poppy touches that deeply contrast the subject matter yet evoke any number of clichés of the rom-com format. Consider too, the second round meet-cute over Noa’s supposed curiosity at the taste of human flesh, how Steve sincerely entertains this and how it is written with the kind of repartee reserved for the like of Nora Ephron characters -and that it comes to define their relationship for the back end of the film.
Of course what drives this disturbing dynamic and gives it its’ efficacy is the way the movie illustrates its’ material. Even before the reveal, Cave lingers intimately on her characters’ bodies, their skin, their faces -and its’ all visual language we’re used to as constituent of sexuality, romance, closeness. But like everything it is soon turned on its’ head. The meat Steve works with is shot with a similar delicacy, as though it is the height of fine dining (the meatballs he serves Noa look perfectly appetizing -a harrowing thought), interspersed with flashes of the elite clientele consuming it in high end settings. But their consumption is still slovenly, gnarled, and stomach-churning –the context making the very act of eating disgusting. At once it seems to reflect both the perspectives of Noa and Steve.
It’s bold of Cave to do such a thing, and she’s not shy about flexing her filmmaking muscle right out the gate. She develops tension pretty well through the precedent Noa finds herself in. Separated by a thin wall is another prisoner Penny (Andrea Bang) with whom she forms a relationship, and even further down is a third captive psychologically too far-gone –forming an eerie trajectory for Noa’s own condition, something exacerbated by Steve’s capacity for premature mutilation. Outside of narrative though Cave also makes a series of stark choices in her pacing and tone, and her visuals. She colours much of the film in warm glowing hues to serve her assortment of contrasts, backs up her morbid humour through not only music but slick editing –this movie has one of the best spin match cuts I’ve ever seen. Bits of her styling may feel derivative, a late-film dance sequence is lit and choreographed perhaps a bit too closely to a similar scene in Ex Machina, but there’s enough real creativity there to even things out. Certainly she has the taste (no pun intended) for this vivid imagery and a gruesome sense of irony.
Unfortunately, the film isn’t as tight as it ought to be, the detours into the suspicions of Noa’s friend Mollie (Jonica T. Gibbs) aren’t very substantive or compelling, and feel like a weaker version of the Lil Rel subplot from Get Out. The film would have been much better served giving some of this time over to Steve’s wife, played by Charlotte Le Bon in a rather thankless role that for whatever reason Cave decided not to expand on (and there’s a curious, disturbing implication there well worth delving into). Instead, she mostly just facilitates one major plot beat (and it could have easily been achieved another way) before becoming completely superfluous -a background actor with no real stakes behind her. One of the functions she is put to is to drag out the climax, which is overlong and stuffed with false endings eating away at whatever tension or catharsis was built into it. Everyone is palpably tired by the time it does conclude, where it could have landed more solidly had it cut out some ten minutes earlier than it does.
It sputters at the end certainly, and yet Fresh is still rather impressive. I appreciate the swings it takes, especially as a debut, most of them working out fairly well. And there is something provoking about its’ attitude to relationships and dating, sure as it is to dissuade its’ audience from either of those things (or at least the heterosexual variety). Jones is a promising discovery and Stan fits perfectly this charismatic yet horrifying stud. It doesn’t all fit together seamlessly, but the effort is enough to stick in your mind, to leave an aftertaste that I’m sure Mimi Cave would find just delectable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day