Skip to main content

Deus Ex Machina?

              Original science fiction movies don’t come along very much. Most that we see whether they be superhero movies, space operas like Guardians of the Galaxy, or even attempts at exploring a high concept or idea like Interstellar, aren’t very original. And there are definitely aspects of Ex Machina that aren’t original, that have been seen and explored before. But what makes Ex Machina different is how it takes these somewhat familiar concepts like A.I. and restricts them to a confined setting and few characters and it works wonders creating a thrilling narrative and a gripping work of speculative fiction.
                Caleb (Domhnall Gleeson) is a coding programmer working for the movie equivalent of Google who wins a contest to spend a week at the secretive home/lab of the company’s reclusive CEO Nathan (Oscar Isaac). Once he arrives he finds there’s a catch: that he has to administer the Turing test on Nathan’s new robotic creation Ava (Alicia Vikander) to prove that it really is an A.I. But during tests Caleb communicates and forms a relationship with Ava while she hints that something is not all right at the facility and especially with Nathan.
                First-time director Alex Garland has previous experience as the screenwriter of 28 Days Later and Never Let Me Go and he brings the same intensity to this film. He creates an unsettling atmosphere and air of mystery but also cautious intrigue and amazement as we like Caleb discover more about Ava. There are only four characters in Caleb, Nathan, Ava, and Nathan’s housemaid Kyoko (Sonoya Mizuno), and so the film is very dependent on their performances. Gleeson and Isaac who will be appearing together in Star Wars: The Force Awakens later this year are very compelling. Gleeson captures the curiosity and often naivety of this guy seeing technology and ingenuity he’s never before witnessed, while Isaac radiates an unnerving compulsiveness and off-kilter attitude. But the standout is Vikander who emanates a real sense of the unknown getting just the right level of ambiguity for her character and her situation. Garland also wrote the screenplay and it’s exceptionally good where even in the points of low action the dialogue between Caleb and Nathan or Caleb and Ava is fascinating and magnetic.
                The film’s style you can tell is heavily influenced. While there are moments that feel reminiscent of something from Cronenberg or Danny Boyle (Garland has written a few of Boyle’s films), to me it felt a lot like something from Stanley Kubrick. Kubrick had of course developed the film A.I. Artificial Intelligence and had come up with a number of its plot points before he died and his friend Steven Spielberg took over. That film didn’t turn out as well as was hoped, but this feels a lot closer to the kind of A.I. film Kubrick would actually have made. Largely because Garland utilizes a lot of his style. The editing and transitions of ‘Sessions’ really hearkens back to The Shining one of my favourite horror movies, as does the small cast, slow but tense build, and isolated setting. But there are aspects too like the recurring absence of sound and score that echo 2001: A Space Odyssey and sexual undertones familiar to A Clockwork Orange. Hell Nathan’s constant monitoring of the compound feels a lot like HAL 9000.
                But perhaps the best aspect of this film is how it keeps you guessing. The story takes some very unexpected twists and turns and everything is stranger than it may initially seem. A few of these from the tonal and character hints you can guess, but others take you completely by surprise. There’s a creepiness to the situation and character actions. The way in which Nathan was able to program Ava’s intelligence is particularly creepy. You’re often in the same boat as Caleb, not sure who to trust and determined to find out what’s really going on. And the film’s structure makes even little things really tense. The guessing doesn’t stop with the end credits. The ending certainly raises questions itself and is the perfect conclusion to such an eerie experience. For a film called Ex Machina it certainly doesn’t end with a Deus Ex Machina! It’s an edge-of-your-seat thriller that just happens to also be a creative sci-fi story.
                Ex Machina is a tremendous film that acts as a brilliant speculative fiction, as suspenseful as it is creative with an unpredictable narrative, characters, and motivations that make you uneasy in all the right ways. And after seeing something like Jurassic World, it’s also great to see CGI that looks convincing and is integrated flawlessly. The acting, writing, and just overall execution of this film is superb. When a film leaves an impression on you that you just can’t sway, you know it did something really right, and Ex Machina is going to be in my head for weeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day