Skip to main content

Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom: A Visceral Imputation on the White Ownership of Black Artistry


For as long as black people have been making music, white people have been stealing and appropriating it. Country, Blues, Jazz, Rock ‘n Roll, Hip-Hop -the black architects of each of these have been popularly forgotten in favour of the white artists who came in their succession, incorporating (consciously or not) the styles and techniques innovated by black creatives. And the reason for this is because while these genres were built by and for black people, they were (and still largely are) sold to white people, and had to be if ever the artists were to make a profit -at least according to the white men who governed the American music industry. Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom opens on a scene of the titular singer, nicknamed the “Mother of the Blues” (Viola Davis) performing in 1927 in a rural field somewhere in the American South to an audience of enthusiastic black spectators, clearly in-tune with the culture and parlance being expressed through her song. It’s not a spoiler to say that the film ends with a band of white men, all completely interchangeable, in a recording studio a few years later performing a similar song, the cadence and attitude of which they don’t in the least understand, to an audience presumably (if the record is successful) of thousands of white listeners.
This is the principal theme to Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, an adaptation of August Wilson’s award-winning 1982 play, set almost entirely in a Chicago recording booth, as Ma Rainey and her band prepare for her new record. It’s an artistic choice that she was pressured into by her white manager (Jeremy Shamos), and comes at a very heated time for her band (figuratively and literally -it’s an extremely hot day). She is tired, irresponsible, and unreasonable, and her band is falling apart mostly due to to the showboating and improvisation of her fiercely ambitious trumpeter Levee (the late Chadwick Boseman) -a constant thorn in her side.
Like a lot of movies adapted from plays, there isn’t a ton of cinematic versatility, the action being confined to a single day and space, as permitting a medium that is carried entirely by actors and their strength of performance. It is very easy to compare to the last August Wilson movie adaptation, Denzel Washingtons’ Fences, in part due to the ubiquity of Wilsons’ dialogue and the presence of Davis (who won her Oscar for the aforementioned film), but also because like that film it has no interest in hiding its’ theatrical roots. Plot is moved along strictly through character, the sets are notably claustrophobic, the staging incredibly deliberate, and there’s even a fairly obvious Chekhov’s gun. For direction, Tony-winning Broadway theatre alum George C. Wolfe was chosen, and he approaches the film accordingly like a play, though with some smart visual choices that do give it a greater energy, and actually allow it to be more dynamic than I found Fences. The camera really moves with the actors in flexible ways and the sense of confinement is much more thematically evocative -the band is forced to rehearse in a crummy basement room of the recording studio.
Though this is one of the bigger signs, the movie is filled with such details and small micro-aggressions that reinforce the power dynamic at play, particularly in what might otherwise be a comical relationship between Ma and her manager. She very much appears to have the power in the relationship, she’s the star and her needs must be met, and he needs her more than she needs him. But at the end of the day he still has sway over her, he still dictates the terms of her art. The band have a different attitude to the white authority figures they don’t have to interact with as often as Ma, jokingly chastising Levee, who’s much younger than them and talks a big game about his songwriting skills, personal autonomy, and starting his own band, for seemingly sucking up to the white boss and using the phrase “yes sir”. But that is what touches a nerve and ignites a deeply harrowing conversation about racism that recurs throughout the film, often in the form of stories, some personal, some anecdotal, related by the bandmates.
It’s here that I have to applaud one of the best casts of a movie this year. Viola Davis is superb as Ma, effortlessly resurrecting this influential singer in as powerhouse a way as you would expect, yet often drenched in sweat and excessive makeup that highlights her impropriety. And she can belt out a tune as good as any prohibition-era vaudevillian. Colman Domingo, Glynn Turman, and Michael Potts are each great as the veteran musicians sharing a stupendous chemistry, Domingo and Turman especially stealing a couple scenes. But more often than not those scenes belong to Chadwick Boseman, and so does the movie, as the recently deceased superhero delivers maybe his greatest performance in his last on-screen role.
As the impetuous hot-shot of the group, and the avatar for a younger generation of African-American artists in conflict with the older generation represented by Ma and the other players, Boseman captivates you from his first frame and never relinquishes his grip. His energy and boundless self-confidence is addictive (as is his glorious smile), but so too is his deep and impassioned fury, his pent-up pain allowed expression through the direction of his exchanges with his bandmates and the white producers who control his fate, and also the constrained emotionality glimpsed when removed from their company. Levee is just a really great role, Davis called it the best for a black actor -and Boseman completely lives up to it and then some. Calling it now, he will win an Oscar for it; and between this and Da 5 Bloods, it’s all the more tragic that he is no longer with us in a year that would have been his.
He excels in the scenes of horrible recollections of racist violence as well as in those of him seducing Ma’s girlfriend (Taylour Paige), or asserting the superiority of his arrangement of the Black Bottom, or mocking Ma’s poor nephew (Dusan Brown) whom she insists on introducing her song in spite of a debilitating stammer. There really is a lot going on within that small building, a lot of themes being discussed in Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom; from theology (black peoples’ relationship to the tenets of white Christianity), to police discrimination, to discreet homosexuality, and even commentary on the fading jug band music scene (as Levee improperly calls it) and the rise of jazz. But all of it of course is wrapped in the culture of white supremacy, and how much Ma, Levee, and the rest are inescapably under its’ thumb.
It doesn’t matter how fancy your shoes are, they’re still the ones making you dance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...