Skip to main content

Building on Fences


          Few films have dealt with racial tensions of the mid-twentieth century like Fences does. In that the racial troubles that permeated the 1950s looms over the story but isn’t its main focus. That focus is on something more intimate: the character and attitudes of a black family living in Pittsburgh during this time.
          Troy Waxson (Denzel Washington) is a garbage-man earning just enough to provide for his family, his wife Rose (Viola Davis) and son Cory (Jovan Adepo). He has an older son Lyons (Russell Hornsby) an aspiring musician often borrowing money from his father, and a brother Gabe (Mykelti Williamson) who was injured during the war and is now mentally handicapped. The drama comes from Cory determining to become a football player rather than finding a job with sustainable income that his father wants, as well as Troy’s other habits that work to crumble his family relationships.
          Fences is based on a play by August Wilson; a critically acclaimed Tony and Pullitzer Prize winning play at that, and it shows. The plot is incredibly dialogue-driven, a lot of it through Troy’s speeches, and often is written to sound more pointed and grandiose than how people actually talk. The story’s also very long-winded in this regard and almost entirely set in the one house on one of three sets. There are a couple brief scenes away from it that were obviously written into the movie. I have to believe apart from these that this is an incredibly close adaptation. And that’s easily the largest flaw. It feels like you’re watching a play rather than a movie the whole way through. Nothing about this film is particularly cinematic, the medium isn’t used to any significance. There’s no visual sense, and the directing from star Washington often feels like its on autopilot. The cast who seem to be the same as in the play, are just acting their parts out the way they did there.
          But for that, this is a good cast. Washington is really good in the lead, delivering a strong, not always likeable, but tragic performance. The scenes between him and his son are particularly powerful, and prime instances of the writing actually complimenting a scene. It helps too that Troy is a pretty interesting character. He’s rough and commanding but also worn and weary. The film gives us his whole backstory including an attempt himself to become a sports star, and it adds dimension to this alcoholic who’s not as content as he’d like his friends and family to believe. The stand-out though is Viola Davis, whose performance here is possibly the best of her career. There’s an equally tragic nuance in how she subtly plays the doting wife and in her impassioned sequences later when it all bubbles out, is utterly fantastic. Williamson, Adepo, Hornsby, and Stephen McKinley Henderson as Troy’s old friend Jim Bono play their parts very skilfully too. Williamson in particular captures a few minor details that make his character’s condition resonate realistically, and Adepo plays Cory’s conflict with his father very impressively.
          As I noted before it’s a curious thing that this movie tackles racism without really doing so openly. Almost no white characters appear on screen and though race is brought up as a factor in how small a chance Cory has of making it as a football star, for the most part it’s played down. The racial theme is present merely in the environment, and how the characters interact which is very refreshing. This film and the play it’s based on is very clearly about the black experience of the 1950s and by its very nature, it’s contradiction to the white experience. You can’t separate the divergent identities even though the movie doesn’t explicitly focus on them.
          Fences is named as such for the fence around his yard that Troy spends most of the film either building or procrastinating on, and it’s of course also an obvious allegory for the barrier he’s building with his family. Again, very much a stage-play trope, but it is admittedly a worthwhile metaphor for Troy’s character and development.
          Though it’s got great performances, you won’t get anything more out of Fences on the screen than you would on stage. Either it doesn’t translate well or wasn’t adapted enough, and because of this it can feel very slow and unappealing. The stuff the movie does right in its themes as well as the weight of the story itself and character motivations makes it definitely worth checking out if you’re interested in the subject matter. But I can’t help thinking this must have been great play turned into a just decent movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...