Skip to main content

An Explosive Comedy and Uncanny Comfort for Bleak Times


“What are we gonna do now… in this plastic world.” “I think this is our life now.”
I know it seems like we see the pandemic everywhere. And that we’re that much eager to find comparisons and allusions in popular culture as a way of getting through it. I’ve done my fair share. And it’s true that some media that has come out during this time reads a particular way or feels especially relevant in light of the context it’s coming out in. That said, there is no movie that is more eerily on the mark than Brian Duffields’ black comedy directing debut Spontaneous -which often feels impossibly like a deliberate commentary on the pandemic from before it began.
It also takes a very silly premise, an outbreak of spontaneous combustion in a high school senior class, and considers it both with morbid humour and a melancholy sincerity -because the movie is so obviously not about spontaneous combustion. Katherine Langford plays Mara, a brash and cynical stoner with a very irony-saturated attitude, who begins seeing Charlie Plummer’s clever and charismatic (though understated) Dillon, after he openly admits to a crush on her in the aftermath of their first classmate’s death. Previously shy about it, his new-found confidence is owing to the situation of uncertainty that any moment could be their last. And this is a big theme throughout the movie as their romance develops. There’s no knowing if one of them will be next so they try to make each moment count (hence the double meaning of the title) as they psychologically grapple with what’s happening to their classmates.
I have little doubt that the allegory the filmmakers were going for was probably the ongoing school shootings crisis in the U.S., where now children are growing up with that fear of being gunned down any day as a normalized aspect of the public education system. It’s certainly tangible in the scenes of panic after someone explodes or in the funerals the class attends, or in the school photo device used after someone dies (that is honestly pretty similar in function to the ‘confessional’ sequences of The Broken Hearts Gallery). But with the condition being treated in-film as a virus and even the word “pandemic” being dropped a few times, it’s uncanny how closely this movie speaks to our culture right now.
And not even the scenes of kids in quarantine, the isolation that they feel, or the mourning of those lost to this dramatic disease, but the attempts at adaptation, the mental, existential toll it takes on teenagers losing good friends, and especially the larger public reaction. Spontaneous seemed to predict to some degree the uselessness of the American response to COVID, where politicians attempt to comfort with empty platitudes and no concrete plans (though at least nobody tries to downplay the scourge in this film). There’s even an effort to get the students back to class before anything substantive has been found on the outbreak, and of course in the meantime the students find ways of coping through humour and gradual adjustment to a new normal. Again, you can see how all this lines up to the intended metaphor, but it’s impossible not to notice the reflection of 2020, and the movie is perhaps richer for being more relevant than it meant to be.
Most cuttingly though is the anxiety and uncertainty we see expressed through Mara’s perception of it all -she was sat behind the first victim in class. And Duffield presents her stylishly through a sardonic voiceover narration and glimpses into her mind, memory, and speculations. Even Dillons’ expositions are sometimes filtered through this lens of meta-reference and subjectivity. It’s a quirky way of incorporating a standard narration device for Y/A adaptations and threads the films’ tonal divergences succinctly, allowing for the film to be both genuinely bleak and bleakly funny. As it happens, that lines up with Mara’s personality and the points where she connects with Dillon. Langford and Plummer are very good, and have a wonderfully charming relationship -at times almost too perfect. It’s very reminiscent of the relationship at the heart of Brett Haley’s All the Bright Places earlier this year and runs into a few of the same thematic and narrative points, but plays them with much more competence. There’s a point in the film where the personal psychological trauma gets severe enough that you forget it was a comedy. It begins addressing loss and depression and ennui with an unmistakable honesty that hits very close to home right now. And it wasn’t all jokes before -in fact there’s one harrowing scene in a car at about the midpoint- but Duffield understands the need to highlight this particular kind of emotional turmoil and do his best to offer some kind of relief for it.
Of course he can’t really. Everyone knows that who’s lost loved ones to the pandemic or a school shooting or similar mass tragedy. But he gives us something to think about regardless in how we process such things -especially if we haven’t the firsthand experience. The spontaneous combustion does come to an end, but it leaves the survivors in just as uncertain a place as when it was raging. There’s a great epilogue, underlined by more snarkiness, which speaks with frustration to the current state of the U.S.; but also forms a thesis of sorts on how to find meaning in life after great loss, less All the Bright Places, more About Time. It’s something we’re all wondering. There may be impracticality to some of Mara’s future plans, but I can’t say the confidence and lust for life with which she envisions them isn’t attractive.
More than any other film to come out during this pandemic, Spontaneous understands it and what we’re collectively going through because of it. The love, laughs, sincerity, solemnity, and hope it provides are a comfort. An accidental miracle of a movie.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...