Skip to main content

Unique Tesla Movie Goes Against the Current


Tesla is the second time this year I've seen an ostensible biopic explicitly break the rules of and re-contextualize the form of the biopic. Michael Almereyda's film on the career of Nikola Tesla is adapted from a script he wrote over twenty years ago for Jerzy Skolimowski that never came to fruition; and in his return to it, he takes an unusually avant-garde approach to the subject of addressing the life of this crucial but mysterious figure in the history of electrical engineering and modern technology. Within the film, there is the history and a thesis on Tesla himself, though it is presented through relentlessly curious narrative, structural, and visual choices. It is perhaps less successful than Josephine Decker's Shirley in this regard, and may not wholly work for all its' ambition, but it is terrifically fascinating nonetheless.
Almereyda's cited influences on the film include Derek Jarman, Henry James, and Drunk History of all things. I haven't read much James admittedly and I didn't watch Drunk History (though I can certainly spot where the movie is pulling from its' loose reality fabric). However, I can see Jarman all over this film. Most of it is shot indoors by a light source often of the early electrical variety that Tesla and Thomas Edison innovated, and with operative framing reminiscent of Caravaggio or Jarman's Tempest. Abstract shots set in exterior environments will usually compose Tesla against a matte painting with appropriate colour grading to convey his movement in the outside world. And perhaps most stylistically captivating of all, Almereyda has a compatible interest in anachronism pertaining to the speculative aspects of the story and its' framing device. On occasion, the film is interrupted by its narrator Anne Morgan (a sharp and stunning Eve Hewson), daughter of industrialist J.P. and a love interest of Tesla's, who illustrates points with the aid of google and powerpoint -as though she were a student giving a presentation or a guide in a museum. She is our historian, directly addressing us, and carefully leading us through the film and the relevant chapters of Tesla's life, dropping in hypotheticals or extrapolations now and again. And there's something quaint in the film acknowledging its own artificiality in this way, like a life story written for the stage while still utilizing precise cinematic language in its' expression.
This is where the film is utterly astounding. In the same way that Rocketman employed magical realism to heighten the emotionality of its' musical sequences, Tesla draws remarkable parallels to the world that has grown out of his ingenuity. There's a distinct modernism to how the film illustrates the trajectory of Tesla's career, as our world intrudes on his own, often for important thematic punctuation. Sometimes it takes the form of Edison scrolling through a smartphone in the background of a scene, other times it's an awesome interlude of Tesla himself singing a British New Wave classic that epitomizes his state of mind. With the exception of his initial magnifying transmitter test in Colorado, many of the momentous episodes from his life are left off-screen in ellipses.
That creative choice however, was probably not the right one. Part of the appeal in watching a movie about Tesla is seeing the discoveries and inventions themselves rather than merely the business of acquiring patents or talking about the scientific theory and physics of it all. There's that whole belief he could communicate with Mars that formed the backbone of a pretty good Doctor Who episode earlier this year, here only mentioned for the modest damage it was doing to his reputation and his chances at obtaining future financing. We don’t ultimately get to know much about Tesla’s process, and those not already aware of who he was and what he did might have difficulty ascertaining how he is so significant. One of the few battlegrounds in the so-called “current wars” we do see in some detail is the innovation of electrical current as a form of execution and the ethical ramifications of that. Edison is against capital punishment, but it doesn’t stop him from trying to patent electrocution for himself -despite Tesla’s alternating currents being better suited for this already gruesome use of the new technology.
Almereyda reunites with the stars of his 2000 Hamlet for this movie, with Ethan Hawke in the title role and Kyle MacLachlan as Edison. MacLachlan definitely fits the old world capitalist, whom he infuses with suitable pettiness and arrogance, but a degree of genuine scientific brilliance as well. In light of Tesla’s contemporary popularity, the image of Edison can sometimes morph into that of a nineteenth century Elon Musk, merely taking the credit for the geniuses he exploits (the irony of Musk and his Tesla is not lost in that analogy) -but this film doesn’t do that. Hawke of course is excellent, playing Tesla with reservation but infinite depth that is belied in a handful of moments allowed to escape his customary silence and introverted personality. He never seems to be living only in the moment, but constantly considering the future, and the future of his work -one of the only things he holds in exceptionally high regard and takes absolute pride in. It’s a solemn performance, a sad one even.
There’s a reverence for Tesla in this movie that recollects that of Van Gogh in Loving Vincent -though of course Tesla is very much alive through the story it is telling. And yet I can’t quite bring myself to endorse the film wholeheartedly. Perhaps because a lot of its’ artistic choices are more interesting than they are enthralling. As visually and stylistically exceptional as the movie is, there’s not much character to it -it does play better as a history lesson, its’ interiors and low budget especially giving it the feel at times of a Heritage Canada Moment. Or maybe the dim spaces and near-absence of an outside world reflect too closely the claustrophobia of our pandemic reality. But the uniqueness of its designs and many of its executions is enough for me to recommend Tesla. For sure it is a dose of freshness in the environment of increasing mundanity that is the biopic genre. And perhaps like with Tesla himself, appreciation will grow with time. I cannot say this will be the only time I watch it.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day