Skip to main content

No Sympathy for the Devil


The Devil All the Time is one of those titles that is clearly cropped from some larger context. It is in fact from a line in Donald Ray Pollock’s book: “It seemed to his son that his father fought the devil all the time.” It’s a statement of psychological torment and the lingering effects of trauma, but removed from the rest of the line, “the Devil All the Time” has no meaning. I can’t speak to Pollock’s 2011 novel, but for the 2020 film adaptation recently released to Netflix, this comprehensive (and grammatical) senselessness makes it the perfect title.
Directed by Antonio Compos and starring a weirdly impressive ensemble cast considering the material, The Devil All the Time is a relentlessly bleak portrait of a number of lives in rural Ohio in the decades following the Second World War. It is populated with monstrous characters seemingly in competition over who can be the worst human being and takes delight in the misery they inflict -like if you crossed Magnolia with one of those grisly Victorian penny dreadfuls and transplanted it in the American Northeast of the mid-twentieth century. It’s a thoroughly unpleasant movie, which is fine. What’s less forgivable is how meaningless it all is.
Narrated with an ironic folksiness by Pollock himself in a voice disturbingly reminiscent of Mitch McConnell, the film tells about five or six mostly overlapping stories across two generations around Knockemstiff, Ohio (which yes, is a real place) that occasionally intersect or are connected in unfortunate ways. There’s a traumatized Second World War veteran unsuccessfully trying to circumvent death in his life, his son desperate to prove his toughness and protect his adopted sister, a piously delusional preacher, a pair of necrophile serial killers, and a corrupt cop on the payroll of sleazy politicians. And the films’ most notable asset is how they cast each of these parts with prominent actors, some of whom are stepping significantly outside their type. Tom Holland is the starkest example of this, completely casting aside the nice and nerdy teen archetype he’s known for in Spider-Man movies in favour of a brutish and violent-minded country boy eager to join the army. It’s not a role that particularly suits him, he’s trying too hard, struggling with the accent, and though his character beats up and kills a number of people, he never sells it. Next to Caleb McLaughlins’ turn in Concrete Cowboy, which I saw recently, it’s not as strong a transition into an adult role.
His and the other performances, some good some bad, but each to the same impression of the regional accent (which ranges from slight to parody), are mostly lost to the subject matter and the novel opportunities it provides for the actors –many of whom seem to be in the film just to play something disturbing. Do you want to see Bill SkarsgÃ¥rd crucify a dog? How about Harry Melling dumping a box of spiders over his head? Would you like to watch Jason Clarke brutally murder a hitchhiker, or Robert Pattinson just be a paedophile? And to some degree it works, there’s a morbid interest in seeing these actors play despicable or deranged people –Melling, as he was in The Old Guard, is enormously fun for example. But there’s not much beyond the shallow gimmick. That seems particularly apparent in Sebastian Stans’ storyline, a little more removed from the others, which starts in a place of no consequence and ends in a place of even less. Ultimately, none of the stories amount to much of anything, and the characters themselves (with the possible exception of Hollands’ Arvin) are mere empty vessels for grimness and grisly deeds.
At least the male characters are. The female characters are too bereft of agency to even have that. Moreso, the film has a notably misogynistic attitude towards the women of its story. Not only are major actresses like Haley Bennet and Mia Wasikowska wasted in extremely insubstantial roles, but just about unanimously the women of this film, never the morally reprehensible figures their male counterparts are, are fridged in brutal ways. The particular fate of Eliza Scanlens’ young innocent especially is tinged with a cruel irony unbefitting the pleasure Pollock takes in describing it. The only woman in the movie allowed any semblance of a narrative of her own is Riley Keough’s unenthusiastic partner to Clarke’s perverse killer; though even she isn’t spared the bitter whims of this sexually toxic world.
There might be something to this, some comment or idea, but Pollock and Compos aren’t interested in it. The Devil All the Time has no statement, no identity beyond simple shock value and the gleefully inappropriate folkish whimsy apparent in the light musical motifs and over-abundance of banal narration. Plenty of opportunities present themselves for deeper thematic inspection or for some level of social, cultural, psychological, or religious interrogation, but the film avoids them every one. It doesn’t have anything to say on the subject of its’ characters’ evils beyond a possible sins-of-the-father convention or that human beings sure can be rotten sometimes. The movie can barely make the effort to even be nihilistic -that it seems is an identity too strong for it. Perhaps Compos thinks The Devil All the Time can get by on its’ subversiveness, but beyond the casting choices nothing in the film is all that subversive. It would need to be challenging first. This movie exists for the sake of its actors -a few of them anyway, to let them play up a kind of vileness they may not be expected to otherwise. There’s entertainment in that. But it’s the kind that derives from Tom Holland and Robert Pattinson trying to convey a tense situation in a church through goofy accents. It’s an amusement only, as vacant and fleeting as this entire movie. 

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the cartoonis

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening scenes are extrao