Skip to main content

Concrete Cowboy and the Black Heritage of Horsemanship


I am very shocked that there is not a single needle drop of “Old Town Road” anywhere in Concrete Cowboy. It would be extremely obvious, but also I feel fitting.
Concrete Cowboy, based on the novel Ghetto Cowboy by G. Neri is a movie that delves deep into an environment and culture I didn’t know existed, and a lot of people don’t. Black urban cowboys, rearing and training horses in North Philadelphia, have been around since before the age of automobiles and continue to have a small but distinct presence in the city. Similar organizations exist in other major cities throughout the United States, but it was Philadelphia’s Fletcher Street Urban Riding Club that caught the attention of director Ricky Staub, who subsequently brought the movie idea to producers Lee Daniels and Idris Elba. It’s a curious thing to shine a spotlight on and raise awareness to, and a curious story to go along with it.
Elba headlines the film as Harp, the rough and forthright man in charge of the riding club, living in a poor little home with a horse in the sitting room; but the story really belongs to Cole, played by Stranger Things’ Caleb McLaughlin, his delinquent and estranged teenage son sent to live with him from Detroit. For McLaughlin, the role represents his first foray into real adult cinema, and he brings a performance to match, one that carries the movie. Leaving far behind the fun, nerdy kid from his hit Netflix series, he plays the troubled young miscreant here with a searing honesty and palpable depth. There are certainly staples of the former-child-actor-transitioning-to-adult-roles vehicle to this part, such as drug use and copious swearing, but it’s absolutely right in context, McLaughlin illustrating terrifically the emotional and social place that Cole comes from, and the necessity of his growth in the influence of this troupe of well-meaning cowboys. In particular there’s a boy and his pet narrative weaved through this, as Cole ends up bonding with the most difficult horse in his fathers’ stable, a white colt called Boo. It’s a very traditional character arc, but one executed here with finesse and real meaning behind every advancement. The more comfortable Cole gets around Boo and in this unique company, the closer he is to its’ heritage, to finding purpose and belonging, and avoiding the pitfalls of drug dealing and petty crime that have largely consumed his friend Smush (Jharrel Jerome).
Cole is pulled in these two directions over the course of the movie, by Smush on the one hand who understands him, and by his father on the other who wants a more responsible life for the son he barely knows. There’s a need to reconnect with his dad, and the movie explores that relationship in some interesting ways. Outside of a couple scenes of confrontational or emotional reckoning, it’s something that’s kept almost in the background of the movie -Elba is in far less of it than the promotional material would have you believe. A lot of what Harp does that is most effective in improving that bond is through his cowboys as a unit -sitting around a campfire together talking about the history of black horsemen, standing together to reign in Boo, or hosting a rodeo. The more personal scenes between the two are great of course, Elba reminding us after Cats why he is actually a good actor. But the familial warmth of the Riding Club itself is as big a factor in their coming together as the personal moments they share, and that’s impressively unique for this kind of movie.
Lorraine Toussaint and Byron Bowers play a couple of these riders, but most are cast with actual Philadelphia cowboys making their acting debuts, including Ivannah Mercedes as a possible love interest for Cole, and Jamil Prattis as a handicapped trainer who actually has a pretty substantial role. Method Man is in the film as well, as a cop who used to ride with the Fletcher Street gang, now burdened as a kind of mediator between them and the city officials who want to shut them down. This and the other banal plot points and generally conventional direction of the film are its weakest aspects. While the relationships Cole cultivates with Boo and his father are presented in fresher ways, the overall compass of the film is still relatively standard, and the story has to work to really be interesting. The movie also struggles with its purpose, frequently feeling like a spotlight on one particular organization over a whole forgotten culture that exists in the margins of American urban centres. There’s also the fact that the book Concrete Cowboys is based on (and which frankly has a better title) was YA, and that shows through in the general pluckiness of the plot and the very teen-resonant major themes. But the movie feels like its’ trying too hard to be adult, aging up Cole for one, and really honing in on the grimness of the atmosphere of crime he finds himself comfortable in with Smush. These things don’t derail the film, but they do at times feel like if Free Willy had come with a drug dealing subplot.
As far as I can tell, this was Ricky Staub’s first feature, and it’s not bad, if his direction is a little stale. The fascinating world it presents is definitely worth exhibition and it takes a couple compelling new approaches to old character journeys. Elba is good, lending weight and legitimacy, but this is McLaughlins’ movie, and he proves more than up to the challenge for future starring roles. Concrete Cowboys is yet to pick up a distributor but I hope it finds one soon. There is a lot of love that was poured into it, as the end credits interviews with the Fletcher Street Club members show. There’s a legacy there that ought not be ignored; and as much as the film is a blatant plea to keep this club around, I can’t say it doesn’t demonstrate a good argument.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...