Movies as audacious and experimental as Cats come out of Hollywood about once in a generation. And
especially in a time when major studios are only concerned with safe bets, it’s
a miracle that a movie like this was made. On the one hand there is the factor
of the idea being a tested property: a long-running, successful musical from
Andrew Lloyd Webber (based in turn on a series of poems by T.S. Eliot). And
that the digital technology could be innovative on a level to attract large
audiences. But on the other hand, Cats
is a show so abstract and ridiculous and famously incomprehensible where the
novelty and energy really can only hope to work in an intimate theatre setting,
that a movie adaptation can be nothing other than an awful idea. However, I am
so glad that Tom Hooper, esteemed director of The Kings’ Speech and Les
Miserables decided to make the movie in spite of that.
Cats is a mesmerizing anomaly, one of the
few movies in recent memory that had me grinning from ear to ear for its first
twenty minutes (and again at various points throughout the film). From the very
start it forecasts itself as a deeply weird and bewildering experience unlike
anything else we’ve encountered in a cinema for years. Nothing in it quite
works but everything is so passionately bold, that you can’t help but admire
it. As a work of cinema, Cats is a
terrible, awful movie, and yet I’ve enjoyed few films this year more.
There’s barely a plot so to speak, the story being moved
along through songs almost all of which are merely introducing various cats
each with the end goal of becoming “the Jellicle Choice”, which essentially
will allow them to ascend to heaven and reincarnate. Apart from this, there’s
no momentum or general direction, not much in the way of world-building or
character development through any of the musicals’ wholly meaningless songs,
and only one consistent point of view in the form of the mostly passive Victoria
the white cat (Royal Ballet star Francesca Hayward), leaving it difficult to
invest seriously in anything. Cats has
more in common with a ballet than traditional narrative cinema, it’s all about
the spontaneity of the moment unique to live performance that cinema cannot
replicate, and the movie is constantly struggling to find a way to bridge that
divide. In the meantime, the film feels like an especially high budget
dramatization of the most whimsical childrens’ picture book, designed to teach
kids about different animals –only they’re all cats, and very very strange
cats.
Much has been said about the CGI in this movie used to merge
human actors and general cat anatomy (though with maintained human hands, feet,
and body shapes) into a single hybrid monstrosity. Yes, these creatures are
unnerving and creepy, but just as alluring for those same reasons. You can’t
take your eyes off Dame Judi Dench (as Old Deuteronomy) and her whiskers
looking like a female Cowardly Lion, or Sir Ian McKellen (as Gus the Theatre
Cat) licking milk out of a bowl and saying “Meow”. And of course the
fetishistic nature of such cat-people can’t be avoided, all the actors and
dancers’ skin-tight suits being digitally modified to look like fur, and thus
you have a cast of practically naked characters elaborately leaping, gyrating
and frolicking around with somewhat uncomfortable yet absolutely intentional sexuality:
a film tailor-made for furries.
The brazenness of this just makes it more enrapturing though,
it’s unabashed commitment with darling sincerity to characters like Rum Tum
Tugger (a hilariously committed Jason Derulo) and Bustopher Jones (a typically
unfunny James Corden). There is a villain of the piece, the mysterious and
envious Macavity, played by Idris Elba in one of his most humiliating
performances, though an astonishing Ray Winstone as Growltiger might challenge
him. Alongside Rebel Wilson (as housecat Jennyanydots) and her shockingly
horrible ad libs, Taylor Swift (as Bombalurina), Steven McRae (as Skimbleshanks
the Railway Cat), and Laurie Davidson (as Mr. Mistoffelees the magician), it’s
Jennifer Hudson as the sad and forsaken Grizabella who’s trying the hardest and
who through the musicals’ most famous song, “Memory”, Hooper is desperately
trying to milk the same Oscar-calibre performance he got out of Anne Hathaway
in Les Mis.
Speaking of which, as one of the films’ general positives,
Hooper has learned how to properly shoot a musical. He doesn’t shy away from
wide shots, uses almost no Dutch angles, and is fairly dynamic in capturing the
dance sequences and following and editing them with the right amount of
ecstatic energy. The production design is also very impressive, consisting of
giant and surreal sets that are colourful and vibrant. But these instances of
competence are still outnumbered by a bevy of inarticulate filmmaking blunders.
Cats aren’t the only human-animals we see in the film, and the non-felines that
aren’t consistently to scale are much scarier. As much as some of the song
sequences are shot well and interestingly, others employ utterly bizarre
choices, such as jump-cutting to close-ups of Rum Tum Tugger during his song as
though it were a party anthem, or repeatedly chopping the last song up so that
the movie feels like it has almost as many fake out endings as The Return of the King. The pacing is
abysmal in places, particularly in the awkward pauses between numbers (or in a
couple cases, within numbers), the tone can get unevenly dark or darkly comic,
and many of the films’ shots, lighting choices and compositions almost seem
like Hooper intentionally chose the most disturbing take from the rushes.
All of these failures coalesce to produce a movie that is a
work of mad genius and genuine madness; a bold and remarkable bounty of
confusing creativity and unchecked indulgence; a film going out of its way not
to be understood, but rather to be perplexing at every opportunity. An
uncompromisingly convoluted, curiously terrifying, pseudo-pornographic,
repellent, and beautiful thing of abject weirdness that must be seen! This is a
movie where Judi Dench lies in a cat bed and James Corden laps up champagne with
his tongue; where cats tap dance in Mickey Mouse pants and one can pull off her
skin to reveal a showgirl outfit underneath. Never have I seen a film more
ill-suited to its medium so confidently yet futilely attempting to prove
otherwise. If Cats doesn’t succeed
the way it deserves to at the box office, it is a certain cult hit in the
making, of a kind perhaps not seen since The
Rocky Horror Picture Show itself.
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/jbosch/
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/jbosch/
Comments
Post a Comment