Live-action sitcoms about kids tend to not be very good. I grew up in arguably the golden age of this genre on the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon (and their awkward Canadian cousin, The Family Channel), and I certainly enjoyed my fair share of them -Drake & Josh, Ned’s Declassified School Survival Guide, and even That’s So Raven being particular favourites. But their appeal was in their pre-teen to teenage representation and the sense of fun they extolled while still being somewhat relatable to the ordinary kid’s life and patterns. They were never of high mark when it came to the writing, directing, humour, and acting, and you would have to be very generous to argue that point as an adult bereft of nostalgia or cherry-picked examples to the contrary. I feel like I was somewhat aware of this at the time, but didn’t care. Kids need to see these kind of stories from their perspective on-screen. That alone matters.
These shows were sequestered away on TV networks designed for a younger audience -there was very little media in the mainstream during that time to centre on kids as point-of-view subjects. With one notable exception.
 |
I was aware of the show Malcolm in the Middle, but in my disinterest in general network TV back then I only ever caught fleeting glimpses of it. And yet even then I could tell it was a more intelligent, more edgy show than any others I’d seen starring child actors. It actively -literally- spoke to its audience in a snarky tone, embodied a little more cynicism in its stories and lessons for kids, and while it featured heavily the parents, they were not the leads but rather equal subjects -which was kind of cool. The characters had ‘attitude’ that felt genuine, their world was not some idealized kid-fantasy sound-stage -it had some real resonating grunginess to it, which was also reflected in the show’s opening theme, both a song and a perfectly-cut sequence that felt downright punk to a thirteen year-old, espousing aggressive lyrics like “you’re not the boss of me now” and “life is unfair”. This for a show that at its start revolved around an eleven year-old.
This reputation permeated, even as I didn’t watch the show intentionally during its run. It was known for these elements, known as the show that launched Frankie Muniz, who seemed to be as big a child star as Hillary Duff for a while there. The show with the insanely angry mom played by Jane Kaczmarek next to a silly and timid dad played by Bryan Cranston -who I did understand his sense of comedy in this part enough to be as surprised as everyone else when he started winning Emmys for a dark and severe drama called Breaking Bad. And I recognized at least visually the other cast members as well, who just looked like a real quartet of brothers irrespective of the show. It had had a good life-span -seven seasons- and as the years went by felt like one of those pinnacle time capsule shows of its era, the 2000s: a period with relatively few of those it seems. Hell, Marvel seemed to recognize it when -in the sitcom history pastiche that was the primary selling point and one fun aspect of WandaVision- they chose it as their principal aesthetic model for the 2000s.
 |
Yet it is curious that while Malcolm in the Middle is undeniably remembered, it is not necessarily remembered as a great or important show even as it was, especially in its early seasons, quite critically acclaimed and popular with audiences. As far as American sitcoms go, it was technically revolutionary in popularizing a much more versatile look and feel by doing away with the traditional three camera set-up and studio audience of most comedies at that time. The camera on Malcolm in the Middle moved around the house, it went outside, and it could make stylistic adjustments where necessary for a joke or atmospheric touch. The series shot on film as opposed to video, and did a lot of work on location -showcasing real spaces rarely seen in other sitcoms, and employed a very distinct fast-cut editing style that had a very modern sensibility to it, accentuating the humour and giving the show overall a quicker rhythm. Structurally, it melded storylines like no other show, aided by its pacing, and most distinctly featured an element of fourth-wall breaking in every episode -Malcolm often turning directly to camera to comment in short soliloquy on a situation or feeling, speaking to the audience his thoughts in a way that both felt organic and made him relatable as a protagonist -especially for kids, whose annoyances and anxieties he vocalized well.
No other show at the time looked or felt like Malcolm in the Middle, but I think a reason its innovative quality has been underwritten is that it just felt so natural given the show’s themes and subject matter, which in a more traditional format wouldn’t at all fit. Certainly some would argue it did for a show like Roseanne -but the conventional sitcom format did still come with artificiality baked in. Malcolm in the Middle though had substantially fewer barriers in relating its important image of working-class American family life. At the end of the day that was a key element of the show’s premise, and probably why it resonated for more than simply the style on its own.
 |
This was a show premised on the idea of an extraordinary intellect amidst an incredibly ordinary family. The reason why Malcolm’s I.Q. and ‘gifted’ status means so much is because he comes from humble roots -struggling at times- and this doesn’t change because he is designated as special. In fact it is the last thing that he wants for himself -even as a young child at the start of the series his intellect is a burden that he would some of the time rather do without. Perhaps a side effect of his upbringing, he rejects the social mores and expectations put upon him, he would much rather be a regular kid. And it is why, for as frustrating, fearful, and aggravating as his home life may be, it is still a place where he has some comfort -at least some sense of normalcy and consistency in his family relationships.
Malcolm's family is a peculiar one, at least as far as TV sitcoms go. Creator Linwood Boomer based it in part on his own family growing up, and the weird and wild episodes he experienced as a kid in essentially a version of the same circumstance as Malcolm. As such it is a contrast to other dysfunctional sitcom families and has a palpable sense of realism to it. In the dynamic between the brothers, the everyday realities of home-life, and the little believable touches of chaos that underscore the more dramatic exaggerated ones. This is a family with a domineering matriarch, Lois -taking up the space often reserved for the father in these sitcoms- who rules the home with an iron fist, inspiring fear and rebellion from her children in equal measure. Her husband Hal is the more passive, sensitive parent, well-intentioned but hopelessly dimwitted at times. And the kids are the perfect foils for both, handily manipulating their father while facing severe scrutiny and consequences from their mother. They are prototypical adolescent boys though, even Malcolm -innately recognizable in behaviour to anyone who grew up with brothers or knew them. One of the more underrated bits of brilliance to the show were the cold opens -much shorter than is typical of comedies- that were often mere gags on the stupid, irresponsible, mean idiosyncrasies of a house full of boys. Digging through the couch for coins and finding progressively stranger things, getting into petty arguments while breaking things playing baseball in the house, having a contest over who can stomach the most expired food from the fridge, or two older brothers callously breaking a promise to their younger brother to let him play catch even after he saves their ball.
 |
The show never lost sight of its roots. For its duration, Lois worked a menial job at a drugstore while Hal was some vague office salesman drone. Hand-me-downs and leftovers were occasionally discussed, the expense of new amenities, and of course through to Malcolm’s graduation at the end of the series, he, Reese, and Dewey all shared a single room (and he and Dewey a single bed). Only oldest brother Francis experienced any momentum through the show -left to his own isolated storylines for much of the time- and these were lateral if anything. Going from military school in the first two seasons to a logging job in Alaska and then winding up at a dude ranch before aimlessly drifting across just a handful of appearances in the last two seasons. The economic station of the family is what informs much of Lois’s attitude towards her sons. On several occasions she emphasizes how tough the world is, as she has observed from experience, and how her intent is to prepare them for a difficult life. In the finale she makes that point explicitly clear to Malcolm -that given his intelligence and high prospects it is especially vital that he is aware of the struggle. Her plan for him is that his career will eventually lead to the presidency, and that he needs to know what it’s like for the poor working class in order to honestly and empathetically enact change.
And Malcolm is certainly kept humble through the show, whether you agree with his mother’s tactics or not. It is a small but important detail that he is never made a cartoon character by his brilliance (a la Young Sheldon), nor does he conform to any precocious caricatures. On the rare occasion that he does fully show off his genius -such as the early episode at his school picnic where he answers a series of complex mathematical equations, it is something that is outside his usual character, that embarrasses him, and that is subverted by his family’s reaction. Even among his more conventionally nerdy collection of friends, he stands out for his natural grounded attitude. As the seasons go along, he doesn’t necessarily want something big and important in his future -he is open to the opportunities he has that the rest of his family don’t, but certainly doesn’t have the high expectations for himself that Lois does. His roots are a core of his identity, and though the show ends on him ostensibly following through on the path the family charted for him, it’s not necessarily that he has no agency in that. I interpret his ending as his realization of the responsibility a working class background impresses on him with the talents he has. A very curious message and context for a silly family sitcom.
 |
Another thing that the show did really right was show an honest sympathy with the suckier sides of childhood. The series opens on Malcolm’s first address to camera: “you know what the best part about being a kid is -eventually, it stops”. No other show centred on kids would dare to make such a statement, given the fun of being a kid is worked into the very DNA of a lot of them. And childhood certainly is fun of course. But Malcolm in the Middle cast no aspersions on the annoying, awkward, and just bad aspects of it, which Malcolm of course with his I.Q. (and the voice of the writers) can express a certain awareness of that other youths in the show cannot. The lack of power especially comes across, with Malcolm and Reese often trying to find it in their home-life in their own ways coming into conflict with their mother, standing their ground in a manner very common in families but so little seen in other shows concerned with leaving a good impression. Kids are at the mercy of so many systems, endeavouring to buck them at home almost seems logical. For Malcolm of course, it starts at the beginning when he is put into the advanced education “Krelboyne” class against his will. Dewey is later put into a special class of his own. Francis is under the most regimented form at military school, where the control is more authoritative and he is likewise compelled to be more rebellious. But even after he drops out, he finds himself under the thumb of eccentric bosses, whether in Alaska or on the ranch, as he sets out on his own path in life that seems to confirm the unending cycle his parents are in. A similar trajectory can be found in Reese, who though he is naive to most of these, winds up enlisting in the army late in the series. Both he and Francis express a comic durability to some of their hardships in these capacities as a result of their upbringing under Lois, but it slyly confirms a little of the effectiveness of her parenting style -outrageous though it often is.
 |
The show doesn’t ever touch specifically on themes like puberty, but uncomfortable aspects of growing up linked to this are certainly explored -most notably crushes and romantic inclinations for Malcolm and Reese (Dewey curiously rarely got those storylines). And again, these never worked out. Even on other shows about kids that dealt with themes of unrequited juvenile affections, they might employ a sense of grace and tenderness. Not so on this show where just about every failed romance is catastrophic. A clingy, desperate Malcolm begging his brief girlfriend to take him back after being far too possessive of her. On another occasion really fumbling a potential great relationship over his neurotic focus on her not meeting his typical standards of attraction. His first (and probably cutest) unexpected infatuation wherein he makes every cringy mistake in the book (not helped by parental interference. And of course there was the perplexing dynamic he had with a neighbouring girl played by Hayden Panettiere, who appeared at times to be genuinely into Malcolm, but had a lot more fun toying with the brothers and at one point manipulating Malcolm into crushing on her and breaking up with his girlfriend at the time. Not all of these were relatable, but the feelings were. It doesn’t even touch on the countless rejections both boys experienced, sometimes to very humiliating degrees. Humiliation is a part of being a kid and this show never skimped on that, nor did it give catharsis to every instance of it. One of my favourite examples being Malcolm’s explosion to his mother at a bowling alley (where she is already embarrassing him in front of classmates at every turn), and after getting gutter balls on every try walks on the lane right up to the pins, throws the ball, and still manages to not hit any. His reaction is as identifiable as it is priceless. Something else to be emphasized and that again is a boon to this show in comparison to others at that time to centre kids, but the performances are very good from the young actors. Frankie Muniz and Justin Berfield especially are solid early on, and only get better as the series progresses and they find much more comfort in the rhythms of their characters’ comedy. And Erik Per Sullivan eventually gets there too, mastering Dewey’s non sequitur personality.
 |
Dewey may well be a manifestation of the show’s aesthetic itself, which apart from its basic set-up was also somewhat experimental from time to time for the sake of segment or gag. Visually it occasionally went surreal through a couple minimalist dream sequences or in one great moment to illustrate a vivid change in attitude from Hal. There were comic overhead shots like in the pilot visualizing a social force field around Malcolm, uses of wide angles and fisheye lenses, stuff that just made a point of how different the show was in scale; and great editing tricks as well. The acclaimed bowling episode is a watershed of these, were two competing timelines often intersect in what appears to be the same shot. Then of course there were the transitions, often swift wipes to a new scene or a later point, that do have a real comic efficacy and make the show’s pacing feel more tight (and indeed I think the show is just a tiny bit shorter than average sitcoms -though that might just be due to the absence of a usual end tag). All of it of course springs out of the meta nature to the series -Malcolm’s constant asides to the audience their own little oasis where anything goes- and it just became second-nature after a while that the innovative spin of it fell away. Because so many series replicated its stylings to their own strong effect. And on top of the filmmaking and post-production stuff there was also just the willingness to go the extra mile for a gag -in a way that other shows might be constrained by things like the studio audience. A lot of them involved Cranston doing wild stunts like roller skate-dancing, speed-running in a ludicrous one-piece, being strapped to the front of a moving vehicle, and most famously being completely covered in bees. But the boys did their fair share as well, probably most notably in the perhaps now iconic scene of the four brothers riding a golf cart into a swimming pool, with nonchalant expressions as they sink underwater.
 |
There’s a curious metaphor to be gleaned in that of the family going down but going down as a family. It is another thing that is stressed on the show on a not irregular basis -that for as dysfunctional and toxic as they may be they still love each other deep down and will stand by each other. The younger brothers have a fierce sense of loyalty to Francis, who is their cool older brother, and Hal is supremely devoted to Lois. It’s actually interesting that he never undergoes the storyline so many sitcom fathers get at some point of tempted infidelity -there is no other woman for Hal than Lois and it is a foregone conclusion. Their relationship is actually one of the sweetest things on the show, and where Lois can really express some endearing humanity. Few sitcom couples have the passion and the patience that they do -even their arguments never feel dire in terms of what they might spell for the marriage. While their romantic moments can range from cute to spicy to genuinely beautiful. Perhaps the show’s best sequence is in the second season finale during a downpour while Lois is worried she might be pregnant again -and at the closest brink their marriage comes to collapsing under the stress, they tell each other what they love about the other and it is as lovely and earnest as can be. They are like a chemically perfect yin and yang.
 |
As far as family warmth goes, what was more rare though just as nice were when the family came through for each other and defended each other in unexpected moments. There are a handful of these instances between Malcolm and Reese -who really is a sad character we come to get a picture of. But more surprising is when the boys come through for their mom, such as when they take her side against Francis after he ditches military school and when they and Hal come to her defence and beat up a bunch of clowns for her. Because Lois did occasionally show this care towards them -especially Malcolm who, while still enforcing her household authoritarianism she treated more as an adult the older he got, as he was working with her at her job and even consulting her for love life advice. She could be awful at times in her attitude and punishments -but at other times she didn’t get her due credit for coming through for the family. She took her role as a mother seriously, one of the more complex versions of this archetype in television. And yet, again, one that is thoroughly recognizable.
That relatability in spite of bouts of outrageousness really was a big thing that set Malcolm in the Middle apart and continues to do so. It’s never really been replicated again for the family sitcom format, or if it has it hasn’t been so successful. The show did somewhat slip under the radar during its own time -it won a few Emmys for writing and directing, Cloris Leachman won a couple times as well for her recurring performance as Lois’s horribly mean mother, but Kaczmarek herself never won in spite of receiving nominations every year the show was on the air. Nor did Cranston or Muniz, who were nominated during the run as well. And its popularity did decline as it went along, with the show performing particularly poorly by its last few seasons -which are to be fair, noticeably weaker than the show had been previously. The length of its run did ultimately fit however, with an organic jumping off point being Malcolm’s high school graduation in the series finale -Reese’s as well, having been held back a year. And the episode’s central moment is one bent on re-crystallizing the show’s representation and its importance -stern, but leaving room for a sense of meaningful purpose for Malcolm always at this crossroads between his intelligence and his upbringing. There is something very valuable in that.
 |
And what is unfair or problematic about it has now been reconciled by the twenty-years-later reboot miniseries, Malcolm in the Middle: Life's Still Unfair, a better-than-average specimen as far as these sort of things go in terms of feeling very cohesive with the series that preceded it. Lois's expectations are given some leeway and the pressure it kept a non-President Malcolm under is responsibly addressed. The underlying meaning though still matters, arguably more in 2026 than it did in 2006. The premise of the revival fits into it as well. Malcolm has largely cut himself off from his family, believing that their presence brings out the worst in him and would have negative consequences on the stability of his own life and family. But ignoring them doesn’t make them go away and only creates problems in his life when his loved ones do find out. Ultimately he does have to acknowledge and live with his family. We all do. Families like Malcolm’s are everywhere -it’s part of the reason they have no last name tying them to any particular cultural demographic (other than white).
Malcolm in the Middle had great fun shining a spotlight on those families, and doing so in a manner in terms of its style and humour that really made a mark. It is a very goofy show, and very good at playing with that goofiness in smart, cinematic ways (you’ll never forget the hilariously dead expression on Malcolm’s face that time he leaps into a bouncy castle he is too old for). But at its heart it was a show subtly dedicated to showcasing the struggles of working class white families on the margins -ordinary families that, if less extreme in the shenanigans they got up to, are represented more accurately and fairly than just about any family sitcom to precede it. Certainly it was what stuck out the most to me on watching it through for the first time over the course of the past few years. That, and just how much more sophisticated this made it compared to other sitcoms of its time yes, but specifically those with child protagonists during an era replete in those kinds of shows. Really, it offered something for everybody, and still kind of does. A handful of moments and jokes aside, it holds up fairly well -both in its humour and messaging, whether that be in the class consciousness, coming-of-age, or unique family values departments. And it is indeed a great time capsule for the early 2000s -its fashions and music (a bunch of really good needle-drops colour the series) some very fun throwbacks to enjoy. The kid-centred show I should have watched as a kid, but that speaks with an observantly cynical snark and intelligence to me as an adult. Kind of like Malcolm himself would.
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/jordanbosch.bsky.social
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/jbosch
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Comments
Post a Comment