Skip to main content

Together: A Movie That Really Sticks with to You

There’s a way of viewing this movie as some demented form of couples’ therapy for Alison Brie and Dave Franco. And it’s probably not entirely without merit.
The metaphor of two becoming one in the context of love or marriage is an age-old theme that, while having some social or religious connotation to it, has frequently been evoked with high romance. A profound ideal of compatibility and belonging, faith and companionship. That notion that the right other person will perfectly fit the gap in oneself and they will each be made whole as a result. I get the impression that director Michael Shanks, an Australian YouTuber here making his movie debut, had heard variations of this theme a lot -perhaps he’d been to several weddings- and made the natural leap that someone inclined towards genre filmmaking would, and asked ‘yeah, but what if that were real?’
Together isn’t an original idea. And I don’t mean necessarily to suggest it is a plagiarized script outright as it has been accused (however unlike in a lot of these cases, this one appears to hold water on several counts, including specific details of plot and theme). But it is a concept simple enough that it is not inconceivable multiple people could have dreamt it up independently. Romantic partners literally fusing together as apparent ultimate embodiment of love, but showcasing that for horror  -it’s an easy, digestible story as concept. In execution, it is anything but.
Following a couple through a rough patch in their relationship after Tim (Franco) hesitates to respond to a marriage proposal by Millie (Brie) just ahead of their move to the country for her teaching job, the movie foremost succeeds at presenting a perfect mess of a relationship. Tim gives off mixed signals between his apparent commitment issues and his fierce dependency on Millie, which she is unsure what to make of. And then on a hiking trip, they fall down a hole and while stranded drink from the water of an ominous-looking pool. And then the strange stuff starts happening. First their legs and then gradually other body parts become bizarrely temporarily attached, at the same time Tim finds himself inexplicably, instinctively drawn to Millie, unable to be away from her for any length of time.
Eventually of course this becomes quite graphic, in ways you might suspect and in ways you wouldn’t. And the movie earns some points in not leaving these effects entirely to the CG department. Perhaps the best is a prosthetic arm cast worn by Franco and Brie at one point when their arms have been fused together and they are forced to resort to a drastic measure to separate. There is also a rather vivid prop used in the most obvious scene of body parts attaching given the subject matter and the freaky homunculus stuff in the climax. The manner of these owe a lot to classic effects from movies like The Thing and An American Werewolf in London (a figure even appears that bears a conscious resemblance to the remains recovered at the beginning of The Thing). And such tangible components work well in tandem with the less convincing though interesting digital effects, whereby hands roam under each other’s skin as though it were a piece of clothing -bodies moving about within bodies.
There is no abundance of these sequences, Shanks is rather sparing as he builds the tension and focuses on the gestating physical and mental health effects for Tim in particular -who is prescribed merely treatment for panic attacks. And while there is altogether too much dismissing of the severity of what is afflicting Tim and Millie -both by them and others, the movie is right to hone in on this more relatable anxiety. Tim’s co-dependence on Millie is illustrated strongly, a guy without the same kind of stability (he is a struggling musician while she is a teacher) relying on her substantially for both economic and moral support, yet who is unable to return affection when she needs it, in some ways ignorant to her life outside of him. His vague understanding of his shortcomings here only fuels his desperation and debilitating fear that she will leave him. It is also interesting how she manifests as a demon of his nightmares -suggestive of what she really epitomizes to him subconsciously. Meanwhile Millie is at a crossroads in processing their relationship, comfortable but with a newfound wariness this situation only exacerbates. And through the movie her vulnerability is manipulated, both subtly (perhaps unconsciously) by Tim and more overtly by her colleague Jamie, played by a deftly creepy Damon Herriman -invested in the couple sticking together, literally. Moved through this situation by the influence and actions of others she is the greater bearer of tragedy -a potent illustration of what often befalls women in such toxic relationships.
Brie and Franco's evidently is not that, much as the making of this movie had to prompt some healthy psychological examination of it. They have an appropriately natural chemistry that perhaps brings out their best. I've not seen Franco so committed in a role, nor Brie so overwhelmed.  And it is clear the process of this movie was arduous on both of them. They are each actors best identified with comedy roles and though their performances here aren't extraordinary, they are proof of a little more range possessed than they've been typically allowed to show.
The direction this concept ultimately takes is an obvious one, though its framing is curiously ambiguous, in spite of the seemingly damning statement it appears to make on the relationship issue. It leaves open a consideration for the romantic, and Shanks on some level seems to buy into it, but the movie doesn't quite earn that sentiment; and it comes with some problematic baggage in terms of what it communicates about co-dependency if read in this context. That the whole fusion process, for its horror, could be a beautiful and liberating thing, is not something you are easily convinced of. And yet the last beat of the movie blurs things further, opening up an existential quandary Shanks bows out of having to confront. It is a tenuous resolution, though beyond some grotesque spectacle, not I think a satisfactorily thematically coherent one.
It is possible the makers of Together do not deserve the full credit on the story's content and concept and that will be a difficult thing to square however the lawsuit turns out. On its execution though, Shanks delivers his weird and freakish visuals while not depending on them or less convincing avenues of illustration. Focus is adequately maintained on the real basis for the conflict, and the actors do a good job bringing it to life. A vivid horror movie, and a fascinating one.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...

Blackadder: A Reassessment of My Favourite(?) TV Show

The Foretelling: “Blackadder, Blackadder! With many a cunning plan. Blackadder, Blackadder! You horrid little man!” (Series One, End Credits Song) Though it’s still fairly little-known outside the U.K. and Europe, for the last forty years Blackadder   has held a space as one of the great landmark comedies in British television history -consistently ranking high in assessments of the best British shows. It played a pivotal role in launching the careers of several prominent British icons -most notably Rowan Atkinson, but also Richard Curtis -the series’ creator, Stephen Fry, and Hugh Laurie. Across it’s canonical four series between 1983 and 1989 and three one-off specials between 1988 and 1999, it had a significant influence in the world of British comedy, and specifically became one of the defining works in the sadly largely untapped subgenre of historical comedy. It has also had a great influence on me personally, who at fifteen came across a rerun of it on a Canadian BB...