Skip to main content

The Earnest Process of Healing and Grief for His Three Daughters

There’s a trauma in the anticipation of losing a loved one that is different than the loss itself. It is a grieving process that begins before there is a death to grieve defined by complicated feelings and anxiety over the inevitable. The period before a major but expected death is full of the kinds of preparations and grim realities that you would never want to face, but with the morbid fact of the loved one still being present and tangible. Yet most would agree it is better to know the loss is coming, because with all this stress also comes opportunity for reflection, catharsis, and closure. Even healing.
Vincent’s three daughters are especially in need of that, as they converge on New York City to care for their father in the final days of his battle with cancer. Each of them approaches the situation with what maturity they can muster while also aware of the need to repair their estranged relationship with each other in order to get through the imminent loss of their beloved dad. Writer-director Azazel Jacobs brings a compassionate eye to the mundane yet universal human drama of dealing with an impending death. His Three Daughters is the story of sisters struggling to find their bond through loss.
A few years ago, Elizabeth Olsen in an interview expressed frustration and regret that the obligations of her Marvel Studios contract forced her to turn down Yorgos Lanthimos’s The Lobster and other projects that would have been more artistically fulfilling. Well, His Three Daughters is a movie designed to be a great showcase for its trio of actresses, each of whom have been muted in one way or another by their Hollywood roles -for her part, Carrie Coon lately criticized all the reporting on Gena Rowlands’ death citing her as merely “star of The Notebook”. Coon plays Kate, eldest sister and single mother of a teenager, who lives in neighbouring Brooklyn but hasn’t visited her nearby family much in recent years. Olsen is Christina, the younger daughter who lives comfortably in LA with her husband and young daughter –and seems notably the most put-together. And then there’s Natasha Lyonne as Rachel, the underachieving middle step-daughter who nonetheless was raised as one of Vincent’s own and lives in his rent-controlled apartment where she has tended to him long before either of her sisters got involved with his care; and who is not so subtly resented by them –Kate especially.
The dynamics are played with a wonderfully authentic rhythm by each of the three actresses, even and perhaps especially the slightly more artificial beats of undue meanness or presumption like Kate’s resistance to comprehending just how much Rachel cares for their father (and suspects she merely wants to inherit the desirable apartment) or Rachel viewing Christina’s efforts to reach out and bridge the sisters’ gap with cynicism. All are in harmony in enacting a simultaneous history and strain -the subtleties of communication and body language in scenes between Coon and Olsen indicative of a kinder more diplomatic relationship, compared to Lyonne always carrying herself with self-conscious tenseness. She is the most interesting of the three, politely adjusting her routine and trying to be hospitable to her guests, while silently bitter over the intrusion and the judgement they bring on her. She knew their dad the closest in recent years, and it is she who can’t bear to be in the room with him, instead sitting outside anxiously listening to the steady beeps of the ECG machine -tangible faintly in the background for most of the movie. Where her sisters appear ready to face him and confront his death, it’s as though Rachel hopes to deter its reality. And yet Lyonne is careful not to show her emotional vulnerability on the surface -tapping into that instinct to save face around sisters who already expect her not to have it together.
But it is clear that all three have baggage, both with each other and in some way with their father that they need to find closure with. And for much of the movie, Jacobs and his actresses illustrate it in grounded, subtle ways. The clear regret in Kate over her late emotional distance that comes out in anger and prejudice, especially towards Rachel, who got to spend that time with their dad that she didn't. The anxiety in Christina over keeping together a family she too feels she has neglected. Jacobs comes at these feelings with real tenderness and engages with as much interest in the mundaneness of their situation, both soothing and stressful. The hospice worker Angel (Rudy Galvan) constantly has to deliver uncertain status updates, and with that the sisters set about prepping his funeral and obituary, and thinking about what to do with his possessions. You can feel the knot in their stomachs as they do this as Jacobs taps into the dim anxiety as many of us have experienced.
His Three Daughters however, is not a bleak movie -much as it concerns itself with inevitable death. This anxiety and apprehension is rendered with an honest frankness, but the manner in which it is powered through is almost comforting. And of course the way that the sisters are forced to come together emotionally in spite of their differences over their shared grief is a sliver of hopefulness too. When push comes to shove, a loved one's death can be a unifying thing.
In spite of the dressed-down authenticity, the moment of the movie comes with the climax, and an appearance by Vincent (Jay O. Sanders) that dispenses with all realism for a transcendent scene in the vein of Dryer (Ordet specifically) that speaks most powerfully to the bond between father and daughters, the very root of the emotional turmoil that so motivates all three. Perhaps what we see is the fantasy of all children mourning their parents, save for the notion of not having to mourn at all. Sanders is breathtaking, the scene's conclusion silently devastating, and it leads into a tenderly moving resolution for the women when at last given licence to lean on each other alone.
What you are left with is a searing and intimate, earnestly tangible examination of family dysfunction in the vicinity of grief. A small movie, but in the hands of Jacobs, Coon, Olsen, Lyonne, and Sanders feels enormous. Its periphery is limited in the manner of a one-act play, but film is its rightful medium; as still as Jacobs's techniques may be, they feed the understated nuances and calculated pace that could not be effective in another form. And movies have a particular power of impression that His Three Daughters is an apt conduit for. A movie about preparing for a loss through reconciliation, so as to make that loss easier to bear. I can certainly see this movie's audience taking that to heart for when the time comes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...