Skip to main content

Frenetic and Disorienting, Dev Patel’s Action Debut Makes a Stand

Monkey Man is Dev Patel’s passion project, though it’s Jordan Peele who is to thank for the form of its release. It was he who saved the movie from Netflix, who had acquired it as mere platform real estate before nearly having it shelved due to concerns about how its contentious political themes would play for Indian audiences. Peele saw a cut of the movie, came on as a producer, and persuaded Universal to acquire it for a wide theatrical release. Suddenly this little movie that might have amounted to nothing is an action blockbuster with the same breadth as John Wick. An excellent and admirable use of one’s power in Hollywood.
And apart from its specific energized action, there is an urgency to Monkey Man that warrants the scope of its theatrical release -for countries around the world but especially for India itself (where unfortunately it may be the least likely to be seen). Even as it is strictly an outsider film, produced and funded largely through American and British bodies, that very fact has allowed it to in a way speak more aptly to its subjects of right-wing religious nationalism in India and a kind of class corruption perhaps swept under the rug by India’s often strict film censorship apparatus. Bold that it does so too in the trappings of the action revenge film -a genre itself quite popular over there.
Patel stars in the movie, as well as directing and co-writing it, not skipping the chance to -if only for a moment- be an action hero himself. His character is nameless (though he goes by “Bobby” for a portion of the runtime) -referred to as ‘Kid’ in the credits. Kid, who grew up in a forest village enraptured by stories from Hindu mythology -and particularly that of Hanuman the monkey god- comes to the city of Yatana in the years after his home was pillaged and his mother murdered  by local authorities, to find those responsible among the city’s political and religious elite and take revenge. While supporting himself as a masked street wrestler under the alias ‘Monkey Man’ he infiltrates a high-end business in order to get closer to his main targets -a manipulative celebrity guru and a corrupt police chief.
A lot of his backstory and relationship to these figures is clarified as the movie unfolds, Patel more interested in immersing his audience upfront in this world that very starkly contrasts the serenity of his pastoral childhood flashbacks with the grungy impoverished world of his present circumstances as low-caste in the city, with the gross vice and opulence in the circles of its rich overlords. Even the perceptibly humble spiritualist Baba Shakti (Makarand Deshpande) lives in the luxury of his power and influence -one ritual in a pristine temple is witnessed and cheered on by hundreds. And that kind of hypocrisy seems to be what most grates on Patel, who is keen also to tie such figures to specific political and social identities. The film takes place in an election year, Shakti endorsing a Hindu nationalist party (with a leader who bears a resemblance to Narendra Modi), while government attacks against the transgender community are happening in the background. Patel has said the movie is about the plight of the underdog and it’s good to see he recognizes where the most vulnerable underdogs are. And he spells this out by drawing direct connections to real modern incidents of social unrest and crisis in India that flash rapid-fire before his mind during a moment of vocational lucidity.
Patel likes this kind of fast-paced editing, particularly in fight or chase sequences in order to evoke a sense of free-wheeling chaos (and in some places by his own admission to disguise the limitations of a very uneasy production). But while the mood it conveys is appropriate, the execution often leaves the scenes wanting for visual clarity. This is a violent movie, and yet in several fights the injuries don’t resonate so strongly because the cutting doesn’t allow for the impact to be felt. A car chase and a foot chase about midway through aren’t as exciting as they could be because the geography is obscured by this need for propulsive pacing. It makes the stakes for Kid harder to quantify. What’s most unfortunate about this choice is that Patel clearly has a passion for action filmmaking and stunt-work that isn’t given just expression here. Fortunately, he eases up by the climactic sequences once Kid has fully come into his own and Patel’s hard work is on better display.
And he does prove some real filmmaking aptitude elsewhere -he can rest on a striking image or two, draw meaningful symbolism connecting Kid’s story, and the narrative of the film more broadly, to that of Hanuman; setting a context of injustice along the way. He’s unapologetic in the disrepute and brutality of the world that he is tearing down as well -not only are the kinds of people he’s after those who would frequent an upscale brothel that serves vials of cocaine, but they are exceptionally violent and vindictive, especially the chief Rana Singh (Sikander Kher), with whom Kid has his most brutal confrontations. The way that he marries that violence to gaudy refinement is quite catching, as is his illustration of the depreciation that trickles down to the corners of civilization he exists in. He's both cognizant of the methods of visual symbolism and inventive as to how to craft action beats around them.
His movie does come short in some respects of its commentary, it must be said. The Islamophobia of much of the Hindu nationalist movement is referenced but not interrogated. Patel is aware that he is walking on eggshells with very controversial issues in India, so is careful not to use a lot of direct Hindu iconography in association with his villains -choosing to portray them in much the same way western media would pious and corrupt priests. And of course for his hero he is drawing from the same mythological well. The caste issue is also a touch underdeveloped beyond sporadic imagery and a couple lines referring to social inequities. On this front it hasn't the bite of Patel's breakout, Slumdog Millionaire.
But where it may lack in direct insight it makes up for in characterization. Both Deshpande and Kher make for compelling antagonists, the former especially; while Kid's allies include Pitobash Tripathy as the wickedly streetsmart Alphonso and Vipin Sharma as Alpha, the wise leader of the transgender enclave Kid takes refuge in. Sobhita Dhulipala as a mistreated escort and Sharlto Copley as the wrestler M.C. round out the cast with nuanced and gonzo performances respectively.
Monkey Man is a semi-successful melding of Indian culture and political contexts with modern action aesthetics, both western and eastern. The hodge-podge isn't clean by any means, and some of Patel's choices leave something to be desired, but it is interesting, and very compelling on its base thematic level. Patel's passion in both the subject and his convictions rings strongly, indicating the formation of a great director. It's important that Peele came in and saved the movie, one of those few action flicks -in spite of some reservations- with something meaningful to say.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day