Skip to main content

So You Think You’re Mean Girls?


The thing about 2004’s Mean Girls is that it is basically a feature-length Saturday Night Live sketch. A really really good SNL sketch don’t get me wrong -written by one of the show’s then best writers Tina Fey. In fact if my generation had a Ghostbusters, a beloved, irreverent, endlessly quotable comedy, it would be Mean Girls. But Mean Girls IS a comedy, one that plays upon heightened high school archetypes in funny, creative ways. Its themes around high school cliques and social acceptance were not particularly innovative or interesting even then -it was simply a good teen comedy.
And then it became a high budget, moderately self-serious musical, and there the point seemed to have gotten lost. It became an intellectual property, and much like Ghostbusters of late, a far too sincere one. I haven’t seen the Mean Girls musical on stage obviously, but now we have a movie adaptation to spotlight all of its flaws in its stead.
Just like the original movie of course, it follows Cady Heron, played by Angourie Rice, going to public high school in the U.S. for the first time after years being home-schooled while her parents lived in Kenya. There she is embraced by a small clique of popular girls called ‘the Plastics’, led by the school’s appointed Queen Bee Regina George (Reneé Rapp) -with whom she eventually comes into conflict over both a boy and her general mean-spirited personality.
Directed by Samantha Jayne and Arturo Perez Jr., from a script once again by Fey -who reprises her role as math teacher Mrs. Norbury, alongside Tim Meadows as Principal Duvall- the movie is from the start less explicitly honed in on Cady (a framing device is provided by Auli’i Cravalho’s Janis and Jaquel Spivey’s Damian -Cady’s initial friends at North Shore High) and it is more noticeably sanitized than the original film. It’s not a surprising or indeed problem choice for an update of a movie that came out in 2004, made liberal use of a popular slur at the time, featured a background running joke about a teacher’s inappropriate relations with students, and expressed some general attitudes that weren’t particularly considered. Yet their absence and replacement with tamer and safer qualities to the script and characters only emphasizes how much Mean Girls explicitly belongs to the time period it came out in.
In terms of plot, it made sense then that a girl like Janis would be ostracised and labelled a lesbian simply for not conforming to traditional femininity. In a modern sense that aspect of her character, and of Janis and Regina’s shared history has to be amended -made much more convoluted. Because even the villains of this movie aren’t allowed to be homophobic or ableist, regardless of whether or not it may be representative of how real mean teenagers are (indeed, I think this is why the original movie still stands up in spite of its poorly aged material). And while a part of this is certainly acquiescing, albeit cynically, to evolving times and sensibilities, another part is surely wrapped up in how popular outside of Mean Girls the Regina George character has become in the decades since. She is a meme as much if not more than a villain.
Playing that meme is Rapp in a decent enough imitation of Rachel McAdams -and certainly she's got the voice to carry the song sequences. Less capable in that department is Rice, though she otherwise plays Cady fairly well -if not allowed the same devices of self-awareness that coloured Lindsay Lohan's original take on the character. Indeed, interior commentary all through the film has quite naturally been replaced by songs and distributed more evenly among the cast. Even the secondary plastics, Gretchen (Bebe Wood) and Karen (Avantika), get their own numbers. Avantika is quite good actually, believably playing a ditziness that is related to yet substantively distinct enough from her predecessor Amanda Seyfried. Though Cravalho is the only real stand-out of the cast, especially as she gets the movie's only particularly good musical number "I'd Rather Be Me" -even as it completely sidelines an important narrative beat between Cady and Regina.
The movie has this tendency to miss the forest for the trees, honing in on the bits that people remember from the original movie without cultivating much the structure around them. So there are a lot of comedic bits for instance that are now either set against a more earnest tone that doesn't suit them or recontextualized in a way that they lose their effect: "Get in loser, we're going shopping" is played with an air of cool rather than irony. "Stop trying to make fetch happen" is emphasized for its emotional sting to Gretchen rather than simply a sharply delivered funny line. These and all the jokes that felt spontaneous originally now wreak of being manufactured, as the script and performers lean into them winkingly -most starkly exemplified by the "she doesn't even go here" line, delivered so poorly they try it again later and fumble it even harder. The makers of this film (and probably the musical more generally) don't appreciate how so many of these moments became famous off a specific context of delivery and ingenuity that simply cannot be recreated -even by Fey herself.
What doesn't help this deficit of voice is how little vision or tenacity is present in the filmmaking itself. Jayne and Perez are not particularly interested in crafting the movie to be distinct, even within a context allowing for expressive and flashy musical sequences. The tracking shots feel almost mechanical, and unlike something like The Color Purple there’s no feel of a stage; rather some sequences are blatantly aided by digital effects that robs them of immediacy. And the efforts to update corners of the story with modern touches like cell phones, Gen-Z slang, and social media don’t do a whole lot -aside from one musical number bent around something going viral that rips its idea off of Dear Evan Hansen. Few of the musical numbers are terrible, but as stated they generally don’t leave an impression. The one that seems to be the big hit of the stage production and that consequently the movie fixates exponentially on is “World Burn”, Regina’s villain song for when she executes her revenge. But in spite of Rapp and the directors’ best efforts, it doesn’t achieve the lustre it aspires for -not with the choices made in this format at least (I get the impression this song plays well on stage).
Despite the film taking itself a lot more seriously, it is broadly disingenuous -completely fuelled by nostalgia for the original Mean Girls and it never attempts to hide it. It jingles all the references and popular jokes while suppressing or else misunderstanding that wry punk sharpness that made the original a millennial classic. The musical numbers and new measures of tone and sensitivity are a shallow veneer of a fresh take -they don’t build on or re-contextualize the story in any meaningful way. All it does is prove that the cycle of cynical nostalgia reboots has officially come for the aughts, and that this current generation will most likely be deprived of their own equivalent to Mean Girls as a result.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...