Skip to main content

It Doesn’t End or Begin, Just Changes Form


Images do most of the talking in All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt, the moving and masterful directorial debut by Raven Jackson. They are strikingly precise and evocative images too, that communicate far more than mere words could get across. It’s as though Jackson, wishing to present a tapestry of the life of a black woman in Mississippi primarily between what appears to be about the 1960s and 1990s, realized she couldn’t sum up such a thing in dialogue. The feelings around what she needed to express were so potent and abstract, she had to translate them another way -she needed to translate them in any way she could.
All Dirt Roads Taste of Salt is singularly one of the most powerful films of 2023, as it in largely non-verbal snapshots dances between moments in the life of Mackenzie or “Mack” (Kaylee Nicole Johnson, Charleen McClure, Zainab Jah) as she navigates loss and love and self-discovery. We’re introduced to Mack as a child, fishing with her father, admiring the seeming glamour of her mother, soon crushing on a neighbour boy Wood -and then we glean from episodes throughout the years her varied feelings and experiences related to these relationships.
Mack’s life is not shown to us in instalments of much sustained duration; the snippets themselves are not particularity dramatic -they’ll be subdued or inauspicious- and yet highly consequential on a personal level. A slight scene of Mack’s mother (Sheila Atim) demonstrating how to skin a fish will come back in Mack and her sister Josie (Moses Ingram) teaching daughter Lily to do the same; a romantic kiss between a young adult Mack and Wood(Preston McDowell) on a hike juxtaposed with her child-self being taught to practice kissing on her hand. And then giving way to more meaningful moments: Mack the child watching helplessly as her family house burns, Mack the mother cradling her pregnant belly in the bathtub, Mack the elder taking in nature by a creek, the sounds of birds and the wind a cacophony around her, as she passes her hand through the water and dirt -just as she did as a child.
Dirt…and water. Two vital elements. An early scene sees Mack and her mother digging for dirt along the side of a road. Later her grandmother explains its symbolic weight. Dirt being what we all come from, that we must “find” the right dirt as ourselves and each other -and it is something that Mack will carry with her throughout her life, proudly declaring her child is made of dirt, and water. The water fosters the dirt, gives life to it and to everything else. Perhaps it is why Mack likes being out in the rain. Perhaps it lends comfort to a life tainted by some misery and regret.
It is a life in which an absent mother and the trauma of her death casts a long shadow that dissuades Mack from motherhood herself, a choice which comes with its own loss of what might have been a great love. But it is also a life where some contentedness is ultimately found in spite of this, in which a sense of meaning is ascertained, even if it is vague to all but Mack (and perhaps Jackson). And all of it is communicated richly by an artist who sees cinema as less of a page and more of a canvas -discarding conventional tools of dialogue and linearity to broach that kind of deeper sensation the girls’ grandmother imbues in them. Jackson reminds us of the power of visual storytelling. Really, we don’t need words to know what Mack is referring to when as a teenager she asks her sister if she ever wonders “what it would feel like” mere minutes after we saw her as a child grieving the death of her mother. Or the symbolism of the sound of rain over a grown Mack and her father (Chris Chalk) looking out on a sunny field in the aftermath of Josie’s wedding. Or of course one of the key scenes of the film where we see Mack and Wood reunited as adults long before seeing the reason for their split and in their casual minimalist conversation the fathoms of sadness at the lost opportunity for love between them. There is an unspoken need to hug and it lasts a few minutes as Jackson lovingly fixates on the little details of their embrace, and their hands most emphatically.
There are a lot of shots of hands in this movie, we almost see more detailed hands than we do faces -and in all manner of actions: grasping, clutched, clasped, outstretched, and held, especially held. An extremely evocative image (one of many in the film) is that of an elderly hand held by two young ones, the contrast in their complexions vivid in the tight framing. Jackson taps into that eternal symbol of love with a kind of reverence; she’ll linger on it, invite you to consider the profound emotion that comes out of this simple mode of connecting people to one another, to homes and traditions as well as to loved ones. To Jackson it appears touch is the primary essential sense, and so the hands are the most important features we have for interacting with the world and each other. She demonstrates that plainly with her prolonged fixation on them even sometimes through spoken dialect. One senses the primacy she sees in the work of the hands, the context of time and place that forces you to consider the lineage of this motif -both the generations of toil and bondage that such black hands were made use of, and also the solidarity, dependence and connectivity forged out of that uniquely shared cultural trauma. Mack does not openly dwell much on the miasma of black American history and identity, but it shapes her nonetheless.
The movie is edited with a subtle brilliance. Sections are linked by themes sure, and a couple very nice match cuts. The general flow pertaining to this is chronological, with digressions to other points in time mere bursts, and yet at the birth of Mack’s daughter Lily -whom she will give to her sister to raise, Jackson inverts this trajectory in a way that evokes sense memory. Her maternal circumstances conjures up the tenderness of her mother when she was an infant, the love she showed her evolving into the affections she felt later for Wood and subsequently the circumstances that broke them up. Love and loss are interconnected in a way that for Mack is both beautiful and heartbreaking. So too is the cyclical story she finds herself ensconced in, passing on the wisdom and perspective her grandmother did. Tradition is an important touchstone the movie argues, especially in a community like this -Mack at one point cast literally at the end of a long succession of elder black women and men.
Perhaps I make it sound impenetrable, pretentious or showy, but the movie is not any of these things. In fact it comes across decidedly humble in its approach. Though I’d wager Jackson is influenced by any or all of them, there is more the delicate reflectiveness of Kelly Reichardt than the unmoving atmosphere of Hou Hsiao-hsien, more the evoking spiritualism of Terence Malick than the abiding intensity of Andrei Tarkovsky, more the sustained subtlety of Chantel Ackerman than the laborious patience of Apichatpong Weeresathakul. Yet in its gratitude to all of these precedents, it is innately singular. Jackson’s truest sources are enigmatic but easy to presume. Her veneration for them is the greatest of several qualities that makes her movie one of the first true successors to Daughters of the Dust.
There isn’t much spoken in this movie, but what is said really matters. You get the sense of every line’s intent meaning, crystallizing the core of what Jackson is expressing. Likewise she uses music sparingly, almost exclusively a sombre yet profound motif by Sasha Gordon and Victor Magro recurring a few times as perhaps a symbol of momentous revelation. It’s last appearance is one of the great musical moments of the year, ahead of an affirmation of the inspired cycle and the significance of dirt.
Every life path comes with some bitterness. Maybe that’s what is meant by “all dirt roads taste of salt.” Some experiences and choices in life are hard to take, leave scars, yet ultimately they influence our perception of the world and our place within it in holistically pure ways. Altogether and after a time, it may be found salt doesn’t taste so bad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day