Skip to main content

Futurama Reviews: S08E09 -"The Prince and the Product"


 Futurama loves but is not particularly good at anthology episodes. Don’t get me wrong, the two “Anthology of Interest” episodes from the show’s original run are great, and I do quite like “Reincarnation” from the end of season six as well. But during the Comedy Central run, the show took a real gimmick-heavy approach to this type of episode, to diminishing returns. “Saturday Morning Fun Pit” is worse than “Naturama” which was worse than “The Futurama Holiday Spectacular”.  It was when these episodes came around that I most felt like the show was running out of ideas, or else needed an episode of filler for the production order. And “The Prince and the Product” unfortunately continues that trend.
Written by series veteran Eric Kaplan, apparently with his son Ari John Kaplan, this episode re-imagines your Futurama cast favourites as generic variations of well-known children’s toys: wind-up Lego-like figures, Hot Wheels cars, and rubber ducks and eggs. However, before we get into these, we need to address the nonsensical framing device, which is completely divorced from the mini-stories and has absolutely no thematic tie-in to product placement. It’s also pretty bad on its own, functioning initially as a misdirect as to what the episode will be about. The Planet Express makes a delivery to the never-before-mentioned Prince of Space, who puts a love spell on Leela while the King disapproves, and through some weird nobility Fry ends up challenging the King to a duel on behalf of Leela’s apparent desire to marry the prince. Ultimately, Leela fights the duel in Fry’s place, accidentally killing the Prince, who secretly fought in the King’s place, and everything is resolved. The plot is broken up by “commercials” where the other stories play out, but it must be noted just how bizarre these stretches of the episode are and how badly it integrates with the main gimmick. Even if you take it as pure silliness, like an anthology segment itself, it’s still really shabby writing, with little care taken towards characters or jokes or the basic premise itself. Everything that happens is pure lazy convenience and it serves no point other than to fill out time.
And it’s not surprising this show needed time to fill out, as there’s barely enough material in the product stories to last the six to seven minutes they do. The first, a Wind-O story, is the most confused, playing out some meagre fear of death theme as Fry faces an impending demise related to cold circuits from the freezing tube; he’s saved by Bender but Bender then dies and experiences reincarnation. All the while beyond a couple sight gags, not much is made of their construction –and certainly the animation isn’t anything interesting. In fact, nothing experimental is done with the animation through any of these –which is part of the fun when a cartoon commits to a bit like this.
So the second story’s creativity is limited to just designing the characters off of Pixar’s Cars. Here the lack of imagination is really felt as so much is simply borrowed from stuff Futurama has done before. We already saw Bender as a car in “The Honking”, a looping Hot Wheels racetrack was already illustrated in “2-D Blacktop”, and a serial killer among the Planet Express crew had been touched upon much better in both the first “Anthology of Interest” and “Murder on the Planet Express”. There is the seed of a funny idea in casting Zoidberg as an Ed Gein-type, but in this format it’s just stale.
The last segment is the one that comes closest to working, if only for how it plays its Fry and Leela story. About half the characters are rubber ducks who on a mission of exploration meet the other characters who are eggs, and Fry the duck and Leela the egg instantly fall in love –sparking a feud between the two groups who go to war over this relationship. In the end, even Fry and Leela are dead, though they each manage to reproduce (asexually it would appear) a Fry egg and a duck Leela who go off into the sunset together. A cute resolution, though the story behind it amounts to so little.
Each sequence has maybe one or two gags that stand out or warrant a smirk, but by and large they are pretty boring. Once again I have to wonder if the show is too indebted to its old jokes –Fortune Teller robot appears again recycling dialogue beats from “The Honking” for instance. Yet what new moments of interest show up here are few and far between. There doesn’t appear to be a lot of heart put into anything on this episode –the Kaplans and the writing staff seemingly have as much enthusiasm as Jon Vitti did on The Simpsons when assigned to write clip shows. It’s just altogether bland. We’re almost at the end of this first chunk of season eight, and an episode like “The Prince and the Product” really highlights its deficiencies and a consistent trend towards the general mediocrity The Simpsons has been ensconced in the last twenty-two years. I don’t want that for Futurama and I hope that next week’s season finale can restore my faith.
Now for some stray observations:
  • Oh, how I wish based off the title the episode could have been a satire of commercialism rather than a cheeky tribute to it.
  • Speaking of which, I could believe the whole frame story was reverse-engineered from that title, which isn’t even a very good one to begin with.
  • I don’t know if I’d been distracted before and didn’t notice or it was just a weird thing with this episode in particular, but in various places  Fry’s voice sounded older and heavier to me. I know that some voice actors as they get older can have difficulty maintaining certain character voices -I’ve only recently noticed how different Julie Kavner’s current Marge Simpson voice is to what it was in the 90s. But Billy West hasn’t had this difficulty before -though granted Fry is one of his few remaining young characters.
  • Why did the music in the first segment sound so much like the theme from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
  • So the duck army was clearly led by Zapp and Kif, but who was the guy leading the egg army? You think they’d put a recurring character in that role, but I have no idea who that helmeted guy is.
  • “Wind-Os: Roughly a Minute of Fun” is one of the few good jokes I’ll grant this episode.
  • On the other hand, Bender crying “I can’t look” while covering his eyes, then saying “oh now I can” when he moves his hands away, is a shockingly, impressively lazy joke that the writer ought to have their comedy licence revoked for. Also, I don’t know that an episode has had a lamer final gag than Leela substituting “magic spell” for “science spell” on the Professor’s insistence. No effort whatsoever.
  • Let it be borne in mind that Eric Kaplan’s previous Futurama credits include “Hell is Other Robots”, “Parasites Lost”, and “Jurassic Bark”. Damn! Since leaving Futurama, he’s written for The Big Bang Theory, which is as good a scapegoat as any for this episode.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...