Skip to main content

A Haunted Mansion That Nobody Cared to Visit


The baffling decision on Disney’s part to put their new Haunted Mansion movie out at the end of July is one of those corporate marketing decisions I’ll never understand. It’s in the middle of a slew of other big releases it has no chance of sticking out against in the middle of summer. And it’s subject matter positions it perfectly for tapping into the family-friendly Halloween season market, of which it likely wouldn’t have much competition. Unless the studio had utterly no faith in it whatsoever, it makes no sense to release it now when they did. Already poised to be yet another failure in a year full of them, it almost certainly would have made more back later in the year.
Of course a later release date wouldn’t have solved the problems with this second movie adaptation of one of Disneyland’s most popular attractions; a movie that at one point was going to be helmed by Guillermo del Toro -yet another to add to his stack of unrealized projects. Instead it comes after years languishing in development hell through a script by Kate Dippold and Dear White People director Justin Simien. And while it is another naked attempt to simply cash in on a prominent Disney I.P. that has laid dormant for twenty years, it does have a few strong story qualities and sparks of visual ingenuity going for it. Unfortunately, it fails to engage with these in much of an effective way.
Comparisons will inevitably be made to the earlier 2003 Eddie Murphy vehicle that is nostalgically beloved by folks of my generation but is mostly bad, so it’s worth pointing out right away that the set-up for this version at least is much more promising. The plot is about a group of disparate characters brought to the Haunted Mansion, a creepy abandoned estate outside New Orleans, forced by circumstance to work together to free themselves of its haunting influence. A fairly traditional set-up for a haunted house story -bearing more than a couple hallmarks of The Haunting in fact (ironic, given one of its stars, Owen Wilson, appeared in the terrible 1999 remake of that classic). Meanwhile the emotional crux of the movie centres on the grief of protagonist Ben (LaKeith Stanfield), a ghost tours operator in mourning over the death of his wife in a car accident.
These are some smart story choices, and the creative nature of the Mansion’s effects -wherein anyone who sets foot inside is haunted by its ghosts wherever they go- is a nice excuse for assembling a misfit ensemble to engineer a found family theme as a mode of moving on from loss. And they are a charming bunch on paper: Rosario Dawson and Chase W. Dillon as a mother and son who were looking to rent the place, Owen Wilson as an enigmatic, optimistic street preacher, Tiffany Haddish as a halfway-competent medium, and Danny DeVito as an eccentric old professor with an expertise in haunted houses. There’s a lot of good contrast there in not only character types but performance sensibilities. Conceptually it works great, but in practice requires a certain level of commitment on the part of the script and the cast that is simply not there in the finished product.
There is something distinctly hollow to how the film develops both its setting and its characters and I suspect it is attached to the overall fidelity to the source attraction. The plot’s momentum is almost entirely determined by re-creations of set-pieces or bits of lore from the attraction, with only minimal character focus around it. Apart from Ben, his grieving backstory, and a late-revealed parallel situation for the kid Travis, the script isn’t much at all invested in the story potential of these other characters in spite of their complimentary nature. Scraps of manufactured dialogue and awkward jokes are thus all they have to work with. DeVito and Haddish are particularly ill-served by this, playing merely to a cliché of their screen personas -though even Wilson, closer to a highlight, struggles to feign much interest in his performance through certain sequences. The lack of enthusiasm can be felt in this, the desperation in the script to make some kind of connection through hackneyed quipping and sequences that lack cohesion; like a visit to another minimally-relevant estate for a Macguffin and a flashback meant to impart some kind of importance on the Mansion’s architect Gracey (J.R. Adduci) and crystal ball medium Madame Leota (Jamie Lee Curtis –in a stunningly poor performance from her).
The Mansion itself is not particularly interesting visually, like its namesake an archetypal haunted house if ever there was one. And the movie’s efforts to disorient as to its contours and geography are far too broad –endless corridors or open chasms- as though Simien were trying to emulate The Shining, but without any mood. He clearly wants to go further with the scariness than Disney will allow, and does manage to introduce a couple creepy ghost designs and tame jump scare moments. But Disney put the brakes on del Toro’s concept for being too scary so it’s no surprise they allow for very little horror flavouring here.  Any inventive editing and camera-work during the major supernatural sequences is also undercut by the dull effects and the pale cinematography. The earlier movie was not good, but it was shot with some spatial intent and gothic atmosphere. The only choices that seem interesting here are done simply to mimic the effect of the ride -and not often very well.
If anything in the film comes close to being earnest, it is the conversation it engages in with the subject of grief. The consistency of its interests here are spotty –Ben inquires if a séance would allow him to speak to his wife, and no sooner is this denied than the movie moves on with its other priorities. But there are a few unexpectedly mature connotations to the way that it is handled, especially in a moment late in the film between Ben and Travis –who has been all this time silently grieving his late father. Simien gives it some space and allows Ben’s catharsis an honest emotionality, but it too can’t escape the movie’s general strands of cynicism. The ultimate statement on getting over grief feels a little too clean, and in service of a very conventional resolution. It’s a shame because a context like the Haunted Mansion is a great way to explore this theme intelligently.
Haunted Mansion very well could have been an intelligent movie, but due to Disney writing it off before it even began, it never had a chance. Its bones are still pretty good, it even has a decent joke here and there, but it is so artificial and passionless that it’s hard to find respite in these. A Disney movie that no one really wanted and that the studio approached with lacklustre enthusiasm themselves –not a winning combination for any kind of good product.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day