Skip to main content

A Vapid Cretaceous Thriller


I think a lot of movie fans and commentators take for granted the success of the Jurassic World movies. Generally dismissed as quality movies though they may be, the first and third especially were major box office hits, the former being the eighth highest grossing movie of all time and the latter the third highest grossing movie of 2022. Dinosaurs, even thinly rendered CGI ones, are popular with audiences. But outside of the Jurassic franchise nobody has really tried to make a big budget movie with dinosaurs -largely I suspect because the action that would necessitate a human component  requires certain broad leaps of plotting there’s no guarantee an audience would be on board for. To not look like a total conceptual rip-off of the Jurassic movies, it’s either got to involve time travel or aliens (or just be another adaptation of The Lost World).
65 goes for the latter, envisioning a technologically advanced humanoid civilization on another planet around the time the dinosaurs ruled this earth. And wouldn’t you know it, on what seems to be a charter expedition one of their spaceships collides with heavy asteroid debris and crash-lands on Earth, killing everyone but the pilot and one young passenger now forced to survive and find a way off this dinosaur-infested rock. It’s directed by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods, writers of A Quiet Place, and certainly bears several of that movie’s signatures -in that broad apocalyptic-adjacent concept and probably most notably in a penchant for jump scares. In the directors chair themselves though, they prove a perhaps underwritten competence in John Krasinski, as without him they are largely rudimentary in their approach to the action-horror elements. No jump scare is in any way exciting if there’s not a sufficient atmosphere around it.
There’s a startling lack of creativity to its narrative and its world too that is almost certainly less to do with Beck and Woods’ input as it is general product strategy. I mean it wouldn’t hit those desired Jurassic franchise sweet spots if the main character “alien” was a ten foot tall translucent Martian with antennae and three digits on each hand. I’ll grant that the introduction of diverse languages within this civilization which makes for a communication obstacle between the two protagonists is interesting and novel; but the fact that this highly evolved ancient alien race is visibly, tangibly human by all other conceivable metrics is just dull. Adam Driver plays a character, a member of a supposedly far-advanced interstellar species, called Mills, and his weapon of choice is just a generic sci-fi laser gun. The basics of sociology, biology, technology all easily correspond to modern American counterparts and it’s a failure of imagination the whole way through.  
Mills’ relationship with the girl Koa (Ariana Greenblatt) only accentuates this, a typical pairing that rarely transcends its simplest structural functions. Her defining character trait is wanting to find her family, though the certainty of their death leaves little to invest in as she and Mills journey towards the back half wreckage of the ship and their only way off planet. He meanwhile is saddled with some drama around his daughter, whom Koa quickly becomes a surrogate of, and who may die of an illness before he gets home. This too plays out drearily, through a series of tritely sentimental videos and holographic messages that cheaply endeavour to buff up the stakes by implying a greater severity than is either earned or followed through on. Driver and Greenblatt make do with the material but it’s not anywhere interesting enough to convincingly convey a meaningful surrogate relationship, especially as the script resorts to filling it out with false alarm perils and misunderstandings as a device for conflict.
All the movie has going for it is its action, and Beck and Woods know it. Around every corner they position a dinosaur attack, and yet most of these can’t conjure much excitement. Virtually all of the creatures Mills and Koa come into contact with are fast, carnivorous, and deadly -unspecified but for a few tyrannosaur-like giants. There is no curiosity or specificity to them, they are mere horror monster drones; and in their deployment the directors are overly reliant on conventional jump-scare tactics to illicit tension, and treading in the footsteps of the Jurassic movies in the composition of the action, compared to which 65 has no sequence that is interesting or original. An apex predator corners the pair in a rain-swept cave, the saving of a juvenile proves hazardous, two great therapods attack their vehicle as they try to escape. The one pretty good original set-piece is a dry desolation of acid geysers that makes an appearance early on, and that even the filmmakers must realize was pretty neat as they return to it in the climax (in spite of the amount of ground covered by the protagonists since then) for the final confrontation between man (or man-alien) and beast.
And this of course happens against the backdrop of the great Cretaceous extinction event, which is enacted as a ticking clock for the heroes to get off planet in perhaps the movie’s most overt bit of grandiose cheese (the film hilariously cuts to the asteroid a few times as a reminder of its imminence).  The movie was already operating from a place of silliness masquerading as something of substance, but this element takes it over the top in a way that feels less thrilling than it is obvious and dull. Of course this was where it was going to end, why wouldn’t it? The extinction climax is just the broadest of several ways 65 misunderstands the inherent dumbness of its premise and irrelevance of its tone. The title card on both the poster and in the movie itself comes as a preface to the phrase “…million years ago, prehistoric Earth had a visitor”, and yet still it seems to think it can take itself seriously as a thriller-horror movie. It’s ending basically plays as Armageddon trying to be Aliens.
65 is a movie that has hardly anything going for it beyond its central nifty idea. In spite of its intentions to lean more into the horror of the premise, rarely does it offer anything that isn’t a shadow of something from a Jurassic franchise or other like B-movie entry. Dinosaurs are very cool and it would be a shame for them to be confined to just one ultimately mediocre film series the way pirates have been for the last couple decades. But if those with creative power in Hollywood can’t come up with anything more than a hollow pitch like this movie is, maybe they are better staying extinct.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day