Skip to main content

Strong Performances Don’t Empower Quotidian PTSD Drama


Causeway was meant to be Apple TV+’s follow-up to CODA. Here’s another rather basic drama about an awards-bait-y theme featuring actors in just the right kind of performances of grounded seriousness that could net them Oscar nominations if campaigned in the right ways -and indeed that is what happened for one of them. But Causeway hasn’t had the same momentum as its’ bewilderingly successful predecessor. It came and went on its’ release like CODA, without much passionate conversation around it, but unlike CODA it hasn’t reappeared in the Academy’s voting results beyond a single nomination for Brian Tyree Henry that is well deserved for the exceptional actor but not at all one he’s likely to win.
Because of this general oversight I didn’t have the expectations going into Causeway as I did with CODA at the time of its’ then astonishing series of major nominations. But that didn’t endear me to the movie in the way it might have had the film been more ambitious. What it is is an actors’ showcase, dealing in a story that revolves around trauma and PTSD for the purposes of challenging the capacities of its’ stars without bringing much new to a topic that has been covered in film countless times before.
I’m not saying the movie is necessarily cynical for this. Plenty of great films are built more around gauging a particular performance from an actor than on any real merit of story or technique. In fact Jennifer Lawrence herself has done at least one film like that, 2015’s Joy. The thing is, nobody remembers Joy anymore, and the same is likely to be true of Causeway (despite being led by better performances than that film) the moment awards’ season ends.
It is the filmmaking debut of theatre director Lila Neugebauer, and her background with the stage can be gleaned by the fact she fills her supporting cast out with Tony-winner luminaries like Jayne Houdyshell, Linda Emond, and Stephen McKinley Henderson. But at the centre of the film is Jennifer Lawrence as Lynsey, an Afghan War vet in recovery for a brain injury sustained during an IED explosion, in New Orleans where she struggles to adjust to civilian life again -depressed and eager to re-enlist against the recommendations of her doctor. As she’s going through this she happens to befriend an auto-mechanic James (Henry), himself haunted by a tragic car accident that resulted in the death of his nephew and the loss of his leg.
The relationship between Lynsey and James is the heart of the movie, and by far where it is most successful and distinct. That specific and consciously underplayed bond between survivors of trauma is well articulated here in how the pair form a relatively quick understanding while still not exactly being on the same page. For instance James appears to be at least mildly romantically interested in Lynsey, which it takes a little while for her to gently shoot down (she’s gay in fact). They’re not completely honest with each other for understandable reasons, and this rift that remains between them and their experiences ultimately comes out in conflict and heightened emotions. Lawrence and Henry have good chemistry, something they apparently worked on for months in quarantine before shooting commenced, and it’s a believable, complex relationship for this.
There is a range to their personalities dependent on mood or intoxication, and it seems especially apparent with James. Those silent, despondent moments where he is mentally trapped in that painful memory are probably what got Henry his awards acknowledgements this cycle. He really plays so vividly the enduring presence of his trauma and the horrifying guilt threatening to consume him. But while Henry is the sharper stand-out, Lawrence also manages to give her best performance in several years as the hollowed-out vet trying to cope with a few different issues she keeps under her belt. The script doesn’t quite allow us to feel her pain and she’s generally quite detached, but Lawrence nonetheless taps into a resonant behavioural type, a quiet desperation for purpose and peace of mind. The movie marks her first as producer as well as star -indicating a greater conviction, and it does show through.
However beyond these performances the film is oftentimes inert. Neugebauer doesn’t offer much in the way of sharp cinematic direction, her focus is understandably more towards the actors than the framing or editing -each of which is perfectly competent and uncompelling; there’s little creativity in the way the plot is laid out, and the story itself, grounded though it may be, is uninspired. Several movies and countless documentaries have taken on the theme of PTSD and veterans re-entering civilian life -even in relation to tours in Afghanistan specifically. And while it’s a very multi-faceted topic with evergreen arenas to explore, Causeway doesn’t approach it from any original vantage point -and adds little to the conversation that hasn’t been articulated better by other movies or in other forms. The relationship between Lynsey and James is the only curious facet to an otherwise stale story, and even that is fairly nebulous to the specificity of her experience. It doesn’t have much a comment to make on the war or veterans, stays strictly apolitical as much as it can, and even avoids those devices that might create a starker picture of what she’s going through –no flashbacks, no psychological tremors, just a kind of aimless frustration. The result is a slog of a plot buoyed only by performances that hint at deep characterization without a narrative willing to back them up; and that comes to the most obvious resolution it could possibly conceive.
Despite the differences in what they went through the movie seems to equate both Lynsey and James’ traumas by frequently bringing them up against one another, though of course giving her recovery the greater attention; tying it into a more concerted purpose whilst what he went through was just an accident. James does have the more intriguing experience, the one that makes for more unconventional drama, and a better movie might have reversed their roles with regards to emphasis. Of course in truth they can’t be compared, and on some level the movie understands this as well –it’s a cornerstone to the close yet cautious relationship that develops between them. There’s a strange disconnect here between the subjective and objective lenses of the script and I wonder if it might just be a case of Neugebauer misunderstanding it in her execution. Whatever the idea it goes through a rough translation.
A handful of scenes in Causeway are well worth watching, mostly for Lawrence and especially Henry. In some respects, it is a quieter, measured, less chaotic and more respectable version of another Apple TV+ movie about a war vet, Cherry. But it is still a version, and these kind of movies need more ingenuity and perspective to be engaging. There’s only so far that actors’ laurels can take it.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more