Skip to main content

Empty and Tedious, Quantumania Eschews Competence for Brand Initiation


Marvel has rarely been terribly grounded as a media franchise. For a long time now it has primarily been concerned with its grandiose world or universe-threatening affairs and the stories of heroes and their relationships to other heroes. That’s why the Ant-Man movies have been kind of refreshing. Compared to the big guns of Iron Man, Captain America or Thor, they’ve been low, personal-stakes action-comedies centred on the only Avenger who could reasonably pass for an ordinary guy: a San Francisco working class ex-con whose humble life goals and relationships, including with his ex-wife and daughter, are as important as his superhero-ing. Directed by Peyton Reed, both Ant-Man and Ant-Man and the Wasp, though not necessarily the cream of Marvel’s crop, have been fun and charming movies for this -among the few MCU movies I’ve had the desire to go back and revisit.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania throws all of that out. And though Reed is once again at the helm, he seemingly has no control over matters of tone, aesthetic, or even action and character. It feels nothing like the other Ant-Man movies, instead it is something more inert, more micromanaged, more desperate to assert its importance for the future of this next phase in the MCU. In many ways it is just as drastic a shift as Thor: Ragnarok was for its respective series -except in the opposite direction of quality.
The movie starts off in a semblance of that light tone that characterized its predecessors. But the conspicuous absence of all of Scott Lang’s non-superhero connections is the first and perhaps biggest red flag. No Michael Peña and his “La Cucaracha”-honking van, no Judy Greer and Bobby Cannavale as Scott’s concerned though friendly ex-family -even Randall Park’s good-natured parole officer is limited to a brief shot in a montage sequence. And sadly this seems to be reflected in a subtle change to Scott’s character, where he has cashed in on his Avengers fame with a book deal and apparent ego boost, and adopted as his primary social circle (as well as that for his daughter Cassie) the Pym family of fellow shrinking superheroes.
This reality is only momentarily established, along with a shallow layer of new identity for Cassie that pays disingenuous lip service to police brutality towards activists, before sucking its central cast down into the quantum realm, a CGI-rendered subatomic universe that the rest of the movie’s plot plays out in. Setting aside the awkward pacing and story structure that will continue to plague the movie, the Quantum Realm as established in the previous Ant-Man movie, is not actually that interesting a concept or environment -much as there is creativity poured into it here. Essentially it is just another version of the Marvel cosmic universe seen in the Guardians of the Galaxy and Thor movies, somewhat interesting-looking (though its aesthetic, similar to Disney’s Strange World, is likewise ultimately insubstantial), but without any real character. Both in scope and in style it’s reminiscent of the imaginative worlds of the Star Wars prequels, but as in the Star Wars prequels it is ultimately hollow. The dictatorial regime is a bit rote and the denizens’ personalities remain fixed to that hollow brand quippiness. They got William Jackson Harper and even Bill Murray to some extent doing it, neither of whom is particularly invested in where they are.
That seems to be shared with the main cast. Paul Rudd to his credit is giving a solid effort, although the film severely limits or else mishandles his core strength as a performer -his comedic delivery- in favour of a generally more serious take on the character that tries to define him as a formidable hero directly going up against the MCU’s new Thanos. Even in this capacity however he fares a lot better than Evangeline Lilly (who is a titular character) and Michael Douglas sleepwalking through the film and its intangible elements. Michelle Pfeiffer is gifted a larger part  and a backstory that mostly functions as MCU set-up with little personal interest attached, while Kathryn Newton, newly cast as Cassie Lang -who of course is now a junior Ant-Man herself, struggles to find a distinct angle to this generic spunky teenager of Scott’s. She is perhaps the clearest, though not by any means only victim of a shabby, disorganized script.
And it’s clear the movie as a whole is not really about Ant-Man and his family -the distinction of their powers is virtually moot in this environment where shrinking in size means nothing (there’s no relatable context for it to be even slightly creative). No, the point of the movie from the vantage of the larger universe is just to formally establish the next big villain: Kang the Conqueror, played by Jonathan Majors. Majors made his debut at the end of the Loki series on Disney+, though thankfully this movie isn’t wholly linked to that in its use of the character. The fact that Kang is really a collection of multiverse duplicates allows Majors to play incarnations differently which is good, because while in Loki he was fairly charming and imposing, here the performance is a lot more wild with contradictions. He’ll go from cool and controlling to campy and operatic within the span of a scene -Majors makes some unusual choices with his line-readings. He’s at least different from several Marvel villain predecessors, but it remains to be seen whether he can sustain a performance consistent enough to be properly menacing. All through the climax he’s just kinda petulant.
It is worthy though of the movie’s tone, which struggles to find a bridge between the goofy and the serious, making efforts to couch elements of one within the other. Like when Scott is being literally drowned by infinite self-creating duplicates -one of whom is a callback to the Baskin Robbins gag from previous movies, and only manages to pull through via determination to save his daughter. Or how one character turns an act of violence committed against them into a payoff on a lame joke. And as an aside, most of the films’ efforts at humour fall flat -this script substitutes Community’s Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers for Rick and Morty’s Jeff Loveness. Probably the single greatest example of the failed efforts to blend tones is in the character of MODOK, whose actor I can’t reveal for spoiler-y reasons. MODOK, a Marvel comics character popular through irony for being just a giant floating head with tiny arms and legs, is one of the movie’s most awkward and ill-placed additions. But of course a live-action MODOK is terrifying, rendered here as a giant ugly stretched out human face that no efforts at mildly self-conscious humour can distract from. And this combination of hideous VFX with an overwrought comic attitude and an attempt at pathos that the script can never decide how much to commit to makes for a bewildering aspect to the movie, perfectly representative of its larger problems.
The last act is a complete mess, beginning with a badly integrated plot point involving ants that betrays how often the film forgets who its lead character is. A theme on revolution is sidelined by preferred focus on the heroes and a series of reversals as to the big fight with Kang, including a final cheap one that neuters a potentially interesting endpoint. And it is here where what little believability in the environment as drawn is completely subsumed by CGI miasma –nothing but the actor’s faces have any degree of depth to them.
Quantumania was approached creatively as a stepping stone rather than a continuation of the series it ostensibly belongs to -the cast could pretty closely be swapped out for that of any other MCU series and the movie wouldn’t be tangibly different. All that matters is establishing Kang as the new overarching antagonist for the next few years, giving hints at what devastation he’ll bring, and raising the stakes for the MCU broadly. Marvel has done this dance several times before, but not since Infinity War has an individual story been so dwarfed by set-up, even as this story is at least allowed to wrap up in a relatively self-contained way. But it’s also missing the fun that characterized the other Ant-Man movies, the sense of humility that goes along with a hero whose main powers are to shrink in size and command ants. It’s a dull, tedious and over-complicated affair –and only promises more of that for Marvel’s immediate future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day