Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Summertime (1955)


The trajectory of David Lean’s career as a filmmaker is probably defined by 1955’s Summertime, a movie that is both his first international production and by some account his personal favourite. It rather finely bridges the line between the British dramas and Dickens adaptations that he had made to great acclaim in the U.K. and the stately foreign-set epics that would bring him greater attention and technical praise through to the end of his career. Summertime was his first movie filmed on location abroad in a picturesque environment -Venice to be exact. Reportedly, he fell in love with the city, and it’s not hard to see the connection between this experience and his subsequent career shift. The very next movie he would make after it would be The Bridge on the River Kwai.
Summertime came to the collection quite recently, and is his only movie after the 1940s currently afforded a place there (though I assume the absence of his epics is because of their own distribution companies). It’s a rather curious movie, produced through the U.S., U.K., and Italy, that sends Katharine Hepburn, its’ only star of name recognition, to Venice for an autumn years love story. She plays a secretary from Akron, Ohio (in spite of her classic transatlantic accent) who has longed to visit Venice and saved up for it for years. Jane Hudson is polite, charming, and very enthusiastic about her dream city, but is also terribly lonely and transparently sad as she sits in a cafe by herself or takes in the tourist attractions solo. She makes a few friends of course, other Americans staying at the same pensione as her, but they are in pairs and she feels a touch awkward in their company. She retreats at learning she would be an imposition on their sightseeing tour to Murano after she asks to join -later at risk of being spotted by them in a cafe (indeed in the hopes she would be), she arranges the second chair at her table and her refreshments to look as though someone were seated there with her -but they don’t notice her. It’s some of the tenderest acting I’ve seen from Hepburn, who hadn’t often played women like this, so quietly lonesome and desperate. And in fact the movie itself paints a pretty authentic portrait of travelling by oneself.
I don’t use that metaphor whimsically, this is in fact a very visually charming movie. It was only Lean’s second in technicolour, first in over a decade, and it looks so rich and lovely, the jovial spectrum reflecting its’ ornate setting. The film does effectively act as tourism propaganda for Venice, but then that’s not terribly hard to do for the place often touted the most beautiful city in the world. All of the awe the movie has for it works too in relation to Jane’s frame of mind -she is so enamoured with it, grinning at everything she sees and taking pictures on that old box camera of hers. The atmosphere is so potently related in a way it had no chance of being had the film shot in studio. And obviously of course it is ripe for a romance.
Jane meets Renato de Rossi (Rossano Brazzi) in an antiques shop where he flirts with her and sells her a red goblet from the 18th century, teaching her of the bargaining method to sales transactions that is apparently the norm in Italy. They both make independent efforts to see each other again, and each time they meet the love affair becomes more overt. And it’s interesting the way that the film depicts Jane’s repression, her hesitations to pursue things with Renato, while he plays to her curiosity as persuasion. On the one hand it is manipulative, but on the other he has a point and Jane could clearly use a little boldness in her life, a little spontaneous pleasure. They do have sex eventually, something which was incredibly controversial with the American censors -especially given Renato was earlier revealed to be legally married (though separated). These little complexities that have Jane in conflict, second-guessing herself, is what makes the romance really fresh and interesting -not to mention the fact that it’s between two middle-aged people.
The bottom line is that Jane needs this Venice swing, she needs to fall in love and have a whirlwind affair in a gorgeous city. Renato basically speaks for the audience when he suggests as much. And in its’ last scenes before she leaves for home, it has that soulful elegance of something like Before Sunrise -Lean knowing how to shoot the city and the characters in relation to it so romantically. Which shouldn’t be a surprise, it’s not his first great movie about a fleeting love affair.

Criterion Recommendation: Terms of Endearment (1983)
I watched Terms of Endearment again recently and while it will always be a second place James L. Brooks film to Broadcast News in my mind, I was still overcome by how thoroughly I enjoyed it. Like Brooks’ other films, it walks a line of sincerity and cynicism well as it tells a heartfelt story of a mother and daughter over a period of about fifteen years, the ups and downs in their love and family lives, and their own nuanced relationship with each other. Shirley MacLaine won the Oscar for it, and she is the biggest acting highlight, but Jack Nicholson (who also won an Oscar) was really striking as well in a more humanistic performance than I’m used to seeing from him. Also Jeff Daniels is a great doofus of a husband. The interplay between MacLaine and Debra Winger is so ingratiating, there’s just an honesty that comes across through Brooks’ script that makes it, for lack of a better word, endearing. Michael Gore’s score is beautiful, the ending is of course as heartbreaking as ever, it’s just an all around wonderful family drama of a type that once really mattered in Hollywood. Criterion has Broadcast News in its’ collection, I think it’s fair that Terms of Endearment be there too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...

The Prince of Egypt: The Humanized Exodus

Moses and the story of the Exodus is one of the most influential mythologies of world history. It’s a centrepoint of the Abrahamic religions, and has directly influenced the society, culture, values, and laws of many civilizations. Not to mention, it’s a very powerful story, and one that unsurprisingly continues to resonate incredibly across the globe. In western culture, the story of Moses has been retold dozens of times in various mediums, most recognizably in the last century through film. And these adaptations have ranged from the iconic: Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments;  to the infamous: Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings . But everyone seems to forget the one movie between those two that I’d argue has them both beat. As perhaps the best telling of one of the most influential stories of all time, I feel people don’t talk about The Prince of Egypt  nearly enough. The 1998 animated epic from DreamWorks is a breathtakingly stunning, concise but compelling, ...