Skip to main content

Parallel Mothers Makes Gripping and Unexpected an Innocuous Premise


It’s interesting to think what the 80s or 90s version of Pedro Almodóvar’s Parallel Mothers would be. Its’ premise, which centres on two mothers who give birth on the same day only to later find that their babies were accidentally swapped, is a natural comedy idea that might be right at home in the farcical sensibilities of something like Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown. Certainly it’s been done before in that format. But Almodóvar has tended more serious as he’s gotten older, and after his beautiful self-reflective Pain and Glory, there was no doubt he would choose to explore more intimately the human drama of whatever circumstance he tackled next. And one such as this is particularly emotionally tense and traumatizing -even as Almodóvar heightens its’ details several degrees.
That is not a criticism, in fact the artificial elements that pop up in Parallel Mothers are among its’ most gripping qualities. They and of course the performance of his frequent muse Penélope Cruz, the outside favourite of this years’ Best Actress race and for good reason. It’s a movie that knows what you might expect from its’ plot, but takes it in some subversive directions that are quite interesting, emotionally complex, and dramatically exciting.
Perhaps the first big noticeable example of this is the general absence of men in this story of motherhood. Cruz’s Janis, a professional photographer, had an affair with a married archaeologist Arturo (Israel Elejalde) that resulted in the pregnancy, but she fairly quickly cuts him off to raise her daughter herself -as has been the tradition of her family, with which she is obsessed. Her counterpart Ana (Milena Smit) similarly without a father figure, was made to go through a pregnancy that was the outcome of rape. And so aside from Janis occasionally contacting Arturo, there are no men in either of their lives post-delivery and the movie itself isn’t much concerned with that. Moreover, it seems to be a matter of personal pride that Janis brings up Cecilia alone -or at least alone with the aid of a nanny whom she is well-off enough to employ. Indeed there’s a level of privilege that courses through the movie and seems connected with the relative independence of Janis, and it’s one that threatens to turn her into Ana’s mother (Aitana Sánchez-Gijón), an impassioned actress struggling to reconcile her career with her desire to be more present for her daughter. In a movie about mothers, she’s the one who perhaps low-key casts the largest shadow.
Almodóvar plays it like a thriller the gradual process that leads to Janis discovering Cecilia isn’t hers, starting with the hint in Arturo noting the childs’ lack of any resemblance to him and her proceeding with an online maternity test conducted in secret. When she finds out she hides the truth, changes her phone number, and pretends that nothing is wrong until Ana resurfaces in her life with the dark news that her child (though really Janis’) to whom she did indeed grow attached, suffered a crib death. Cruz plays aptly the hidden grief in this as Almodóvar shifts these characters towards the inevitable reveal. And it almost feels like Hitchcock, the way he draws that out while adding layers of complexity onto their relationship, beginning with Janis offering Ana a job as her new live-in maid, bringing biological mother and daughter closer -a way of alleviating that guilt perhaps. It’s a really enticing dynamic that despite being built on deceit Almodóvar allows to grow endearing. From Cecilia sparks the root of a genuine bond that creates significant stakes for these women, and an incoming tragedy for when the bough breaks. In the meantime Cruz and Smit share a stirring chemistry and are fantastic stylistic counterparts on top of that.
Smit delivers a terrific performance through her muted demeanour of shameful dependence and closeted trauma. She can convey that underlying misery that haunts this young woman, makes her vulnerable while at the same time prone to starkness in her boundaries -she has no problem cutting off the figures of her old life once she moves in with Janis. Ana is a pitiable character, a sympathetic and emboldened one though, and Smit plays it wonderfully. That she is nonetheless drowned out by Cruz’s performance speaks to the sheer excellence of that veteran actress’ turn in this, one of her career highlights. She encapsulates the devastation and desperation of the circumstances, even in the moments where she has to keep them subdued. Janis is a woman used to a sense of control in her life and that order is thrown into disarray first with the initial revelation and then the re-acquaintance with Ana. But what’s interesting is the choice to open her world to Ana, to essentially share Cecilia and much of her life with her is her own, inviting the complexities and trauma that comes along with it. Seemingly it’s borne out of a deep sympathy and affection, which is intriguing, and it’s a balancing act that Cruz performs wonderfully. She is just as exceptional in these layered acts of humanity as in the more crushing sequences. Every facet of the character feels lived in.
That includes her preoccupation that forms a background subplot of the film, until it is brought forth as a primary focal point for the conclusion. And sadly, it doesn’t much gel with the motherhood storyline. The thing that brings Janis and Arturo together initially is her interest in his excavating a site in her home village, believed to be the unmarked grave of her great-grandfather and several others killed during the purges of the Spanish Civil War. That history and her feelings about her great-grandfather linger nonchalantly through the film, until in the last act Almodóvar shifts gears from the motherhood theme to explicitly re-contextualizing the film around the lingering trauma of the Franco regime. It ends with the bizarre insinuation this was what the film had been about, the Ana-Cecilia side of the story being quietly resolved -as though Almodóvar was Trojan Horsing a politically contentious film on reckoning with a history of fascism inside a more conventional drama. And that’s a noble endeavour for sure, but he doesn’t pull it off -in part through how compelling that greater story is and how little it intertwines with this second hidden narrative, apart from a couple moments like when Janis chastises Ana for being ignorant of her country’s history.
It’s a choice that makes the film considerably less cohesive, but is not enough to break it. As pertaining to that main story, the focus shift resolves it in a kind of muted understanding that fits, if it comes in a bit of an awkward place. The turns that it takes up to that point though, the creative ways the drama is integrated, as well as the strong performances  and fully formed characters highlighted by Almodóvar’s vibrant aesthetic that makes the film pop, keep it engaging and ensure it escapes the kind of messiness that would no doubt occur in such an attempt by a lesser filmmaker.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...