Skip to main content

Macbeth Month: 1957 -Throne of Blood, the Kurosawa One


  “I am in blood
        Stepped in so far that, should I wade no more,
        Returning were as tedious as go o’er.”
                                                            -Act III, scene iv, 136-138

It may be too early to lay the cards out on the table, but I’m going to do it anyway: Throne of Blood is the best Macbeth adaptation. I know it’s Kurosawa, which makes it a pretty cliché choice for a film buff, but you know, Kurosawa’s got his reputation for a reason and Throne of Blood is just so strong a translation that proves tenfold the universality of Shakespeare. It is the best directed version of Macbeth and I’d venture to argue one of the best performed, despite it’s lack of household name thespians. It does though owe something to the previous version discussed, as Kurosawa had wanted to do a Macbeth adaptation around the time of Rashomon, but decided to put it off several years due to the proximity of Welles’ film. He probably respected the guy too much to show him up that soon.
That’s probably unfair, but I do think as far as doing something different with the material of the play, Kurosawa does outshine Welles in both style and initiative. Feudal Japan is a pretty good analogue for feudal Scotland, similar in a lot of ways, but also very different. The one and only Toshiro Mifune is of course the Macbeth of the piece, Washizu, a samurai general in the army of Lord Tsuzuki. There are no witches here but rather a mysterious white spirit with a spinning wheel, a character out of Japanese folklore who foretells the critical prophecy. It is not a dagger but a spear with which Washizu kills his lord, and Washizu himself is killed by his own archers turning on him rather than Takashi Shimura’s much reduced Macduff approximation. It changes the message of the play slightly to factor in more the people Macbeth rules over as instruments in his fate. A greater emphasis is also placed on the importance of an heir –Washizu’s Lady Asaji (Isuzu Yamada) even gives birth to a stillborn child to cement the fleeting power of Washizu’s dynasty. Her own death is never brought up, she is left simply in the throes of madness.
But she arguably plays a stronger role here in manipulating her husband. It’s not very subtle how quick she is to pressure him to act on the prediction, and yet Yamada’s performance is carefully restrained. She exudes a great quiet influence over Washizu, wrapping him around her finger as befits the best Lady Macbeths. And Kurosawa and Mifune do an excellent job translating the evolution of Washizu’s ambition for power, where he isn’t terribly interested to start –needs that coaxing from his wife- to having fully embraced that newfound authority out of fear and greed, and is desperate to hold onto it until the last. In tandem with this, Mifune’s make-up, which like for everyone in the film is based on the expressive conventions of Noh theatre, gets gradually more extreme, pronounced and ugly as the film goes on, an extraordinary reflection of his darkening soul.
Throne of Blood is a big film, shot on the slopes of Mount Fuji and with tons of extras. It’s a grim, barren environment that feels highly isolated from the rest of the world. Who would even want to lord over it, you might ask. The smoke and ever-present fog, a Kurosawa staple, lends considerable mood, as does the spooky Noh music and deep bass choirs of dread that open and close the film -seeming to emanate from nature itself. Kurosawa doesn’t use any of Shakespeare’s actual language obviously, but he does translate the ethos of the play extraordinarily well, and the sense of the dreary inevitable better than anyone. He approaches this movie with the supernatural in mind first -the spiritual element as a driving force and overhanging influence. His prophecy scene is one of the most compelling in the film, that pale whiteness encompassing the spirit giving off a more ancient supernatural presence than is usually felt with the witches of the play otherwise. And then there’s that famous shot of the treetops blowing in the wind partially concealed by the fog. We know what it really is, but it is foreboding nonetheless, and carries with it the certainty of defeat. All of these, Kurosawa illustrates with the utmost command of his craft, and it’s no wonder Throne of Blood was a direct inspiration for the next Macbeth adaptation we’ll be discussing.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more