Skip to main content

Kristen Stewart Performs Astonishingly in Dynamic New Diana Movie


“A fable based on a real tragedy” is how Pablo Larraín’s Spencer introduces itself amid a pale English countryside shot in diluted colours to better convey its’ setting of the early 1990s -a technique it will continue to keep up for the duration of the film. It casts a kind of a sheen over the movie that resembles in some way the colour quality of 90s videotape, but also evokes a sense of dreamlike fancy -as though it were a distant memory or unclear history. Diana Spencer (Kristen Stewart) often considers herself against the judgment of history and the legacy of the British royal family. She wonders what will be made of her, the scandal that always seems to surround her, after she’s gone. One can only speculate what the real Princess of Wales might have thought about the possibility of evaluations such as this one.
Spencer feels like a conscious spiritual sequel to Larraín’s 2016 Jackie, about the life and mental state of Jackie Kennedy in the immediate aftermath of the assassination of her husband. Spencer is similarly set over a brief window: Christmas weekend at Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, just across from where Diana grew up, in 1991 -the height of public scrutiny into her marriage with Prince Charles (Jack Farthing) and his affairs. The film immediately emphasizes the pressure placed on her during this time, as staff await her belated arrival with extreme judgement. Her choice to drive her own car and her confusion en route is contrasted against the preparation being made in the kitchens of Sandringham, ornate and immaculate desserts that symbolize the air of perfection expected of Royals. And which she quite clearly cannot live up to. Just before arriving, she spontaneously decides to cross a field over her old family property to retrieve a coat on a scarecrow that once belonged to her father, to the bafflement of the head chef (Sean Harris) who has come to retrieve her. It’s both an image of affable subversion in her stately role and a sign of her unhealthy mental state, which will continue to be tried through the weekend.
Once at Sandringham, Larraín’s atmosphere becomes noticeably more claustrophobic, long regal hallways giving way to more undisturbed regalia that could pass for a stately British version of the Overlook; and the camera often close-in on Diana navigating this environment with discomfort and even a slight distaste. She is a prisoner in this world and has virtually no agency of her own –her every decision made for her by the acolytes of the Royal institution, represented most starkly in a composite character Major Gregory, played tremendously by Timothy Spall. Larraín makes you keenly feel this restraint and the effect it has on Diana’s psyche through deliberate employment of disorienting cinematography, cacophonous music, and of course honing in on the nuances in Stewart’s performance, which is certainly one of her best.
It may well be the apex of Stewart’s career journey, after so long in the shadow of Twilight. This is a role which she doesn’t only play well, but “disappears” into, as is the common credit. Aided by that film grain and costumes that are recognizable Diana staples, she transforms into the Princess of Wales in both appearance and expression -it’s remarkable! She boasts one of the better English accents attempted by an American in recent years as well, and proves more than capable of conveying the sheer strain and mental anguish Diana was no doubt under during this time. And her scenes with the young Princes William and Harry (she of course sees Charles very little) are adorable. It’s one of the most impressive performances of the year, and one of the most satisfying –in that it will break the minds of so many of those who still deny or underwrite Stewart’s talents due to those vampire movies when she wins an Oscar. There’s no doubt anymore she’s one of the most compelling actresses of her generation.
And it’s clear that she relates to Diana –in fact some have already noted the parallels in their stories, particularly in how they’ve been perceived by the public. At one point Diana notes to Charles the double standard in how the paparazzi seem way more focused on her when it comes to exploiting the cracks in their marriage. She is demonized, ostracized in the press, while he gets comparatively little attention. Yet she’s constantly challenging them and her Sandringham caretakers, insisting on having her curtains open and going for an evening stroll on the grounds. It paints a picture of a Diana in revolt of the Royal Family, disinterested anymore in her marriage and possibly willing to sabotage the Crown itself. But then, Larraín keeps the clarity of this ambiguous to his audience, couching her more dramatic actions and experiences in surreal, distressing reveries that are some of the films’ most affecting moments. The careful planting of a book on Anne Boleyn causes her to see the mirror in hers and Annes’ stories, to the point she has visions of the sixteenth century Queen. In one harrowing hallucination she imagines herself eating the pearls of a necklace that Charles had gifted her -the same necklace he’d gifted Camilla. The effect of such sequences isn’t so much that they blur Diana’s reality, but they provide a window into the recesses of her conscious. We experience the paranoia that her favourite dresser and sole confidant Maggie (Sally Hawkins) is spreading rumours, the immense insecurity in her place within the Royal Family, and the depression that her life must be this  soulless. By the time she genuinely puts herself in danger in the films’ climax, you’re in complete understanding of why.
Yet there’s a sweet optimism to the ending, in spite of all we know both presented in this movie and the history that hangs over it, one that shows Diana in her best light -and of course it’s away from the royal system and with only the love of the people that matter. “All I Need is a Miracle”, she sings, and Larraín would have you believe she could get one. Spencer comes at a pertinent time of royal interest, where one of the biggest TV shows around is built on re-examining their legacy, the Windsor family is showing signs of dissolution, and the institution of the Crown itself is less popular than ever. There is a Prince enshrouded in scandal and a Duchess who has inherited her mother-in-law’s role as the new family scapegoat; to the point she and her Prince have severed certain ties -even royals don’t so much care for royalty anymore. Spencer knows it is entering into a larger, possibly contentious conversation, and it’s certainly not unbiased in doing so. But while it may posit and speculate in its’ portrait of the late Miss Spencer, its’ truths are stark and bleak. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...