Skip to main content

A Stumbling but Intent, Moving Story of Adoption and Deportation



       The premise of Blue Bayou stirred my curiosity quite raptly. I know people who were overseas adoptees, raised in Canada among white people with anglicized names and values, and I’ve wondered about the ways in which their everyday life is effected by that, and exactly what their relationship is to their country of birth. However I’ve never had to think about the possibility of them being deported, which as Blue Bayou illustrates is a genuine risk in the United States. You can live all your life there, but still there’s a chance that because of major oversights in immigration law, you can be sent back to a country you’ve never been to and don’t even speak the language of.
       Justin Chon based his film (which he wrote, directed, produced, and starred in) on accounts of people he grew up with and cases he’d heard of -which has sparked something of a legal battle over intellectual rights and possible plagiarizing in this movies’ content. Nevertheless, it’s a sad situation, legally adopted adults being deported, that happens all too frequently -especially with the recent crackdowns by ICE. Blue Bayou however tries not to be a political movie -which it of course fails at, immigration status being one of the most politicized topics in American discourse. As much as he can though, Chon endeavours to make it a very human story.
       There are a series of other factors working against Chon’s Antonio LeBlanc though, a New Orleans tattoo artist with a tenuous job and a criminal record who grew up in the abusive foster care system, and is only now starting to make a real life for himself with his expectant wife Kathy (Alicia Vikander) and step-daughter Jessie (Sydney Kowalske). When the deportation order comes in, he’s not in a good place to defend himself. Chon illustrates with apt frustration the hardship of the myriad circumstances Antonio is up against, even while those circumstances are all rather blunt. Certainly elements of his story, particular scenes, have the sting of sensationalism, and Chon ultimately finds himself entertaining more than a few contrivances in Antonio’s choices and the effect of the world around him. His screenplay, and his dialogue notably, can get lazy -especially where it concerns antagonists, the most significant being a pair of police officers, one being Jessie’s absent biological father (Mark O’Brien), and the other a one-note angry racist caricature (Emory Cohen). By contrast, the one ICE agent who does appear in the film is actually a friend and regular customer of Antonio’s -an attempt perhaps at a balanced image of ICE that doesn’t fit with the intents of the film. Any time Chon makes to adopt an air of political neutrality like this, it backfires and risks delineating the point he’s trying to make. This story and its’ tragic immediacy doesn’t have space for nuance.
       Chon’s clearer skills as a filmmaker lie outside of narrative though, and with tone more than theme. Wistful naturalist imagery breaks up scenes of emotional strife, little glimpses of the things that Antonio cherishes in his private creek or neglected neighbourhood. He shoots New Orleans with care, not sugar-coating any of its’ dismal avenues but keeping the roads in and out meditative, the riverboats on the bayou at night gorgeous. An excellent emphasis on how entrenched Antonio is in this place, where he belongs more than he ever would in the Korea he never knew. His one reflection to that, Chon nicely illuminates in sporadic dreamlike illusions before revealing their truth, and an even further trauma to Antonio’s history.
       As Antonio deals with these repressions coming back to the surface in tandem with the uphill battle to make a case for himself as a valued member of society -his choices and secrets in light of this driving a wedge between him and the family he’s desperate to stay for- a story is paired alongside this of a Vietnamese-American Parker (Linh Dan Pham), a war-era refugee with terminal cancer. It is by a stretch Chon’s most interesting detour, as the friendship Antonio develops with Parker both opens him up to the Asian cultural experience he never had, and creates a healthy point of reference and empathy that he can’t find elsewhere. Pham is also just really good in the role, caring and kind, wise and contented -the kind of infectious spirit that really could alter your perspective. She also acts as a good contrast for what Antonio could have had had his childhood turned out differently.
       Chon plays well that sombre understanding, as his whole past is made to come back and determine his future. It’s quite a good performance, as Chon digs deep into Antonio’s emotions and desperation. He goes all in on the Louisiana accent and personal style too, making it as abundantly clear as possible how far from Korea this man is. And while he illustrates the worse impulses of Antonio’s nature, how that criminal history is within arms’ reach when vulnerable enough, he does a fine job showing the family man, how tender and close his relationship is to Kathy and Jessie. What makes the family dynamic at the centre of this movie so effectively moving though is the chemistry of all three. Vikander is a touch awkward in moments with her less convincing accent, but really brings considerable weight to the most devastating scenes -especially in one breakdown outside the hospital where she works near the end. Between this and The Green Knight it’s wonderful having Vikander back delivering knockout performances on the regular again. For her part, the young Kowalske just needed to be adorable -which she is, but is also ultimately the crux of a couple high moments of melodrama, relating them with exceptional authenticity.
       These generally occur in the movies’ closing scenes, which certainly push the limits of sentimental posturing, but are effective nonetheless through a committed believability. Because Blue Bayou doesn’t take the easy route, Chon knows where the story must go to achieve its’ purpose, an audaciousness I admire. It’s a bit of a clumsy road getting there, Blue Bayou bears the marks of a filmmaker still learning his craft (particularly where the script and plotting are concerned) -but the heart and conviction is on full display. The postscripts include a series of examples of real adoptees who either have been deported or are in the process of deportation to hammer home just how common this tragedy is. Chon genuinely wants to raise awareness, and film is as good a way as any to do that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...