Skip to main content

Bring Home the Bacon: A Portland Odyssey


Nicolas Cage is no longer the joke he once was. Some might not believe this statement because he does still seem to choose niche projects with very strange creatives that allow him to play to a certain bigness such as Mandy and Color Out of  Space. But he’s not the same Cage we had endless fun with in Face/Off, Snake Eyes, The Wicker Man, or Ghost Rider -and indeed that wasn’t the same Cage of Moonstruck, Raising Arizona, or Leaving Las Vegas. The truth is that he’s an actor with a lot more range than he gets credit for, and yet he’s been defined by eras of his career that have tended to hone in on one aspect -the most popular being the over-the-top expressionistic performance style prominent through his late 90s/2000s work that has made him a meme (and yet this era also saw him give his best performance in Adaptation that has sadly been forgotten amidst all the jokes about the bees). He’s had fun with it alongside us, and perhaps that is part of what has turned his popularity around, the irony with which people have loved his performances becoming more sincere as he’s become savvy to the joke. And in step with that he’s been pushing further in recent years, making some of the most interesting choices of his career.
Pig is a movie that seems pretty goofy on its’ head. Its’ plot, wherein a hermetic truffle forager in the backwoods of Oregon goes to extreme lengths to find his beloved pig that has been kidnapped, presumably enacting vengeance on those who stole her as well, reads like a parody of John Wick. Cage’s appearance in the movie, his face covered in a thick unkempt beard and dressed in dirty pale clothes -the archetypal mountain man (he also has a big gash of dried blood down his face for much of it), only makes it seem more amusing. And he’s extremely stoic, far too serious, and doesn’t understand a lot of social cues, simply repeating that he wants his pig back. We can’t be expected to take this seriously, can we?
The thing is though, that debut writer-director Michael Sarnoski wants us to, at least on some level. He lampshades on a few occasions the ridiculousness of this plot, but otherwise plays it straight, and gradually it starts to work. Pig isn’t really about the pig as it happens, or even the need to get her back, it’s about one mans’ tragedy and disillusionment -and his consequent loneliness.
Cage’s hut-dwelling Rob is actually Robin Feld, formerly a renowned chef in Portland, where he still has all the influence of a feared and respected mob boss, able to get into places and call in favours on the power of his name alone. What drove him to a reclusive lifestyle in the woods was the death of his wife, whom he still grieves through listening to mixtapes she had made him. These reveals, though not grandiose, have a subversiveness to them, particularly those concerning his former career -often replacing what might be an action beat in a film adhering more closely to the John Wick idea. But Rob gets the information he needs not by beating people up (on the contrary he himself takes quite a beating just for a clue), but through calculated contacts and a kind of enigmatic intimidation. In one of the best scenes of the film he reunites with a former pasta chef from his restaurant, whom he’d fired for overcooking, now running his own high-end place in downtown Portland; Rob spends the duration of their conversation quietly criticizing Derrick (David Knell) for opening a generic contemporary business rather than the English pub he’d been so passionate about during their time working together. This reminder of the compromise of his ambition breaks the poor chef’s spirit, and it gets Rob exactly what he wants.
Through this jaunt into bizarre avenues, Rob is accompanied by his regular seller Amir (Alex Wolff), whom he’s roped into this mission on the basis that the pig is essential to Rob’s truffle hunting. They make for a fine odd couple along the way as Amir, initially reluctant and frustrated, comes to learn more about Rob’s identity and his connection to the happiest moment of his parents’ marriage -his father (Adam Arkin) being a much more successful supplier, who it’s implied drove Amir’s mother to a suicide attempt. This trauma hanging around him serves as a great emotional link between him and Rob, and in a soft way, they become real friends over this journey. It’s wonderful, and Cage and Wolff are terrific together, the latter giving the best performance I’ve seen from him.
Cage himself, more dour than he’s usually seen, is nothing short of exemplary. That solemnity cuts to the heart, the weight of his tragedy vivid in his permanent graveness, as is his apathy. Because another notion of loss that this film reckons with is personal-professional integrity, most heavily in that aforementioned scene with Derrick. But all these other hints are dropped that the world in which Rob found his place as a chef is vanishing, and that that contributed to his reclusiveness and just general lack of care. His circles still exist, but they’ve changed and he’s not comfortable in them. A visit to his old baker is depressing, the dreary interior shot from a high angle to emphasize its’ shabbiness, has likely not seen  significant business in years -they too have not acquiesced to new models and aesthetics, and have paid a price. It’s not so much a judgement though as it is simply something else Rob struggles to eulogize. He still cherishes that old world where personal creativity and passion drove his career, his old life where he was happy and successful; he recognizes the fleeting magic in it and the freedom it gave him. But he doesn’t know how to move on.
The one other thing he cherishes is that pig, and if you follow the emotional beats of the film properly, you know there’s only one way his journey can end. It’s beautiful, and once more graciously subversive, its’ tension being of a very different sort than you would imagine. The movie does not deliver what its’ set-up seemingly promises, and it would be a worse movie if it had. Pig uses a missing pig and a somewhat amusing obsession with rescuing her as a means of dissecting a broken man and his broken world -and yet not so broken that either is beyond relief. It’s fascinating and poetic, and I think I’d like to see it again. The film closes on Rob back in his comfortable solitude falling asleep to a recording of his late wife singing Springsteen’s “I’m on Fire”, a moody note to end on, but with a spark of sweetness that sets you at ease. Eventually Rob will be okay, with or without his emotional support pig.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more