Skip to main content

Breaking the Silence


A Quiet Place is not a movie that needed a denser mythology. The 2018 horror film from John Krasinski had a clever and a simple enough premise that really didn’t require any further elaboration. And the movie ended on that strong note of hope that’s a good catharsis for an apocalyptic story. The origin of those highly sound-sensitive monsters and what’s become of other people were curios, but not much more -and the job of the sequel seems to be clearly to make them such. It certainly can’t rely on premise originality anymore or the mystique of the creatures, not defined in their full proportions until the end of that first movie. It needs some other source of creative momentum.
I’m not sure that A Quiet Place Part II ever finds that, but it does make do alright as it provides more context and charts a narrative direction that will presumably spill over into the rest of this now apparent trilogy. It comes at the cost of that first films’ more appealing minimalism: the long stretches without spoken dialogue and the family not even having an identity beyond their middle American nuclear quintessence. But the exchange is some slightly more interesting character development and world-building, even though in this the movie is also deprived of some of its’ more effective horror.
That being said, the films’ opening sequence, an extended flashback that depicts the start of this alien invasion and reintroduces the Abbott family, is pretty good. It’s paced quite well and expands on the original films’ periphery of focus, showcasing these creatures terrorizing a populace. It does well in illustrating the sheer suddenness of this horror too -the pandemonium comes very fast: a small town baseball game one moment gives way to an alien slaughter within minutes. And of course this part of the film allowed Krasinski (whose character died in the first movie) to reprise his role for a short time. However this sequence does hold back on some levels: rarely is more than one creature on-screen at a time -minimizing the impact of the terror, the set-pieces aren’t particularly inventive, and centering it entirely on the family’s point of view does limit the scope of this episode.
Krasinski’s a decent filmmaker, but he isn’t a terribly dynamic one, and it shows in a lot of his repeat choices in how he constructs his scares. Each jump scare point is fairly obvious by that momentarily relaxed tension and muting of noise; the better horror beats are the ones that build on a situation, such as Marcus (Noah Jupe) being trapped in a space with his infant sister running out of oxygen while being monitored by  one of the creatures. Another good example is a sequence at a marina, that draws out enough of a different kind of horror without revolving around the creatures.
Still, you could make the argument this movie is much more action or drama than horror, especially now that at least one of these humans has a weapon against their adversaries. And on that note, Millicent Simmonds is once again the stand-out star of the film. Krasinski clearly paid attention to the reception the young real-life deaf actress received on that first movie, because now her character Regan has been shifted fully into the protagonist role -taking it upon herself to go off in search of more human survivors. Simmonds rises to the challenge very well, her storyline by a healthy margin the more compelling part of the movie. It’s here where the story feels to be expanding into new territory and is amplified by the addition of Cillian Murphy as the new adult lead Emmett –revealed through the flashback to be an old family friend of the Abbotts, now descended into despair. As the ersatz-father figure, he is an improvement on Krasinski in the first film, largely because Murphy is just a much better actor, but also because Emmett’s perspective is a more interesting one to follow than that of the Abbotts –he’s more lost, more desperate, more morally beaten down, and more traumatized, but also more resourceful. He and Regan make for a pretty good pair as they rub off on one another and grow through their journey to possible salvation.
By contrast, the storyline focused on Marcus and Evelyn (Emily Blunt), confined to a shelter in the empty steel foundry where they found Emmett is far less dramatically fulfilling. The former is given something of an arc, first suffering a severe injury and then learning to confront one of the creatures (all the while Krasinski hoping you won’t notice he’s clearly gone through puberty since the movie this one is meant to immediately follow). But for being the top billed star and wife of the director, Blunt has relatively little to do in this film but react to the creatures or the choices of her children. She gets a couple standout moments but otherwise feels entirely underutilized as not even the anchor character of the story thread she’s attached to.
The relationship of those story threads is a bit difficult too, as they progress at vastly different paces, but are united by parallel bouts of suspense or action. It’s quite a practical method of editing, but too often shows the fault lines in the disparity of momentum between the two. Marcus’ plight will give way to Regan’s, and then the film will follow a stretch of her story before returning to him in essentially the same situation. And the big moments of each storyline cut against each other too frequently. It seems like Krasinski came upon a structural device for his ending that he liked, but decided to use it elsewhere in the film as well to the detriment of that culminating moment.
And when I say things like “ending” and “culminating”, I mean them only in a literal sense, because this movie is not finished. A Quiet Place Part II is missing its’ third act, concluding at a decisive moment, but ahead of any of the narratives wrapping up and leaving the film on a cliffhanger. I don’t know that I’ve seen a movie made deliberately incomplete like this since Alita: Battle Angel -though unlike that film this one’s much more likely to get its’ sequel. The film is already short at just over an hour and a half, and the abruptness of its’ ending makes the lack of resolution all the more palpable. It’s a bold choice, even if I don’t know that Krasinski pulls it off all that well.
One thing’s sure though is that he is committed to this franchise, however bizarre of a franchise it may be -he’s working on a spin-off in addition to a third movie, which might just match Zack Snyder’s bewildering commitment to the universe of his Army of the Dead in terms of overzealous dedication to a mediocre idea. But I’ll give it to Krasinski, he got a second decent movie out of it -even if I don’t think it’s as interesting as the first. I’m willing to see where it goes from here.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day