Skip to main content

We Broke Up: A Relationship Movie that Doesn't Know What it Wants

     

        William Jackson Harper was ready for a leading movie role like this. So was Aya Cash I assume -I haven’t seen The Boys but I know she’s been one of its’ breakout stars. Harper absolutely was on The Good Place, the last season of which really demonstrated why, complimenting his unique comic sensibility with a shift into romantic leading man material that no doubt predicated his casting in this movie. And that kind of subject matter really seems to lend itself well to Cash’s talents too. Both Harper and Cash richly deserve spotlighting, and in fact I would like to see them utilized in romantic comedy again. Because their first round didn’t take.
        We Broke Up is a lame movie by almost every measure. In its’ script and structure down to the filming itself, it reads as exceptionally cheap and unambitious. Written and directed by Jeff Rosenberg, a TV veteran of sitcoms, it unsurprisingly is built around a very sitcom-welcome premise. A long-term couple breaks up just ahead of an important social obligation where they have to pretend they’re still together. This premise itself is what drives the story, with sights set on a few developments and a particular end goal, but not much consideration or interest in the context or characters. The film opens on the break-up between Lori (Cash) and Doug (Harper) out of a marriage proposal that backfires, and it doesn’t waste much time then establishing the necessity for them to put on a ruse for the wedding of Lori’s sister Bea (Sarah Bolger) a few days later. All this without the film ever adequately setting up a sense of their relationship.
        That’s not strictly necessary of course for a sitcom episode or even a particular kind of comedy movie. But We Broke Up doesn’t work as either. While the setup would forecast hijinks or an extravagant comic tone, the movie doesn’t follow through. The jokes are grounded and rather muted, the comic situations don’t amount to much, and it never even plays up the obvious farcical elements such as the potential of Doug making out with another woman to be spotted by Bea. He’s spotted by Lori instead for drama. The film almost never fails to take the wind out of a comedic moment, or substitute more promising concepts for material that is just unfunny, namely the bizarre set-up of a wedding at a summer camp, complete with camp-themed activities, and an indulgence in the irritable excitability of Bea or half-baked doofus stoner jokes around her fiance Jayson (Tony Cavalero). Mostly though, the movie is not funny because it doesn’t know what level it wants to pitch the comedy at -and seems to not particularly care either. There are a handful of “big jokes” but they are never quite as big as they should be for their full effect; a good example being a pool chicken fight between Lori and Doug that is building to a breaking point for Lori, only for it culminate in an underwhelming little shove that nonetheless lands Doug in the water. And it utterly fails to get a reaction.
        I don’t know how much of this floundering comedy filmmaking is just incompetence, but to some degree it feels intentional, because the tonal focus is more concentrated in the drama of the break-up and the painful awkwardness of the situation more than the levity of it. An attempt at a more honest approach to this kind of story, in line with a lot of American indie comedy these days. And yet this film never does the work to earn that either. It wants you to feel for Lori and Doug, and Cash and Harper do their damnedest -and not to entirely ill effect. They both get a handful of good moments where you’re tempted to really care about them. But sadly, the script just isn’t willing to get to know them, and what it does reveal, due to the needs of the plot, doesn’t cast them in a good light. Despite the longevity of their relationship (ten years) it would seem they don’t actually know each other very well, particularly with regards to their plans for the future. Never once it appears have they discussed what they want out of life. And Doug in particular is a stubborn prick -unwilling to have a conversation about the subject of marriage and children if its’ not going to go his way. There is an easy compromise available that is never taken or even entertained. But of course the reason the movie avoids having that kind of discussion and paints Doug so broadly is because the script is fundamentally lazy, and can’t progress the characters’ points beyond one simple difference between them. It especially does Lori a disservice, never letting her articulate what she really wants. One of the other things the script is trying to do is play against cliché and take the story in a more respectable, bittersweet direction. Yet it still plays around with the convention as a red herring -a whole sequence of the film that is blatantly pointless and actually does more harm to its final resolution by backtracking on the emotional investment these two have in each other.
        On top of all this the movie is just blandly made. I wouldn’t be surprised if the script was written around the location they got for the filming to cut costs. The scenes that are meant to be funny are often not shot to those purposes making them even more awkward to watch. The movie can’t even utilize Eduardo Franco (of Booksmart and American Vandal) right, to say nothing of the wasted talents of Bolger and even Peri Gilpin as the girls’ mother.
        We Broke Up really could have been something if it either had just genuine curiosity in exploring a failed relationship in a compelling and nuanced way or if it had gone for broke and had fun with the premise without the need for emotional stakes attached to the characters. It’s failure was in not committing either way and trying to excuse a lack of thoughtfulness and effort by a seemingly mature storytelling choice in the end. But even a satisfying break-up needs to be earned. 

Comments

  1. if you're interested to see Cash really shine, I would suggest checking out You're The Worst. An FX Dark romantic comedy that she is just brilliant it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day