Skip to main content

Let Them Fight!


Sometimes it’s enough to watch a giant ape punch a giant lizard.
I’ve been lukewarm on Warner Brothers’ and Legendary Pictures’ “MonsterVerse” cinematic universe. Though each of the movies its’ produced have been generally fun and featured scenes and elements that I’ve liked, none of them have been anything great, certainly not next to the best iterations of the Godzilla and King Kong IPs. And most of what has held those other movies back is also present in Godzilla vs. Kong, the big crossover that they’ve been building to since at least Kong: Skull Island in 2017: poor writing, dull human characters, dull human storylines between the action that sometimes feels scant. It’s a pattern that persists even with routine changes in directors and casts. This time though I wasn’t bothered so much by that. Could it be I’ve lost my cynicism and just accepted the flaws in conjunction with the stuff that actually works, or could it be the movie is genuinely better? Maybe it’s a bit of both.
It’s certainly better than Godzilla: King of the Monsters, what with its’ endless exposition, convoluted plotting, and poorly thought out themes. The plotting for this movie is a lot more streamlined (even if you can tell where it’s been cut down) and never quite feels divorced from the action. It’s also a lot more openly silly. In stark contrast to the over-serious two Godzilla movies preceding it, this film embraces the fundamentally insane elements of its premise and introduces others that are even more bonkers -we’re talking nineteenth century scientific theory here, Jules Verne-style concepts not even marginally linked to reality. And in addition to the creativity such choices permit, they also give the film more character, which none in this series but Kong: Skull Island were ever able to do before.
Kong is given a bit of depth in this movie, not on the level of something like the Peter Jackson film, but he’s more than just a giant ape monster fighting other monsters this time around. There’s an attempt at least to reconcile him with the classic, sympathetic idea of King Kong. Because he’s got a vessel of a communication in a little deaf girl (Kaylee Hottle), we’re privy to some of his emotions, such as fear, loneliness, and a yearning for belonging. He even seems more intelligent in this film, particularly in some of the clever ways he fights. His opponent actually doesn’t appear in the movie much outside of said fights and one opening attack on northern Gulf Coast Florida -perhaps director Adam Wingard felt Godzilla had already been showcased enough in two movies already. There isn’t much more to him in this, though Godzilla has never been strongly defined in the way Kong has. The purpose for his emergent rampage though reveals an intense survival instinct in light of human activity based around a major story element pretty clear to predict but tying once again into human hubris and quite appropriately that same need for supremacy I discussed in my recent Planet of the Apes essay.
This secret component aside though, the monster fights are the bread and butter of this movie. Both of them. And that may sound like shortchanging the audience for a movie titled Godzilla vs. Kong, but even just these two fights are pretty satisfactory. Wingard and his crew really have fun with how they construct the battles, not just in the choreography of the action but the environment and the tone. They ask how these two behemoths would clash in the open water, Kong outside of his natural habitat, Godzilla directly in his. And they come up with a lot of the fun kind of stupid ideas, such as the two monsters hopping from one aircraft carrier to another or giving Kong a Die Hard leap from an explosion. And though these scenes go on for a while they don’t tire, and maintain a consistent inventiveness. There’s a lot of exciting imagery to these sequences too: the frequently marketed Godzilla dorsal fins above water approaching land and/or boat a la Jaws, or just about any shot in the neon-coated Hong Kong brawl in the climax. Although it is a bit disappointing that in spite of assurances there would be a definitive winner of this match-up (unlike so many past crossover “versus” movies), the movie finds a way around actually delivering on that.
These clashes, though great fun, are not the bulk of the movie, most of which is focused on the human characters engineering them and figuring things out. As much as it’s nice to draw a relationship between Kong and humans again, Alexander SkarsgÃ¥rd and Rebecca Hall are exceptionally dull, there to keep the plot moving as they attempt to relocate Kong. Demián Bichir does the standard corporate villain routine, driven by an impulse that might be fascinating if it were allowed to grow -but then I wouldn’t trust these writers or this kind of movie to explore it adequately. The only human storyline that kind of works is an investigation headed by Millie Bobby Browns’ Madison into a conspiracy within Bichirs’ advanced tech company, aided by her plucky friend played by Julian Dennison, and Bryan Tyree Henry’s radio conspiracy theorist. The investigation itself is just as tedious as any other plot beat, but the trio works well off each other and Henry and Dennison provide the only decent comic relief of the film. Kyle Chandler and Lance Reddick make cameo appearances, clearly cut down from larger roles (Zhang Ziyi wasn’t so lucky -she’s been cut out entirely), but it is for the best, and arguably they didn’t even need the screen-time they were given -it already intrudes too much on what audiences actually want to see.
Godzilla and King Kong went at it before -in the 1962 Toho production of King Kong vs. Godzilla, but there is something to seeing them fight each other in the modern special effects context of a scale such as this. It feels like the kind of pure spectacle we don’t get much of anymore, and it’s fitting considering the original King Kong is considered the first of that kind of blockbuster. Its’ descendant here replicates that in its’ visual effects, its’ very strong visual language, if the properties pay for it by losing some of their camp. The human stuff is largely uninteresting, the plotting fairly lacklustre, but for a film that may be for many their first return to the cinema in over a year, that stuff can be forgiven for a couple good old fashioned satisfactory monster fights.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day