Skip to main content

Studio Ghibli Returns with an Uncanny Trial in CG Animation


I was really rooting for Earwig and the Witch. I mean it is the return of Studio Ghibli, their first feature in seven years and the first sign they are looking to a future without Hayao Miyazaki, the studios’ visionary founder and genius director. And I thought that this being a CG-animated movie was an interesting and bold choice. Plus, I just wanted a win for the director, Goro Miyazaki, whose previous films Tales from Earthsea and From Up on Poppy Hill though good are often seen as lesser entries in the companys’ catalogue next to all the classics -and his dad is just real mean to him about his efforts too. It would be a great validation if he successfully brought Studio Ghibli into the CG animation sphere. Sadly, what Earwig and the Witch does instead is tarnish a legacy. In thirty-five years and twenty-one features, many of which rank among the greatest animated films, Studio Ghibli has not made a bad movie… until now.
Earwig and the Witch is the second Ghibli film adapted from a book by Diana Wynne Jones (one of her last) after the hugely successful Howl’s Moving Castle. Structurally, it’s much less complex than that -in fact it’s almost annoyingly simple as it tells the story of an orphan girl, the daughter of a witch, who is adopted by another witch and a warlock to basically be their housekeeper. It has the feel of an old Roald Dahl story crossed with any of the multitudes of anime about young girl witches, excepting of course Ghibli’s own signature entry in that genre. It’s got all the staples: magical mischief, a sassy black talking cat, a timid and nerdy best friend of the opposite sex, a mild coming-of-age narrative, and a last act ellipsis. It wouldn’t be that interesting or original a story on its’ own, salvageable maybe, but by no means dependable. However that is not what sinks this movie.
There is no denying it, the animation is hideous. When it comes to Studio Ghibli’s artistry, it’s usually so uniformly great that the only reason to discuss it is to praise its’ awesomeness, depth, vivacity, or creativity (that’s true of Miyazaki’s past work too, much as his father may say otherwise). Thus why it’s so incredibly disheartening  that on this film it is the animation that is by far the most egregious and fatal component. Every person, object, and bit of texture looks plastic and uniquely lifeless, like bad claymation crossed with a Disney Junior show. Characters move and interact with an unnerving awkwardness and the expressions are shallow at best, uncomfortable at worst. It would have all the signs of a first foray into animation but insultingly there’s competence behind it, which you can see in some of the details and layouts. The animation doesn’t look ugly because the animators don’t know better, but because they’re adapting the form but not the technique of traditional anime.
For as wide-ranging and versatile as anime is, it is beholden to distinctive visual choices and stylistic peculiarities exclusive to the form: certain facial expressions, emotional imagery, heightened character designs, transformative aesthetics based on tone, all things you’d recognize if you’ve seen any anime and perfectly cohesive within that style that facilitates them. But removed from that style, they really don’t work. It’s where most of the nightmare fuel in Earwig and the Witch comes from: big and outrageous expressive choices far too specific or bizarre  to translate organically into a stunted CGI context. Even just the traditional anime eyes look so off-putting. This choice greatly effects the dubbing too. Where the discrepancy between traditional anime lip movement and dialogue (even in the original Japanese) is not bothersome due to the easy adaptability of that lip movement, in a CG framework with a 3D model where the lip movement has to be highly sophisticated, that disparity is much more pronounced and distractedly noticeable. Talented folks like Dan Stevens and Richard E. Grant might as well be talking over the movie for how rarely what they’re saying lines up with the motions their characters’ mouths are making.
As far as that goes I’m glad there’s less singing than the films’ promotional imagery let on. A minor development that the film seems to inordinately want to sell is that the witches are rock stars, which seems like something that ought to be more focused on in lieu of Earwigs’ plots of pettiness against her authoritative new mother –who’s perhaps played with a bit too much villainy to earn the casual attitude the movie gives her relationship to Earwig. Earwig’s real mother is another curious point, and we’re never given a decent explanation as to why she gave her daughter up. It’s one of several little plot points not to have any real purpose, alongside Earwig’s friendship with a dweeby boy tragically named Custard, and the mystery of the warlock Mandrake’s private room. A whole assortment of ideas that are not given their due and would benefit the film greatly with a little expansion. As is, even discounting the animation, there’s almost nothing to latch onto in the story or characters –areas where even the weakest Ghibli films have triumphed.
Honestly, I can envision a version of this movie that works. It operates after all off of a tried and true formula of stories like Matilda and Annie. And I’m sure the source material is worth it. The animation even could be made more tolerable without having to be a hand-drawn aesthetic. But the character of anime doesn’t suit it, and I don’t know that it can be made to. I’m not familiar with the breadth of anime enough to know if there have been successful trials into CG animation –but I know that it’s been attempted enough times that surely there  must be some that have turned out better than this. Experimentation in any art form is good and I wouldn’t deny Studio Ghibli the opportunity to continue trying to work with a CG style. But they need to evolve into it considerably and work out the bugs before it has any chance of matching the extraordinary power of their previous work. Because Earwig and the Witch looks like it was made that way just because it could be. It is not the homecoming we wanted and is unusually careless. Studio Ghibli has ripped off the band-aid, we now know they have the ability to fail as much as any other long-running company. I hope it doesn’t set a precedent.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day