Skip to main content

The Black Sheep of the Family


I’m going to be blunt, I went to see Let Him Go more to support my small local theatre ahead of another potential local lockdown than because I was particularly drawn to the movie itself. It didn’t have a very interesting marketing campaign, the conflict seemed unpromising, and the last movie I saw that partnered Kevin Costner with Diane Lane was Man of Steel -not a great precursor. The film is an adaptation of a Larry Watson novel directed by Thomas Bezucha, whose filmography mostly consists of films I’ve never heard of. It would have been barely on my radar, but for the one thing that did raise my eyebrow from the trailer: Lesley Manville, critical darling who almost never gets the popular credit she deserves, playing the seeming antagonist as a fanciful, homely but generously crass old family matriarch. That at least looked like the kind of performance that would be worth the ticket.
And quite honestly it is. Manville’s dangerous and intimidating turn as Blanche Weboy, a perversion of a classical country mother archetype is the showstopper of the film no question. Though the movie is just generally a good deal better than it looked, if still not terribly interesting or memorable. It is an exercise in turning traditional country values and decorum on its head if nothing else, and that is fascinating; the way it addresses social mores of family, and family joined through marriage most notably. One especially good scene is coloured by a simmering hostility and passive aggression as two families linked through a common grandchild keep up a pretense of respectability when meeting for the first time under disagreeable circumstances. Costner and Lane’s George and Margaret Blackledge have travelled from Montana to the North Dakota home of the Weboys, the family whose son married their daughter-in-law Lorna (Kayli Carter) after the tragic death of their own son, to see their grandchild Jimmy whom the Weboys had discreetly abducted from the Blackledges hometown to raise themselves. Margaret had already witnessed the Weboy son abusing Jimmy and his mother, and so she naturally has a foul opinion of this family that only deepens in the presence of their clearly dishonest cordiality.
This comes at about the midpoint of the film though, after a long first act of buildup in which the Weboys are mostly off-screen phantoms, known only by their family name and the ominousness that comes along with it, and the increasing danger they seem to present to Jimmy. This stuff is all effective too, Bezucha knows well enough how to build his tension and let it seethe, finding some of the sketchiest-looking spots in the American northwest to drop hints of the Weboys’ menace -their influence extends far beyond their homestead. The mood and dread is actually weirdly reminiscent of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre of all things, though nowhere as depraved -a comparison that only becomes more resonant when it comes to the rural isolation of the Weboy home, the implicit violence beneath their mundane exterior, and the fact the Blackledges can’t seem to escape their grip.
But the journey is also the less active section of the film, where it has a tendency to drag and is dominated by protagonists who aren’t the most compelling, only broken up by an episode with Booboo Stewart as a friendly Indigenous teenager escaped from a residential school (a detail that serves little to no function). It doesn’t all feel completely worthwhile. Consequently, the Weboys, and particularly that asshole son Donny (Will Brittain) are underdeveloped in the films’ latter half, and don’t really live up to the shadow they cast. That is of course except for Blanche.
The name is not an accident, there’s definitely an air of Tennessee Williams’ delusional southern belle to this character, which Manville taps into alongside the darker impulses and sinister disposition of a horror villain. She’s the only Weboy afforded a semblance of a backstory, as well as some macabre references to deceased family members, yet the film could maybe have benefited from more allusions to her history and derangement. Though she is foreboding enough without, in her visual likeness to Bette Davis in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane, her arcane rules of discipline, and her unwavering confidence in her protection from consequence.
It’s largely this that rejuvenates the film after some dullness, that inspires real investment in the Blackledges getting Lorna and Jimmy away from Blanches’ clutches. And in the process, I was surprised with some of the directions the story took and Bezucha’s handling of them. Costner’s not great in the film (though I’ve never been much a fan of his acting), but that reserved old working class tough he’s been playing for the last few years actually suits him alright here, and Diane Lane, in many ways playing the flipside of Manville, is perfectly fierce and determined. The only other performance of note is probably Jeffrey Donovan, noteworthy only because he’s in the movie (as another of Blanche’s sons) and is as fittingly creepy as ever.
Even with all this, the movie does fall into frustrating conventions at times and it always feels like it could be going further with its characters and plot, in addition to those pacing issues I mentioned. But one such convention is the climax, which is solidly entertaining and satisfying; and though it too feels a bit restrained (especially compared to the earlier scene it’s a direct response to), it’s thrilling enough to make for a surprisingly strong ending to the story. I was impressed and genuinely surprised by how much better Let Him Go was than I anticipated. It’s not a great movie by any means (though Manville’s performance certainly deserves some acclaim), but it’s a thoroughly adequate neo-western revenge drama, with touches of a great thriller in there too. And unequivocally a fascinating one for those extended families in the States who will be celebrating Thanksgiving in a few weeks.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day