Skip to main content

The Black Sheep of the Family


I’m going to be blunt, I went to see Let Him Go more to support my small local theatre ahead of another potential local lockdown than because I was particularly drawn to the movie itself. It didn’t have a very interesting marketing campaign, the conflict seemed unpromising, and the last movie I saw that partnered Kevin Costner with Diane Lane was Man of Steel -not a great precursor. The film is an adaptation of a Larry Watson novel directed by Thomas Bezucha, whose filmography mostly consists of films I’ve never heard of. It would have been barely on my radar, but for the one thing that did raise my eyebrow from the trailer: Lesley Manville, critical darling who almost never gets the popular credit she deserves, playing the seeming antagonist as a fanciful, homely but generously crass old family matriarch. That at least looked like the kind of performance that would be worth the ticket.
And quite honestly it is. Manville’s dangerous and intimidating turn as Blanche Weboy, a perversion of a classical country mother archetype is the showstopper of the film no question. Though the movie is just generally a good deal better than it looked, if still not terribly interesting or memorable. It is an exercise in turning traditional country values and decorum on its head if nothing else, and that is fascinating; the way it addresses social mores of family, and family joined through marriage most notably. One especially good scene is coloured by a simmering hostility and passive aggression as two families linked through a common grandchild keep up a pretense of respectability when meeting for the first time under disagreeable circumstances. Costner and Lane’s George and Margaret Blackledge have travelled from Montana to the North Dakota home of the Weboys, the family whose son married their daughter-in-law Lorna (Kayli Carter) after the tragic death of their own son, to see their grandchild Jimmy whom the Weboys had discreetly abducted from the Blackledges hometown to raise themselves. Margaret had already witnessed the Weboy son abusing Jimmy and his mother, and so she naturally has a foul opinion of this family that only deepens in the presence of their clearly dishonest cordiality.
This comes at about the midpoint of the film though, after a long first act of buildup in which the Weboys are mostly off-screen phantoms, known only by their family name and the ominousness that comes along with it, and the increasing danger they seem to present to Jimmy. This stuff is all effective too, Bezucha knows well enough how to build his tension and let it seethe, finding some of the sketchiest-looking spots in the American northwest to drop hints of the Weboys’ menace -their influence extends far beyond their homestead. The mood and dread is actually weirdly reminiscent of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre of all things, though nowhere as depraved -a comparison that only becomes more resonant when it comes to the rural isolation of the Weboy home, the implicit violence beneath their mundane exterior, and the fact the Blackledges can’t seem to escape their grip.
But the journey is also the less active section of the film, where it has a tendency to drag and is dominated by protagonists who aren’t the most compelling, only broken up by an episode with Booboo Stewart as a friendly Indigenous teenager escaped from a residential school (a detail that serves little to no function). It doesn’t all feel completely worthwhile. Consequently, the Weboys, and particularly that asshole son Donny (Will Brittain) are underdeveloped in the films’ latter half, and don’t really live up to the shadow they cast. That is of course except for Blanche.
The name is not an accident, there’s definitely an air of Tennessee Williams’ delusional southern belle to this character, which Manville taps into alongside the darker impulses and sinister disposition of a horror villain. She’s the only Weboy afforded a semblance of a backstory, as well as some macabre references to deceased family members, yet the film could maybe have benefited from more allusions to her history and derangement. Though she is foreboding enough without, in her visual likeness to Bette Davis in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane, her arcane rules of discipline, and her unwavering confidence in her protection from consequence.
It’s largely this that rejuvenates the film after some dullness, that inspires real investment in the Blackledges getting Lorna and Jimmy away from Blanches’ clutches. And in the process, I was surprised with some of the directions the story took and Bezucha’s handling of them. Costner’s not great in the film (though I’ve never been much a fan of his acting), but that reserved old working class tough he’s been playing for the last few years actually suits him alright here, and Diane Lane, in many ways playing the flipside of Manville, is perfectly fierce and determined. The only other performance of note is probably Jeffrey Donovan, noteworthy only because he’s in the movie (as another of Blanche’s sons) and is as fittingly creepy as ever.
Even with all this, the movie does fall into frustrating conventions at times and it always feels like it could be going further with its characters and plot, in addition to those pacing issues I mentioned. But one such convention is the climax, which is solidly entertaining and satisfying; and though it too feels a bit restrained (especially compared to the earlier scene it’s a direct response to), it’s thrilling enough to make for a surprisingly strong ending to the story. I was impressed and genuinely surprised by how much better Let Him Go was than I anticipated. It’s not a great movie by any means (though Manville’s performance certainly deserves some acclaim), but it’s a thoroughly adequate neo-western revenge drama, with touches of a great thriller in there too. And unequivocally a fascinating one for those extended families in the States who will be celebrating Thanksgiving in a few weeks.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...