Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Sisters (1973)


I’ve got a few major blind spots in my experience with popular or important movies. One is Preston Sturges, another is Brian De Palma. De Palma was of course one of the consortium of ambitious young filmmakers who took Hollywood by storm in the 1970s, part of the friend group that included Francis Ford Coppola, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, and Martin Scorsese -though I have seen far fewer of his movies than any of theirs (I did however cover Carrie a few years ago). What I know of De Palma is that he was one of the weirder ones of that collective (just look at some of his earliest movies), that he’s particularly known for thrillers, was a favourite of Pauline Kaels’, and is a big Hitchcock fanboy.
And his 1972 thriller Sisters is a pretty clear-cut expression of that Hitchcock fanaticism, a movie that borrows directly from Psycho, Rear Window, Vertigo, and Rope in its story of the investigation into a pair of separated conjoined twins, one of whom is a murderer. De Palma even goes so far as to have Bernard Herrmann compose the score, an excellent one at that, as he mimics Hitchcocks’ suspense techniques and style. It’s a loving homage though, and De Palma uses the relative freedom he has in the 1970s to go a little further than Hitchcock might have. The key murder is more graphic than in Psycho and he’s able to draw much more attention to the theme of voyeurism than Rear Window right off the start through a show about ‘peeping toms’. He incorporates Hitchcockian narrative devices, particularly those of Psycho (a red herring protagonist, changing POV characters, an ambiguous killer seemingly protected by a more innocent family member), but also infuses his own creative touches. The split screen sequence in particular is really good, heightening the tension as you see exactly how the police wasting time allows a crime scene to be hidden.
This movie isn’t very kind to the police and that’s nice, and it actually addresses police racism as well, given how the officers don’t seem to take seriously the murder of a black man. The more powerful theme to the film though is feminist, with Jennifer Salt’s fearless investigative journalist (who witnesses the crime from her neighbouring apartment) frequently suppressed in her professional endeavour to prove the crime. She’s the one who calls the cops out and is the performance highlight of the movie. But there’s also a dark thread of masculine sexual control and abuse that is explored in the relationship between twin Danielle, played by Margot Kidder in a not quite convincing Quebcois accent, and her ex-husband (William Finley). Unlike Psycho, this films’ killer is herself a victim, psychologically traumatized and gaslit by a domineering man.
There are some compelling choices too that hearken back to other influences on De Palma, particularly a film about the twins that resembles the aesthetic of German expressionism, and as such creates a very eerie tone (the problematic side of Sisters is like Psycho, a tendency to otherize an abnormal physical or mental condition, in this case conjoined twins). The climax is especially interesting in revisiting this aesthetic more chaotically, and with a dose of Persona-style duality to the relationship between the two lead women (and throughout the film in general it must be said). It invites a lot of analysis by design, but De Palma doesn’t forget to make it chilling as well.
Sisters is a very conscious Hitchcock homage, but De Palma’s got a lot on his mind independently. He’s very much playing in another filmmakers’ sandbox but is interested in what he can bring to it and it’s fascinating. I’ve got some catching up to do.
 
Criterion Recommendation: Let the Right One In (2008)
Before he was sabotaging his own career with films like The Snowman, Tomas Alfredson came onto the scene with an unusual little vampire movie called Let the Right One In. Based on a Swedish novel, it’s about a boy in Stockholm who befriends a mysterious vampire girl. A really beautiful mix of horror and romance, its’ a film that grapples with themes of anger, desperation, vengeance, and loneliness as it questions while also making you understand the complicated emotional head-space of these children, neither of whom are very happy with their lot in life. There are subtexts relating to violence, abuse, and even gender identity. The film is exceptionally written and surprisingly sweet, owing a lot to the magnificent performance from the young Lina Leandersson. Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography is captivating in its lush melancholy, and the music by Johan Söderqvist is sensational. There really aren’t enough vampire movies in the Criterion Collection, and this might be the best of the last couple decades.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...