Skip to main content

A Dull Picture of an Important Farmer


Percy is the second underwhelming Canadian movie I saw in a single weekend. Of course it might be generous to call the movie Canadian. It’s an international co-production starring largely American actors and from a director who’s mostly worked in American T.V. The fact that a lot of it is set in Bruno, Saskatchewan is incidental -especially because it was actually shot in Manitoba due to the government of Saskatchewan hating art (vote by October 26th!). Whatever else I thought of The Curse of Audrey Earnshaw, it did at least feel Canadian. Though a part of that was its’ cheapness, which is certainly not the case for Percy, backed up by almost a dozen production companies to ensure a quality relative to its lead star Christopher Walken. Obviously, this annoys me and speaks to a lot of heavier problems in funding in the Canadian film industry. Percy is only better than The Curse of Audrey Earnshaw because it was given the resources to be.
The film is based on a true story, and the particular kind of supreme underdog story that movies historically love. Percy Schmeiser, who passed away just this week, was an elderly canola farmer in Bruno who really did challenge Monsanto, first over a contamination dispute and then on behalf of farmers everywhere over the corporations’ exploitation of them and their crops. Percy illustrates the escalating series of legal battles in a conventional way, where Schmeiser, his wife Louise (Roberta Maxwell), and their single small-time lawyer (Zach Braff) seem to be on their own in taking on the imposing legal teams of Monsanto, always fronted by Martin Donovan. Of course, the couple become ostracized by their tight-knit community over this and the insinuation that Schmeiser stole Monsanto seed from his fellow farmers. And at the same time, a manipulative American environmental activist (Christina Ricci) latches onto this fight in the hopes of bolstering a movement against the conglomerate with Schmeiser as its’ face.
None of this is played particularly poorly, aside from its’ being derivative; the uphill battle for Percy is more about whether it can make the politics around farming interesting. Because as a subject, farming is incredibly boring for most people (there’s a reason why it is the profession so many heroes answer the call of adventure to escape), and this is a movie with a protagonist who’s so embedded in and proud of the work, frequently bringing up the family history in farming going back centuries, believing in an inherent nobility to it -often as a means of shaming his son who left the family business. But for as rotten a picture of Monsanto as this movie paints, using every cliché of big business in its toolbox (of which I’m sure the corporation really lives up to), I still can’t bring myself to care all that much about the sanctity of farming or why it particularly matters where seeds come from.
Of course on the latter point, Schmeiser doesn’t either, and you do get the sense of the freedom of these farmers being trodden on due to the flimsy nature of Monsanto’s copyrighted gene. The best part of the film is when Schmeiser visits India for a conference and we get a broader sense of the issue. It also allows for the film to give Schmeiser some allies that don’t seem to exist in Saskatchewan, where his only friend in the matter is an utterly wasted(yet again) Adam Beach. However the film is still weighed down by its’ inability to really explore its story in new ways and its tendency to rely on bland plot contrivances -such as the lawyer being frustrated by a string of lost cases he would have much rather just settled suddenly being won over by a comedic gesture for the big Supreme Court hearing. The movie is filled with little moments like that that are almost insultingly artificial.
And it just furthers how condescendingly Hollywood this Canadian story is presented as, even if it was produced far outside of the Hollywood system. Christopher Walken is fine as Percy, and it is nice to see the guy notorious for taking any role offered him actually playing a part seriously. But he’s not so good that a Donald Sutherland or Gordon Pinsent or Victor Garber couldn’t have played the part over him. In fact Walkens’ distinct New York accent gives him away immediately as someone not born and raised in Saskatchewan. Braff, who’s never been more than okay in any movie he’s appeared in, could also have easily been swapped out for a Canadian actor. But of course, authenticity is not the goal here when the reason for these castings was so clearly star power to attract audiences. But it does hurt the films’ effect, especially as some Canadian actors are swiftly gaining star power in their own right both abroad and here at home. Look at the popularity of Schitt’s Creek or that Canadian sitcom actor who’s going to be headlining a Marvel movie. As for director Clark Johnson, who did grow up in Canada and who’s best received work includes a few episodes of The Wire and the Alfre Woodard Netflix movie Juanita, his approach is rather workmanlike. It’s very competent, not at all drawing attention to itself, but far too ordinary.
I would say there’s a lack of ambition on display in Percy, but the story doesn’t seem to warrant much of it to begin with. However even I feel it could have been a little more engrossing and resonated more honestly with the kind of people it is apparently about. I’d like to see less Canadian movies wearing the masks of American movies and being themselves, even as that method has occasionally yielded good results. And Percy has about as Canadian a story as you can get.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...