Skip to main content

Charlie Kaufman’s Hypnotic Thriller Unravels Reality and Consciousness

 “I’m thinking of ending things.”
This eponymous line comes up a lot in Charlie Kaufmans’ adaptation of the novel by Iain Reid. The inner monologue of Jessie Buckley’s character, referred to by a number of names (often a variation on ‘Lucy’) none of which seem true, keeps coming back to it as she debates the pros and cons of her seven-week relationship with Jesse Plemons’ Jake. She’s meeting his parents for the first time, out on a remote farm in the middle of winter. Their relationship is full of awkward body language and stale conversation, intimations of a personal connection but nothing substantive. It’s a long drive and a long evening after that -she has plenty of occasions to broach the subject both mentally and vocally, but she can never quite follow through. She really can’t end things.
This movie is only Kaufmans’ third time in the directors’ chair, but he has built up over two decades a distinct cinematic voice through the movies he’s written, most notably Adaptation and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. He’s gotten more ambitious since he began directing, to good effect (Synecdoche, New York) and bad (Anomalisa), but always with the same preoccupations with existence, mortality, and the subjective nature of reality. The films he’s directed have had a tendency towards self-indulgence and nebulousness, but also an unsettling creepiness -Synecdoche began as a kind of horror movie in fact. And I’m Thinking of Ending Things is his scariest movie thus far.
It is a movie that dares you to try to make sense of it in a manner not unlike Alain Resnais’ art film classic Last Year at Marienbad. Like in that film, its’ hypnotically inconsistent reality serves two functions. One, to force you to interpret as you watch the meaning behind each anomaly, each fortuity; and two, to make you uneasy and anxious as the universe appears to be crumbling around the point-of-view character. Whatever is left to ambiguity, one thing is clear and that is that the young woman does not want to be at Jake’s parents’ farm. She’s eager to get back home and to her job in the morning. But everything from the environment (a blizzard outside) to the people around her to her own intuition seem to prevent her from reaching this objective, its’ urgency growing more the longer the film goes on. It’s utterly haunting, like an unreal, unending nightmare.
And Kaufman weaves in a lot of material to keep you questioning what’s actually going on and how reliable the young woman is. For instance, early on the idea is introduced through metaphor of thoughts being planted rather than personally grown, and sure enough, the film is dotted with such references passed off as original. On the car ride, she recites a poem she wrote that she later finds in a book at Jakes’ parents’ house (actually by Montreal poet Eva H.D.), a reference to Wordsworth seems to give her her name, the musical Oklahoma pops up all throughout the film, and in my favourite bit, a discussion on John Cassavettes’ A Woman Under the Influence turns into the woman merely monologuing a section of Pauline Kaels’ review of the film -in a Kael impression no less (her book For Keeps also appears at an earlier point)! The woman experiences bursts of deja vu, a dog shakes off when coming indoors for just a little too long, time itself will appear to bend around her, and most notably her thoughts will every so often be intertwined with an old janitor (Guy Boyd) in some empty school, cleaning the place, loitering, or watching a curious rom-com (where the movies’ funniest gag comes from).
She appears to be the axis around which all of this spins and the grounding force of the film, as detached as she sometimes is from the most extreme elements. And Jessie Buckley plays her with an intense degree of pathos and nuance -as little as we know about her (her memories like her work are frequently inconsistent), we understand her a lot. She communicates often through voiceover, but she conveys just as much through her muted attitude. That unease in the odd behaviour of strangers, the resignation to a partners’ insistent pressures -has any actor ever captured better the discomfort of being trapped in a place adjacent to a personal argument? And her anxiety, especially in the latter parts of the movie is deeply palpable. We’ve all been frustrated by delays, and that is much of what she has to go through by the notably long third act. There’s one scene too late in the film, a recollection concerning the origin of her relationship with Jake, that is very revealing -not just in-film, but to the real life difference between a perceived meet-cute and how it actually resonates for women. It’s a performance that is truly remarkable, something to hopefully gain Buckley the international acclaim she’s already been cultivating in the U.K.
Plemons is very good too, as he raises to the challenge of the mysterious Jake -genial, intelligent, and supportive, but not terribly conscientious and a bit condescending. All through the film, Plemons perfects this vibe of unnerving impulsiveness and invisible power -the womans’ fate is always in his hands. And this becomes exceptionally intriguing in light of where the film ultimately takes this character. The cast is rounded out by David Thewlis and Toni Collette as Jake’s eccentric parents -eccentric, but not terribly unusual to anyone who’s known older farming people. Both are excellent, Thewlis as the shifty, clueless, somewhat inappropriate father, and Collette as the overbearing, bad joke-making, tinnitus-suffering mother.
There’s a reason for her tinnitus, just as there’s a reason for a woman at an ice cream store to have the same bruise as Jake, and a reason behind Jake’s story of a pig that died from an infestation of maggots. These reasons are going to be lost on most viewers, I’m not entirely sure I understand them yet myself. As for the meaning behind I’m Thinking of Ending Things, while it’s clearly exploring a host of ideas, from consciousness to originality to aging to death (a popular one for Kaufman) to the greater questions of the human condition, it doesn’t want you leaving the film with a single theme. Kaufman has taken a bunch of the ideas that he contemplates and that interest him, and has stuffed them in a blender, using the aesthetics of psychological horror and Reid’s book as a foundation (the ending to the film is different and far more surreal). And yet for its’ pretentiousness, it coalesces into something mesmerizing; and Kaufman both knows how to satiate our thirst for mystery and is self-aware enough to insert a speech directly lifted from A Beautiful Mind. He remembered that he’s funny.
I’m Thinking of Ending Things is as wild as it is complex and steeped in post-modern symbolism and metaphor I’m sure only Kaufman fully comprehends. But it pairs the big ideas and loose reality with such intimate context, terrific performances, and technical brilliance (particularly from cinematographer Łukasz Żal, who composes one of the most perturbing deep focus shots near the end), that it not only warrants the multiple viewings it certainly prompts, but leaves a distinct impression on those who watch it that is unlike anything else they might experience from a movie.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...