Skip to main content

The Dulcet Monotony of Summerland


Inauspicious British period dramas like Summerland are a dime a dozen. Usually set between the dawn of the twentieth century and the 1960s (and often during the Second World War), one comes by about every year that is in style and tone not unlike something you might encounter on a BBC affiliate or PBS on a Saturday night. These films like Their Finest, The Bookshop, and The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society generally skew older in terms of their target audience, with feel-good narratives, simple conflicts, and an abundance of pretty or nostalgic scenery designed to show off serene England particularly for non-English viewers -Summerland is set on the coast of Kent so there’s plenty of that. But while these movies are of a particular type, that doesn’t mean they can’t be good within those boundaries.
I’m not convinced Summerland is, but it makes a valiant effort, the debut film of Olivier award winning playwright Jessica Swale (who’d previously worked with both her lead actresses on the play Nell Gwynn). Though structured like a biopic, the film is a fiction about a reclusive writer and folklorist in the 1940s who reluctantly takes in a London evacuee boy. Over the course of getting to know the kid and introducing him to her passion and perspective on the world, she becomes a surrogate mother to him. Gemma Arterton plays this part, Alice Lamb, and plays it aptly, surprisingly adept as a cantankerous woman in her forties well used to being the village scapegoat. She carries herself with an air of the utmost confidence and certainty in her esoteric beliefs that of course belies her insecurities and the spectre of her past.
That past being an illicit affair glimpsed in minuscule flashback episodes she had during the inter-war years with Gugu Mbatha-Raw’s Vera that came to a heartbreaking end some years prior. Alice has been carrying the wounds of this lost love ever since. The scenes expounding on this are probably the films’ strongest, utilizing its’ two best actresses well and injecting a refreshing bit of queerness (albeit notably chaste) into an otherwise rather conservative-oriented film. The significance of seeing this relationship plays into the films’ final act, but before then it works to adequately humanize the at-times deliberately off-putting Alice.
The title comes from the name of a pagan interpretation of the afterlife called “the Summerland”, illustrated in the film through a mirage-like optical illusion of an island in the sky. Alice’s expertise in ancient European mythology and new Pagan beliefs underlines a lot of her character development with Frank (Lucas Bond), though his subsequent interest comes off as more than a little disingenuous. I’m not sure whether he’s genuinely meant to be compelled by this stuff. He does seem to Christian-ize it a tad by the end as an equivalent counterpart to heaven.
Frank is one of the films’ poorest executed components. Bond does fine for what he’s got, but the character never breaks free of his dismal war orphan type. I also get the sense he was written as a younger boy than he was cast, at one point making more of a fuss over a scraped knee than is necessarily appropriate for a kid seemingly pushing fourteen. He only ever warrants interest in the vicinity of better characters like Alice or his joyful yet idiosyncratically nihilistic playmate Edie (Dixie Egerickx).
There’s a major twist related to his character, which though perhaps not explicitly foreshadowed is very much an “it figures” kind of plot turn than something truly astonishing. Following up the standard outed liar device (a not at all inventive variation I’d add), it suggests a lot more potential than this movie could possibly live up to. Summerland is not the kind of movie equipped to really investigate the level of drama brought about by its twist to any meaningful end. How the movie ultimately handles it therefore doesn’t strike me as disappointing, just expectedly mediocre. This is a film that doesn’t have a lot on its mind after all, or at least nothing particularly noteworthy. The off-screen death of Frank’s father halfway through seems to suggest the film is making a statement about loss or grief or the importance of surrogate families or even faith. But whatever it is saying, isn’t conveyed with enough force or conviction to remain with its audience within ten minutes of leaving the theatre.
The movie is fixed with a framing device that is useless, featuring Penelope Wilton (the third-billed star) as an older Alice in the 1970s. She appears only briefly at the beginning and end in a sustained continuity that is narratively confused with the film proper: she’s grumpy and mean to teenagers at the start to reflect her younger selfs’ initial attitude, but then is suddenly seen to be warm and kindly at the end as we’re told she eventually became -within the span of presumably a few short hours.
Tom Courtenay is the other veteran appearing in the film, alongside other recognizable faces of the British screen industry, Amanda Lawrence and the great Siân Phillips -though they’re often little more than set dressing. They like their quaint environment are there to sell an old-world British quaintness. It is what Summerland is best at. Laurie Rose, the regular cinematographer for Ben Wheatley, manages some very pretty imagery (one particular scene at dusk of Alice’s cabin overlooking the cliffs struck me), and some glistening moments of halcyon abandon in those flashbacks. Summerland is nice and very British and occasionally engaging, but like witnessing that mystic plane, it produces only a fleeting pleasure.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....