Skip to main content

The American Dream, Jewish Heritage, and Pickles: An Indictment


There seems to be an unwritten rule of comedy that requires a comedian of a certain clout to eventually play a dual role for a movie, regardless of whether it is a good idea or not. Often it is not.  Look no further than to Mike Myers, Tyler Perry, and the many many dual performances of Eddie Murphy. It took nearly a decade for Adam Sandler to bounce back from the travesty that was Jack & Jill, and An American Pickle (though not nearly as outdated a joke) had every chance of failing in the same ways. Seth Rogen though, is perhaps savvier than those prior examples in how he chooses to proceed with the gimmick; teaming up with New Yorker writer and Man Seeking Woman creator Simon Rich to adapt his novella Sell Out (originally published in the New Yorker in fact) into this uniquely absurd movie about a Jewish immigrant who fled his former Russian state from the Cossacks and was frozen in a vat of pickle brine for a century going to war with his great-grandson over business ventures and family honour.
If nothing else, HBO Max's first original movie, which is also the directing debut of cinematographer Brandon Trost (who has shot a lot of previous Rogen vehicles), at least has it where it counts as far as outlandish premises go. Side-stepping all the various fish out of water beats and anachronisms, the idea of a man from the time of polio competing with a modern web developer in the open market by selling jarred pickles is pretty funny on its own merits. But the film is keenly interested in expanding the scope of that humour into a satire on the state of the modern American experiment itself. For every acknowledged gift of contemporary society, there is an asterix, an indisputable reminder things haven’t advanced all that much where it matters. In particular the film seems to go after the American Dream myth by illustrating the bizarre ways that the U.S. system for finding success functions. While Ben struggles in vain to sell an ethical consumption app called Boop Bop, Herschel’s business swiftly takes off as a novelty, his personality becoming something of a commodity, which allows him to bounce back from just about every sabotage Ben tries to exact.
But at the same time, Herschel’s ignorance heavily facilitates this, often moved or manipulated towards a sustained public consciousness so that he is never entirely in control of his own fate -like if Forrest Gump were self aware. One portion of the movie, where he is briefly exploited by the alt-right as a “free speech” advocate after a series of bigoted tweets, reminded me a lot of Network and its’ blistering impression of a callous mass media shepherding a vulnerable mans’ irate proselytizing -especially in how immediately he is disowned by his own enablers once an aspect of his politics ever so slightly contradicts theirs.
The commentary is not all cynical though. There is an air of lament in the contrast of the values and perspectives between Herschel and Ben that speaks to shifting cultural attitudes and priorities in an industrial, globalized world. Herschel had high expectations for the success of his family, bought into American idealism, remained conscious of his roots and devoted to his faith; while Ben has no family and few prospects, is rightfully disillusioned by any vestige of American idealism, has little interest in his heritage and has left Judaism. Family and heritage especially is the principal source of conflict between them, and to some degree the movie appears to side with Herschel on the grander scale. What better metaphor is there for America’s neglect of its immigrant past than the Jewish cemetery in sight of the Brooklyn bridge being in disrepair, unkempt and forgotten, and with a billboard for vodka overlooking it?
This in tandem with Ben’s disregard and blatant disrespect of Herschel’s deeply held beliefs and values speaks to a lost sense of cultural identity and heritage depreciation within the American melting pot. Specifically, Rogen and Rich and Trost seem to be speaking to a distinct sect of Jewish Americans. And it’s here where the film turns sincere and loses momentum in its themes. Because a core assumption behind that driving notion is that Americans aren’t in touch with their traditions, their faiths, and their immigrant roots. Which is certainly not the case, especially in immigrant communities of colour. And as such while the chief lesson is a somewhat noble one, it does come across as slightly ignorant and dishonest, and only applicable to white people of a specific ancestry and persuasion.
Still, Rogen plays it quite well, especially considering how difficult the drama is to relate through his exaggerated accent and caricatured personality as Herschel. But he’s primarily in this to have some fun. The filmmakers delight in the character of his homeland of Schlopsk, a pale and dreary variation on the shtetls of Fiddler on the Roof and Yentl, and take equal glee in how a transplanted Tevye-type would respond to the twenty-first century. As Ben on the other hand, a character already not so easy to like, Rogen is comparatively flat. He gets some great witty remarks from time to time and a earns a certain modicum of your sympathy, but you can tell the comedian is putting the brunt of his efforts elsewhere -as is often the case for the straight half as such dual roles.
An American Pickle on the whole though is funny enough to compensate for that. For as lacking and narrow as its central tenet is, its' satirical sensibilities and ridiculousness keeps it entertaining.  Certainly it's better than many a dual performance comedy to come before it, and sharper within that conceit than many that may come after as well.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...