Skip to main content

Tenet is Fine, But Not Worth Getting COVID For


This review of Tenet is coming from a place of privilege. Thanks to Christopher Nolan, his fans, and the media, this movie has been so touted as the saviour of cinema in the time of plague that it is both exhausting and impossible to leave that weight it carries unaddressed. I went to see Tenet, because I am lucky. I live in Canada and in an area that has done relatively well at keeping down the rate of COVID-19. But just because I did this does not mean people in more tenuous situations or in hubs of high infection should risk their health for a movie, any movie. I did not see this movie for Christopher Nolan, but for an exhibition model I love; and I understand and support any critic who has refused to see it and put their lives in danger in the process, just for a well-intentioned but misguided bit of egotism and studio greed.
And having watched Tenet, which has crafted this narrative that there's more riding on it than any other Nolan movie to date, I can assuredly say this movie is not worth all the conversation and drama surrounding it.
Tenet is not a bad film, but nor is it some great masterpiece of theatrical cinema that changes the movie landscape. In fact its' scope and visual calibre isn't even on par with Interstellar, one of Nolans' lesser efforts, or his last film Dunkirk. It is a perfectly decent, middle-of-the-road sci-fi espionage movie from the auteur director that did not need to be a 2020 release. And now that the hype is put to rest (as much as that is possible under the circumstances), we can examine it as a movie.
Simply put, it is standard Nolan. After the refreshing reprieve of Dunkirk, it is him returning to that well of genre film by way of visually compelling high concept that has driven his entire career. The idea in question is "inversion", the state of isolated objects or people having a reversed entropy, and thus moving backwards through time. The technology that allows for this has been developed in the future, the result of a cataclysmic war, the debris of which, particularly bullets, is being sold on the black market. The plot concerns a nameless CIA operative known only as "the Protagonist" (John David Washington) trying to prevent its' inception at the hands of a Russian oligarch (Kenneth Branagh).
The gears of the plot require a lot of heavy exposition, and the details are highly intricate and convoluted even then. A lot of the movie depends on how quickly you can wrap your head around these concepts of temporal physics, and the urgent spy film pacing certainly doesn't make them any clearer to grasp. Plot is so much more important than story or character here, perhaps more than any other Nolan film, and it doesn't make for a movie easy to connect with. The rules of inversion, the ultimate goal, and the actions taken make more sense as the movie goes along, but the opening scenes are near indecipherable for this. I'm still not entirely sure what the terrorist attack on an opera house in Kyiv did for the movie. It certainly didn't set up the Protagonist very well.
The mere fact that Nolans' lead character is called "the Protagonist" is pretty goofy to me, his use of the term "antagonist" to refer to his opponent even more so. It stinks of a kind of pretentiousness that doesn't match the air, tone, or style of this particular movie. And it just draws attention to how much of a blank slate the character can often be. Sure, as a CIA agent, it works that we don't know much about his history and identity, that Nolan would keep that side of him ambiguous; but he should have some kind of relatable personality and character. Washingtons' best moments in the film are when he is allowed to cut loose a tad and express that, be charismatic and genuinely interesting. On occasion, he displays a nice chemistry with his partner, played by a sterling Robert Pattinson, or Elizabeth Debicki’s vengeful Kat.
Pattinson and a powerfully raw Debicki are the stand-outs of the cast no question, though the film does feature small noteworthy turns from Hamish Patel and Clémence Poésy as well (and the standard Nolan movie Michael Caine appearance). For the second time though, Debicki is cast as a strong-willed woman desperate to escape an abusive marriage to a powerful arms dealer, and it’s a type she deserves to move away from. Her relationship with Branagh’s detestable Andrei Sator is an important side of the movie (and one relatively free of complex language), but handled the way it is, she’s too often an object for him to terrorize and escalate stakes. As for Branagh, he’s certainly menacing enough, and his bad Russian accent is at least more palatable than in his own Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. But he is essentially a Bond villain, which Branagh seems to recognize in aspects of his over-the-top performance, but Nolan doesn’t quite seem to -resulting in a character who never fully comes together to either of their intents.
However as expected, it’s the spectacle where Tenet really does shine. Visually, Tenet is marvellous. Even outside of its’ experimental physics, Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography is excellent, really capturing the sense of place and mood (the Nysted Wind Farm off of Denmark I predict will become permanently associated with this movie). And Nolan has only gotten better with staging action scenes, the inversion concept lending itself to some terrific ones. Particularly there’s a great art gallery heist featuring hand-to-hand fights between characters moving through time in opposing directions that is exceptionally shot and choreographed, and plays nicely with the wonky physics; and then there’s an intense car chase that uses the reversals to quite creative effect. Through all this, the special effects and visual trickery is stunning, the inverted aspects really feeling like remnants of another world here on Earth. Honestly though, the climax is probably the weakest of the grand action sequences, as mesmerizing as it can be. There’s not much sense of temporal geography there, and with a much larger assortment of characters, some inverted some not, it’s easy to get lost in the thick of it all.
And for as much technical mastery as there is on screen, there are also some bizarre professional oversights -most notably in the editing during conversational scenes, where the cuts are inconsistent and awkwardly paced (usually in the middle of a line of dialogue) to the point it looks like obvious post-production dubbing is taking place. Maybe this was the case, to make some of the exposition more digestible. Additionally, the sound mixing is bad in places, musical cues or sound effects drowning out action beats or characters. Which is a shame because it distracts from Ludwig Göranssons’ quite exemplary score.
There are a couple ideas by the end of the movie that suggest Nolan isn’t quite finished with them, and I don’t know if he means to sequelize Tenet or not. As it stands though, the movie isn’t quite compelling enough to earn it -which of course makes no difference if it does well enough financially. And I hope it doesn’t. Because now is not the time for people to be going to the movies in droves. With all the build up to Tenet and its’ “courageous” release during this pandemic, one might look at Nolans’ determination and figure ‘this must be the best movie of the year’ for its’ release date to be this stubbornly fought over. It is not. Nor is it one of the worst of the year, it’s right in the middle. Under normal circumstances, it is a film worth seeing in theatres. But these are not normal circumstances. I’m not reviewing the film to boast, but to confirm that it is worth waiting on. Do not go see it if you are immunocompromised or live somewhere with a high infection rate (or you know, just the United States in general). You are not missing much!
The universe may in fact be exacting some sort of retribution on Nolan for forcing Tenet into theatres at this time. I came home from the movie ready to speculate on it and dive into this review, but the moment I opened up Twitter to share a quick reaction, I was faced with the horrible news of Chadwick Bosemans' untimely death -and all thoughts of Tenet were quickly dashed from my mind in light of the far more pressing tragedy. A reminder that it is only a movie after all, far from the most important of things right now. Stay safe.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day