Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: La Haine (1995)


The beginning and ending of Mathieu Kassovitz’s La Haine are snapshots of police brutality directed at minority individuals. The former is composed of footage and photography of actual riots in French banlieues re-contextualized afterwards for the purposes of the narrative, depicting an attack on a police station. The latter is a small confrontation involving the films’ trio of leads, tense in Kassovitz’s slickly thunderous editing, the camera’s subjectivity, and the racist violence that has hounded them as they’ve gone about their day.
La Haine is set over a single day, following three friends from immigrant families living on a housing estate: a white Jewish man, a North African Muslim, and a black man -played respectively by Vincent Cassel, Saïd Taghmaoui, and Hubert Koundé, all as characters with the same names. Their friend Abdel was the man arrested and beaten in the incident that sparked the riots. As such, Vinz is determined to kill a cop with a gun he recovered should Abdel die, Hubert refuses to do anything that would provoke the police to further violence, and Saïd seems to take the whole situation for granted. But throughout their day these three experience constant racial and class profiling, and run afoul of the police time and again.
The title translates to “Hate” and is more explicitly taken from a line of Hubert’s: “La haine attire la haine” - “Hatred breeds hatred”. It’s a theme with wide connotations for French society that Kassovitz roots squarely in racism, anti-Semitism, and more specifically the presence of such bigotries in law enforcement. The police appear sporadically, whether in uniform or plainclothes, but always to antagonize the leads. They are seen as thugs, prideful in their power, such as when an officer breaks up a gathering on a rooftop or when Saïd is arrested merely for wanting to see his friend in hospital. One particularly uncomfortable scene sees Saïd and Hubert in police custody where they are physically and verbally abused by veteran officers teaching a rookie. Amid all this is one officer (Marc Duret) from their neighbourhood who claims to be a friend and a “good cop”, but is routinely put in situations where he has to stand against them.
It all reads incredibly current twenty-five years later, as though it could have been ripped from todays’ headlines and protests. What makes it especially resonant is how Kassovitz leaves no stone unturned. He very clearly draws the line between the hellraising attitude and lifestyles of his characters and the economic depression that forces them into these roles. They take the train into Paris at one point and the distinction between the rich bustling city and their own impoverished development is palpable in a terrific dolly zoom overlooking the Place d’léna. In fact, the stylish filmmaking overall is extremely effective, utilizing a lot of precision editing choices to illustrate frames of mind.
It’s especially notable in a number of moments centering on Vinz, who’s got the most hatred for the police, but the least to lose. He’s the only one of the three who is never arrested, and though his ideals about challenging authority and changing the system are just, he also idolizes Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver a bit too much in that quintessential way of people who misunderstand the film. His reasoning for his beliefs, his character journey, and where he ends up are incredibly fascinating, and worthy of their own discussion.
La Haine on a whole is worthy of much deeper analysis and as a springboard for larger discussion -as much as the film it is most often compared to, Do the Right Thing. And now as it proves itself unfortunately ageless, the time is ripe to be having that conversation.

Criterion Recommendation: Children of Men (2006)
The fact that only Alfonso Cuarón’s Spanish-language movies are in the Criterion Collection stinks of a little bit of bias. His English movies have been pretty great too, and best among them is his dystopian masterpiece Children of Men, both a smart engrossing thriller and a prescient cautionary tale. In the best role of his career, Clive Owen plays a beleaguered cynic living in a dying world of infertility, tasked with delivering the last pregnant woman (an astounding Clare-Hope Ashitey) to safety beyond the borders of Great Britain. Along the way the film comments severely on Britain and Europe’s treatment of refugees and asylum seekers during periods of intense political upheaval, and it features some of the best cinematography from Emmanuel Lubezki. The story, with its Biblical allusions and strong sense of hope amid despair is utterly captivating; and Cuarón demonstrates here more than anywhere else his exceptional belief in the power of human endurance.

Ways to Help Black Lives Matter: https://blacklivesmatters.carrd.co/#donate
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...