Skip to main content

Hamilton in Our Homes


Indisputably, the musical sensation of the 2010s was Hamilton. Lin-Manuel Miranda’s hip-hop retelling of the life of the American founding father seemingly came out of nowhere and hit at just the right time to become the biggest and most instantaneously iconic Broadway phenomenon since The Phantom of the Opera. Since its’ premiere in 2015 it has been talked about, dissected, and loved so much that it’s easy to forget that most people, even most theatre fans, haven’t actually seen it. Running almost exclusively on Broadway and with exorbitantly high ticket prices, most of us have had to be content with just hearing how great it is, without experiencing it for ourselves. Sure, the soundtrack has been available for a while, but that’s only a part of it, and as someone who is a fan of theatre, and especially great musicals, it’s been a bit of a bummer to go so long without seeing it. Especially now that I have.
If there’s one thing to say for Disney+ amid all its’ issues with aspect ratios and censorship and a bewildering refusal to expand its’ scope, it’s that it has facilitated at long last the democraticization of Hamilton. Thanks to that platform and the Disney Company’s carefully cultivated love affair with Miranda himself, Hamilton is for the first time available for a wide audience to see, and in a form that legitimately does justice to the production.
This filmed version is edited together from three performances in June 2016 at the Richard Rodgers Theatre in Manhattan with the original stage cast. Some shots are also clearly taken from dress rehearsals without an audience so as to better facilitate Steadicam, dolly, and even the occasional crane shots. As with the original production, it was directed by Thomas Kail, who despite the difference in mediums, knows how to translate the show to cinematic language. Indeed by employing cuts and close-ups and dynamic pans, it gives the show an intimacy it could never convey live. We’re watching Hamilton, Jefferson, Aaron Burr and others from the vantage point of the stage, and it’s that much more effective.
As for the show itself, well there’s a reason Hamilton took the world by storm. It really is just as good as everyone who’s been lucky enough to see it says. Just as unique and thrilling and mesmerizing and weirdly bold. Its’ retelling of the career of Alexander Hamilton with a distinctly colourblind cast, a self-aware political sensibility to the script, and a cacophony of modern musical influences renders it a style unto itself; a framing of history through the voice of the twenty-first century that celebrates it without succumbing to blind patriotism. The jingoist tendencies that often plague Americans’ interpretations of the Revolutionary War are absent, perhaps due to the recontextualization brought about by the shows’ portraits of the individuals leading that war. With so many non-white people occupying these roles, not only is the underdog status of the United States restored, but the ideals they’re fighting for are bestowed with a new and distinctly 2010s relevancy. Even ignoring the music, Hamilton could not have worked at any other point in history.
But who would want to ignore the music? While the production values are really impressive and the acting superb from the whole ensemble (it’s no wonder actors like Daveed Diggs and Anthony Ramos and especially Leslie Odom Jr. and Miranda himself broke out because of this show), the music is the key to Hamiltons’ success. From the opening notes, it’s viscerally pulsating and catching in a way that few other musicals are; the energy and immensity of the songs and sheer hook after hook are captivating to listen to. We see the performers making good use of that -the elaborate choreography is so creative and enthralling, and every performer is perfectly suited for their part in voice, emotion,and physicality. Miranda is obviously a consummate performer here in an incredibly demanding role, but the renaissance prowess of Odom can’t be ignored, as well as Philippa Soo and Renée Elise Goldsberry -who kills in some of the shows’ most extraordinary moments.
The purpose and passion behind the songs really elevate them too, Miranda’s greatest skill being his songwriting. Each major piece is characterized both by its strong textual foundation, its emotional themes and storytelling, but also its mastery of rhythm and the musical techniques that best cultivate excitement and/or pathos. From the introductory track “Alexander Hamilton”, the show-stopping “My Shot” (perhaps the most popular song), the bombastic “Story of Tonight”, the emotionally intense “Satisfied” and “Burn”, the fierce “Wait for It” and resentful “Room Where It Happens”, and the exceptionally moving finale “Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Tells Your Story” -all of them serve their purpose exactly and with aplomb. The more comedic songs are no less great, like the pair of rap battles between Hamilton and Jefferson (or really anything that utilizes Diggs’ enormously fun portrait of the third President); and honestly one of my favourites was “You’ll Be Back” and its brief reprisals by Jonathan Groff as a pompous, disdainful (and frequently spitting) King George III.
All of this has probably been said before and better by smarter people. I’m late to the game. What is important is that Hamilton, a relatively recent yet genuinely revolutionary Broadway musical that presents an image of American history as it ought to have been (and the mythology it still inhabits to those who would remain ignorant of its realities) looking forward to an American identity that it could become, can at last be seen by those outside the exclusive club that the theatre routinely is. The music and message and all around spectacle that is Hamilton deserves that greater audience, who may connect with it on a deeper level than those who could liberally spend hundreds of dollars to see it on Broadway -and especially in this time, when the shows’ unabashed optimism is sorely needed. This is the closest Hamilton should ever get to a movie adaptation (I can’t fathom it working removed from its’ stage), and so it makes sense that Disney would spend 75 million dollars to distribute it. And in so doing and making it publicly available on Disney+, they have at long last given their streaming service some original content that is not only wholly worthwhile but compulsory for musical fans and lovers of great art.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...