Skip to main content

The Criterion Channel Presents: Clouds of Sils Maria (2014)


Clouds of Sils Maria is a movie that simply gnaws at you. Its’ layered metatextual devices keep provoking new ideas and interpretation however you try and wrap your head around it. What is it really saying? What does it mean? Who are its’ characters, really? And yet it doesn’t aim to deliberately obfuscate the way movies its indebted to, such as Persona or more obviously The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant do. It definitely wants some clarity in what it is saying.
Olivier Assayas’ 2014 film also owes a lot to the likes of All About Eve and Sunset Boulevard as it depicts a world-renowned French actress Maria Enders (Juliette Binoche) returning to the play that launched her career. It is about the erotically charged relationship between a young and an older woman and how the former exploits the latter until she commits suicide. Maria had formerly played the girl Sigrid, and now in light of the playwrights’ death, has been talked into playing the elder Helena opposite a troubled Hollywood starlet (Chloë Grace Moretz). Most of the film takes place in Sils Maria, Switzerland, the home of the late playwright, where Maria reads lines and tries to overcome her apprehensions and anxieties with her loyal assistant Valentine (Kristen Stewart) on daily hikes, through which process real life and the play become merged, the viewer not entirely sure when Maria and Valentines’ conversations, arguments, or emotional reckonings are genuine and when they are mere rehearsal. Certainly the sexual tension between Maria and Valentine is real, Binoche and Stewart have excellent chemistry and are delivering a couple of the finest performances of either of their careers (Stewart especially is astonishingly good -this might have been where her career renaissance began). Moretz, though she isn’t in the film as much, is wonderful as the living embodiment of everything Maria resents about Hollywood, up to and including the overwrought superhero franchises both were involved in.
The film is an utterly engaging character study as Maria unwittingly performs self-psychoanalysis in her interpretations of Sigrid and Helena, which often clash with Valentines’ in a rift of perception that is simultaneously generational, interpersonal, and theoretical and which spills over into other things such as their views on art and acting -Valentine having a weird admiration for Moretz’s Jo-Ann Ellis in spite of her many controversies that Maria cannot share. And as close as they are, as much as Maria relies upon and believes she needs Valentine, it is a significant chasm of their relationship that ultimately results in a subtle narrative twist which much like the mystery at the centre of Picnic at Hanging Rock, you just can’t take your mind off of.
The title refers to a unique cloud formation in the Maloja Pass of the mountains around Sils Maria that gives the play-within-the-film (“Maloja Snake”) its’ title, and which is witnessed in the climax. Assayas utterly adores this region and captures its wonder stupendously, while allowing it to naturally influence the films’ hauntingly charismatic mood, as much an entrancing and complex a character as the woman who shares its’ name.

Criterion Recommendation: Two for the Road (1967)
Audrey Hepburn only has one movie in the Criterion Collection and that definitely needs to change! My nomination is for Two for the Road, one of the most unique films she was ever a part of that came right near the end of her mainstream career. In it, she and Albert Finney play a couple examining their relationship across a number of years through four holidays to the south of France. A film that is both presented in a non-linear structure and with a refreshing honesty and naturalism in its decade-spanning romance that predicts Richard Linklaters’ Before trilogy, it was unconventional and ahead of time. Directed by Stanley Donen of all people, boasting a Henry Mancini track he considered even better than “Moon River”, and with a sharp tone that hovered graciously between comedy and drama, it deserves greater recognition among the early New Hollywood classics.

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Jordan_D_Bosch
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more